Corrigendum to: A dialectic perspective on the interactive relationship between social media and civic participation: the moderating role of social capital (Information, Communication & Society, (2016), 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154586);A dialectic perspective on the interactive relationship between social media and civic participation: the moderating role of social capital

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 151-166

  Choi, Doo Hun ^a   Shin, Dong Hee ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

civic participation; moderating role; social capital; Social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959044145     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1235704     Document Type: Erratum

References (60)

1. B.Bimber, (2003). Information and American democracy:Technology in the evolution of political power. New York:Cambridge University Press.
2. B.Bimber, A.J.Flanagin, & C.Stohl, (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365–388. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
3. L.Bode, E.K.Vraga, P.Borah, & D.V.Shah, (2014). A new space for political behavior:Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 414–429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
4. S.Boulianne, (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193–211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363
5. S.Boulianne, (2015). Social media use and participation:A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
6. J.Cohen, & P.Cohen, (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hilldale, NJ:Erlbaum.
7. J.Cohen, P.Cohen, S.G.West, & L.S.Aiken, (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
8. M.Duggan, & A.Smith, (2013). Social media update 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
9. N.B.Ellison, C.Steinfield, & C.Lampe, (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends:’’ Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
10. J.H.Fowler, (2006). Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68, 335–344. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00410.x
11. A.Giddens, (1991). Modernity and self-identify:Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
12. H.Gil de Zúñiga, N.Jung, & S.Valenzuela,. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
13. H.Gil de Zúñiga, L.Molyneux, & P.Zheng, (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation:Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612–634. doi:10.1111/jcom.12103
14. D.A.Graber, B.Bimber, W.L.Bennett, R.Davis, & P.Norris, (2004). The Internet and politics:Emerging perspectives. In H.Nissenbaum & M.E.Price (Eds.), Academy & the internet (pp. 90–119). New York:Peter Lang Publishing.
15. M.T.Heaney, & S.D.McClurg, (2009). Social networks and American politics:Introduction to the special issue. American Politics Research, 37, 727–741. doi:10.1177/1532673X09337771
16. K.P.Hocevar, A.J.Flanagin, & M.J.Metzger, (2014). Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.020
17. M.Hooghe, (2002). Watching television and civic engagement:Disentangling the effects of time, programs, and stations. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 84–104. doi:10.1177/1081180X0200700206
18. R.Huckfeldt, & J.Sprague, (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication:Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
19. K.D.Hyun, & J.Kim, (2015). Differential and interactive influences on political participation by different types of news activities and political conversation through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 328–334. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.031
20. L.W.Jeffres, J.-W.Lee, K.Neuendorf, & D.Atkin, (2007). Newspaper reading supports community involvement. Newspaper Research Journal, 28, 6–23.
21. J.E.Katz, & R.E.Rice, (2002). Social consequences of internet use:Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
22. S.-H.Kim, (2007). Media use, social capital, and civic participation in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 477–494. doi:10.1177/107769900708400305
23. S.-H.Kim, & M.Han, (2005). Media use and participatory democracy in South Korea. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 133–153. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_4
24. S.-W.Kim, J.Kim, Y.K.Moon, & S.B.Shin, (2013). 2012 Korean general social survey. Seoul, South Korea:Sungkyunkwan University Press.
25. Y.M.Kim, (2012). The shifting sands of citizenry?:Toward a model of the citizenry in life politics. In D.Shah, L.Friedland, H.Rojas, Y.M.Kim, & C.Wells (Eds.), Communication, consumers, and citizens:Revisiting the politics of consumption (pp. 147–158). New York, NY:Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
26. Y.Kim, S.-H.Hsu, & H.Gil de Zúñiga, (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement:The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498–516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034
27. N.Kwak, D.V.Shah, & R.L.Holbert, (2004). Connecting, trusting, and participating:The direct and interactive effects of social associations. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 643–652. doi:10.1177/106591290405700412
28. P.F.Lazarsfeld, B.Berelson, & H.Gaudet, (1944). The people's choice:How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York:Columbia University Press.
29. H.-R.Lee, H.E.Lee, J.Choi, J.H.Kim, & H.L.Han, (2014). Social media use, body image, and psychological well-being:A cross-cultural comparison of Korea and the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 1343–1358. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.904022
30. C.H.Lien, & Y.Cao, (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth:Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.013
31. C.Lim, (2008). Social networks and political participation:How do network matter? Social Forces, 87, 961–982. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0143
32. M.Madden, & K.Zickuhr, (2011). 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Networking-Sites.aspx
33. P.Mihailidis, (2014). The civic-social media disconnect:Exploring perceptions of social media for engagement in the daily life of college students. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 1059–1071. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.877054
34. A.Mitchell, T.Rosenstiel, & L.Christian, (2012). What Facebook and Twitter mean for news. The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism. Retrieved from http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/what-facebook-and-twitter-mean-for-news/
35. P.Moy, & D.A.Scheufele, (2000). Media effects on political and social trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 744–759. doi:10.1177/107769900007700403
36. B.Osatuyi, (2013). Information sharing on social media sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2622–2631. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.001
37. R.J.Pingree, (2007). How messages affect their senders:A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory, 17, 439–461. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00306.x
38. R.D.Putnam, (1995). Bowling alone:America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002
39. R.D.Putnam, (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. The American Prospect, 24, 34–48.
40. R.D.Putnam, (2000). Bowing alone:The collapse and revival of American community. New York:Simon & Schuster.
41. L.Rainie, A.Smith, K.Lehman, H.Brady, & S.Verba, (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Political-Engagement.aspx
42. D.V.Shah, (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use:An individual level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469–496. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00114
43. D.V.Shah, J.Cho, W.P.Eveland, & N.Kwak, (2005). Information and expression in a digital age:Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
44. D.V.Shah, N.Kwak, & R.L.Holbert, (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life:Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141–162. doi:10.1080/105846001750322952
45. D.Shin, (2008). The development of community telecommunication infrastructure:An evaluation of rural telecommunications project. International Journal of Information Management, 28(4), 322–335. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.02.003
46. D.Shin, (2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking:A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 428–438. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001
47. D.Shin, (2013). Defining sociability and social presence in social TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 939–947. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.006
48. D.Shin, & Y.J.Shin, (2011). Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 852–861. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.010
49. D.Shin, & J.Kim, (2015). Social viewing behavior in social TV:Proposing a new concept of socio-usability. Online Information Review, 39, 416–434. doi:10.1108/OIR-12-2014-0299
50. A.Smith, (2013). Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_CivicEngagementintheDigitalAge.pdf
51. P.E.Tetlock, L.Skitka, & R.Boettger, (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability:Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632–640. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632
52. E.M.Uslaner, (1998). Social capital, television, and the “mean world”:Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441–467. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00113
53. S.Valenzuela, (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior:The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920–942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375
54. S.Valenzuela, Y.Kim, & H.Gil de Zúñiga, (2012). Social networks that matter:Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 163–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037
55. S.Valenzuela, N.Park, & K.F.Kee, (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
56. S.Verba, K.L.Schlozman, & H.Brady, (1995). Voice and equality:Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
57. A.M.Warren, A.Sulaiman, & N.I.Jaafar, (2015). Understanding civic engagement behavior on Facebook from a social capital theory perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 163–175. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2014.934290
58. M.Xenos, A.Vromen, & B.D.Loader, (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
59. S.Zhao, S.Grasmuck, & J.Martin, (2008). Identity construction on Facebook:Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
60. S.Zmerli, & K.Newton, (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 706–724. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn054