Reorganization of a synthetic microbial consortium for one-step vitamin C fermentation

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Wang, En Xu ^a   Ding, Ming Zhu ^a   Ma, Qian ^a   Dong, Xiu Tao ^a   Yuan, Ying Jin ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Interaction; Metabolomics; One step fermentation; Reorganization; Synthetic microbial consortium

Indexed keywords

2 KETO GULONIC ACID; ASCORBIC ACID; FATTY ACID; OXOACID; PURINE; SORBITOL; TRICARBOXYLIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIOENGINEERING; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GLUCONOBACTER OXYDANS; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; KETOGULONICIGENIUM VULGARE; METABOLOMICS; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYMBIONT; FERMENTATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ASCORBIC ACID; FERMENTATION; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA;

EID: 84959086912     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0418-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Teague BP, Weiss R. Synthetic communities the sum of parts. Science. 2015;349:924-5.
2. Brune KD, Bayer TS. Engineering microbial consortia to enhance biomining and bioremediation. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:203.
3. Shou W, Ram S, Vilar JMG. Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1877-82.
4. Chuang JS, Rivoire O, Leibler S. Simpson's paradox in a synthetic microbial system. Science. 2009;323:272-5.
5. Waite AJ, Shou W. Adaptation to a new environment allows cooperators to purge cheaters stochastically. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:19079-86.
6. Tsai SL, Goyal G, Chen W. Surface display of a functional minicellulosome by intracellular complementation using a synthetic yeast consortium and its application to cellulose hydrolysis and ethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;76(22):7514-20.
7. Minty JJ, Singer ME, Scholz SA, Bae CH, Ahn JH, Foster CE, et al. Design and characterization of synthetic fungal-bacterial consortia for direct production of isobutanol from cellulosic biomass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:14592-7.
8. Rosenbaum MA, Bar HY, Beg QK, Segrèc D, Booth J, Cotta MA, Angenent LT. Shewanella oneidensis in a lactate-fed pure-culture and a glucose-fed co-culture with Lactococcus lactis with an electrode as electron acceptor. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:2623-8.
9. Zhou K, Qiao K, Edgar S, Stephanopoulos G. Distributing a metabolic pathway among a microbial consortium enhances production of natural products. Nat Biotechnol. 2015. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3095.
10. Phelan VV, Liu WT, Pogliano K, Dorrestein PC. Microbial metabolic exchange-the chemotype-to-phenotype link. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:26-35.
11. Faust K, Raes J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:538-50.
12. Ma Q, Zhou J, Zhang WW, Meng XX, Sun JW, Yuan YJ. Integrated proteomic and metabolomic analysis of an artificial microbial community for two-step production of vitamin C. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26108.
13. Du J, Zhou J, Xue J, Song H, Yuan YJ. Metabolomic profiling elucidates community dynamics of the Ketogulonigenium vulgare-Bacillus megaterium consortium. Metabolomics. 2012;8:960-73.
14. Zhou J, Yi H, Wang LL, Zhang WW, Yuan YJ. Metabolomic analysis of the positive effects on Ketogulonigenium vulgare growth and 2-keto-l-gulonic acid production by reduced glutathione. OMICS. 2012;16:387-96.
15. Ding MZ, Zou Y, Song H, Yuan YJ. Metabolomic analysis of cooperative adaptation between co-cultured Bacillus cereus and Ketogulonigenium vulgare. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94889.
16. Song H, Ding MZ, Jia XQ, Ma Q, Yuan YJ. Synthetic microbial consortia: from systematic analysis to construction and applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:6954-81.
17. Chen Y, Kim JK, Hirning AJ, Josić K, Bennett MR. Emergent genetic oscillations in a synthetic microbial consortium. Science. 2015;349:986-9.
18. Agapakis CM, Boyle PM, Silver PA. Natural strategies for the spatial optimizationof metabolism in synthetic biology. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:527-35.
19. Ding MZ, Zhou X, Yuan YJ. Metabolome profiling reveals adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during repeated vacuum fermentations. Metabolomics. 2010;6:42-55.
20. Ding MZ, Wang X, Yang Y, Yuan YJ. Comparative metabolic profiling of parental and inhibitors-tolerant yeasts during lignocellulosic ethanol fermentation. Metabolomics. 2012;8:232-43.
21. Xia J, Wishart DS. Web-based inference of biological patterns functions and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:743-60.
22. Takagi Y, Sugisawa T, Hoshino T. Continuous 2-Keto-L-gulonic acid fermentation by mixed culture of Ketogulonigenium vulgare DSM 4025 and Bacillus megaterium or Xanthomonas maltophilia. Appl Microbil Biotechnol. 2010;86:469-80.
23. Soemphol W, Toyama H, Moonmangmee D, Adachi O, Matsushita K. L-Sorbose reductase and its transcriptional regulator involved in l-sorbose utilization of Gluconobacter frateurii. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:4800-8.
24. Ge X, Zhao Y, Hou W, Zhang WC, Chen WW, Wang JH, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of the Industrial Strain Gluconobacter oxydans H24. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00003-13.
25. Liu L, Chen K, Zhang J, Liu J, Chen J. Gelatin enhances 2-keto-l-gulonic acid production based on Ketogulonigenium vulgare genome annotation. J Biotechnol. 2011;156:182-7.
26. Leduc S, Troostembergh JC, Lebeault JM. Folate requirements of the 2-keto-l-gulonic acid-producing strain Ketogulonigenium vulgare LMP P-20356 in l-sorbose/CSL medium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65:163-7.
27. Cai L, Yuan MQ, Li ZJ, Chen JC, Chen GQ. Genetic engineering of Ketogulonigenium vulgare for enhanced production of 2-keto-l-gulonic acid. J Biotechnol. 2012;157:320-5.
28. You KM, Rosenfield CL, Knipple DC. Ethanol tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on cellular oleic acid content. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1499-503.
29. Dinh TN, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to high ethanol concentration and changes in fatty acid composition of membrane and cell size. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2623.