Inference of spatiotemporal effects on cellular state transitions from time-lapse microscopy

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Strasser, Michael K ^a   Feigelman, Justin ^a,b   Theis, Fabian J ^a,b   Marr, Carsten ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell state transition; LASSO; Single cell analysis; Spatial interaction; Time lapse microscopy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84959129923     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0208-5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Waddington CH. Principles of Embryology. New York: New York, Macmillan; 1956, p. 528.
2. Orkin SH, Zon LI. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell. 2008; 132(4):631-44.
3. Gage FH, Temple S. Neural stem cells: Generating and regenerating the brain. Neuron. 2013; 80(3):588-601.
4. Davis RL, Weintraub H, Lassar AB. Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell. 1987; 51(6):987-1000.
5. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006; 126(4):663-76.
6. Yamanaka S. A fresh look at iPS cells. Cell. 2009; 137(1):13-7.
7. Marr C, Strasser M, Schwarzfischer M, Schroeder T, Theis FJ. Multi-scale modeling of GMP differentiation based on single-cell genealogies. FEBS J. 2012; 279(18):3488-500.
8. Lorincz MT. Optimized Neuronal Differentiation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells: Role of Cell Density In: Turksen K, editor. Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols. New Jersey: Humana Press: 2006. p. 55-69.
9. Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell. 2008; 132(4):598-611.
10. Scherf N, Herberg M, Thierbach K, Zerjatke T, Kalkan T, Humphreys P, et al.Imaging, quantification and visualization of spatio-temporal patterning in mESC colonies under different culture conditions. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(18):556-61.
11. Shivanandan A, Radenovic A, Sbalzarini IF. MosaicIA: an ImageJ/Fiji plugin for spatial pattern and interaction analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14:349.
12. Schroeder T. Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals. Nature. 2008; 453(7193):345-51.
13. Amat F, Lemon W, Mossing D, McDole K. Fast, accurate reconstruction of cell lineages from large-scale fluorescence microscopy data. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(9):951-8.
14. Haseltine EL, Rawlings JB. Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics. J Chem Phys. 2002; 117(15):6959.
15. Fuchs C. Inference for Diffusion Processes: With Applications in Life Sciences. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
16. Buggenthin F, Marr C, Schwarzfischer M, Hoppe PS, Hilsenbeck O, Schroeder T, et al.An automatic method for robust and fast cell detection in bright field images from high-throughput microscopy. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14(1):297.
17. Rieger MA, Hoppe PS, Smejkal B, Eitelhuber AC, Schroeder T. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science. 2009; 325:217-8.
18. Costa MR, Ortega F, Brill MS, Beckervordersandforth R, Petrone C, Schroeder T, et al.Continuous live imaging of adult neural stem cell division and lineage progression in vitro. Development. 2011; 138(6):1057-68.
19. Eilken HM, Nishikawa SI, Schroeder T. Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium. Nature. 2009; 457(7231):896-900.
20. Francis K, Palsson BO. Effective intercellular communication distances are determined by the relative time constants for cyto/chemokine secretion and diffusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(23):12258-62.
21. Williams P, Camara M, Hardman A, Swift S, Milton D, Hope VJ, et al.Quorum sensing and the population-dependent control of virulence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Series B Biol Sci. 2000; 355(1397):667-80.
22. McCullagh J, Nelder P. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1989.
23. Zou G. A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159(7):702-6.
24. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1996; 58(1):267-88.
25. Murphy KP. Machine Learning: a Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2012.
26. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer; 2009.
27. He H, Garcia E. Learning from Imbalanced Data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2009; 21(9):1263-84.
28. Guns M, Vanacker V, Glade T. Logistic regression applied to natural hazards: rare event logistic regression with replications. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2012; 12:1937-47.
29. Bach F. Bolasso: model consistent lasso estimation through the bootstrap. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. Madison, Wisconsin: Omnipress: 2008. p. 33-40.
30. Maska M, Ulman V, Svoboda D, Matula P, Matula P, Ederra C, et al.A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(11):1-8.
31. Snijder B, Sacher R, Rämö P, Damm EM, Liberali P, Pelkmans L. Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature. 2009; 461(7263):520-3.
32. Knapp B, Rebhan I, Kumar A, Matula P, Kiani NA, Binder M, et al.Normalizing for individual cell population context in the analysis of high-content cellular screens. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12(1):485.
33. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001; 45:5-32.
34. Kuchina A, Espinar L, Çagatay T, Balbin AO, Zhang F, Alvarado A, et al.Temporal competition between differentiation programs determines cell fate choice. Mol Syst Biol. 2011; 7(557):1-11.
35. Grün B, Leisch F. Finite Mixtures of Generalized Linear Regression Models. In: Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas SE - 11. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica Verlag: 2008. p. 205-30.
36. Cox D. Regression models and life tables. JR stat soc B. 1972; 34(2):187-220.
37. Andersen PK, Gill RD. Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes:A Large Sample Study. Ann Stat. 1982; 10:1100-20.
38. Granger CWJ. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica. 1969; 37(3):424-38.
39. Tibshirani R, Saunders M, Rosset S, Zhu J, Knight K. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B: Stat Methodol. 2005; 67(1):91-108.
40. Appel B, Givan LA, Eisen JS. Delta-Notch signaling and lateral inhibition in zebrafish spinal cord development. BMC Dev Biol. 2001; 1:13.
41. Metcalf D. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood. 2008; 111(2):485-91.
42. Stingl J, Caldas C. Molecular heterogeneity of breast carcinomas and the cancer stem cell hypothesis. Nat Revi Cancer. 2007; 7(10):791-9.
43. Kueh HY, Champhekhar A, Nutt SL, Elowitz MB, Rothenberg EV. Positive Feedback Between PU.1 and the Cell Cycle Controls Myeloid Differentiation. Science. 2013; 341(6146):670-3.
44. Krumsiek J, Marr C, Schroeder T, Theis FJ. Hierarchical differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors is encoded in the transcription factor network. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(8):22649.
45. Strasser M, Theis FJ, Marr C. Stability and multiattractor dynamics of a toggle switch based on a two-stage model of stochastic gene expression. Biophys J. 2012; 102(1):19-29.
46. Chenouard N, Smal I, de Chaumont F, Maška M, Sbalzarini IF, Meijering E. Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(3):281-9.
47. Cohen AR, Gomes FLAF, Roysam B, Cayouette M. Computational prediction of neural progenitor cell fates. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(3):213-8.
48. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, Robertson M, et al.Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature. 2007; 450:1230-4.
49. Herberg M, Kalkan T, Glauche I, Smith A, Roeder I. A model-based analysis of culture-dependent phenotypes of mESCs. PloS ONE. 2014; 9(3):92496.
50. Schröter C, Rué P, Mackenzie JP, Martinez Arias A. FGF/MAPK signaling sets the switching threshold of a bistable circuit controlling cell fate decisions in ES cells. bioRxiv. 2015. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/04/21/015404.
51. Gupta PB, Fillmore CM, Jiang G, Shapira SD, Tao K, Kuperwasser C, Lander ES. Stochastic state transitions give rise to phenotypic equilibrium in populations of cancer cells. Cell. 2011; 146(4):633-44.
52. Magee JA, Piskounova E, Morrison SJ. Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty. Cancer Cell. 2012; 21(3):283-96.