Survival of commons? Institutions for robust forest social – ecological systems

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 24, Issue , 2016, Pages 175-185

  Kluvánková, Tatiana ^a   Gežík, Veronika ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOREST ECOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^b Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Complexity; Forest commons; Institutional maturity; Robustness; Socio ecological dynamics

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMPLEXITY; FOREST COMMONS; INSTITUTIONAL MATURITY; IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES; NATURAL VARIABILITY; ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS; SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL; SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

ECOLOGY;

ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; SURVIVAL; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84959039130     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2016.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acheson, J.M., Capturing the Commons: Devising Institutions to Manage the Maine Lobster Industry. 2003, University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
2. Anderies, J.M., Janssen, M.A., Ostrom, E., A framework to analyse the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol. Soc., 9(1), 2004 (art18).
3. Barbier, E., Cox, M., Economic and demographic factors affecting mangrove loss in the coastal provinces of Thailand, 1979–1996. Ambio 31:4 (2002), 351–357.
4. Berkes, F., The common property resource problem and the creation of limited property rights. Hum. Ecol. 13:2 (1985), 187–208.
5. Berkes, F., Local level management and the commons problem: a comparative study of Turkish coastal fisheries. Mar. Policy 10 (1986), 215–229.
6. Berkes, F., Folke, C., Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Basurto, X., Gelcich, S., Ostrom, E., The social–ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 23:6 (2013), 1366–1380.
8. Chobotová, V., Institutional rebuild in CEE countries. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., (eds.) From Government to Governance? New Governance for Water and Biodiversity in an Enlarged Europe, 2010, Alfa Nakladatelství, Prague, 84–105.
9. Fleischman, F.D., Boenning, K., Garcia-Lopez, G.A., Mincey, S., Schmitt-Harsh, M., Daedlow, K., Lopez, M., Basurto, X., Fischer, B., Ostrom, E., Disturbance, response, and persistence in self-organized forested communities: analysis of robustness and resilience in five communities in southern Indiana. Ecol. Soc., 15(4), 2010 art 9.
10. Gatzweiler, F., Hagedorn, K., The evolution of institutions in transition. Int. J. Agricult. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 2 (2002), 37–58.
11. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C.E.F., Gintis, H., Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Howlett, M., Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multilevel nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci. 42 (2009), 73–89.
13. Janssen, M.A., Anderies, J.M., Robustness trade-offs in social-ecological systems. Int. J. Commons 1:1 (2007), 43–65.
14. Janssen, M.A., Anderies, J.M., Ostrom, E., Robustness of social–ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability. Soc. Nat. Resour. 20:4 (2007), 307–322.
15. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Can long lasting institution survive market economy? Evolution of forest common property regime in Central Europe. Prognostické Práce, 3(2), 2011, 2011.
16. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Governing natural commons. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Jilková, J., Kozová, M., (eds.) From Governing to Governance Reconsidered, 2013, Catholic University of Ružomberok.
17. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotová, V., Banaszak, I., Slaviková, L., Trifunovova, S., From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of central and eastern european transition countries. Environ. Policy Govern. 19 (2009), 186–196.
18. Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotová, V., Smolková, E., The challenges of policy convergence: the Europeanization of biodiversity governance in an enlarging EU. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 31 (2013), 401–413.
19. Kluvánková, T., Brnkaľáková, S., Managing Climate Change: Forest Commons for Well Being of Mountain Regions. Managing Environmental Goods under the Global Change: Approaches and Methods. 2015, Universita J.E. Purkyne, Ústí nad Labem, 86–130.
20. Leach, M., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Glob. Environ. Change 20:3 (2010), 369–377.
21. McCarthy, J., Zahari, Z., Regulating the oil palm boom: assessing the effectiveness of environmental governance approaches to agro-industrial pollution in Indonesia. Law Policy 32:1 (2010), 153–179.
22. Moravčík, M., Sarvašová, Z., Merganič, J., Schwarcz, M., Forest naturalness: criterion for decision support in the designation and management of protected forest areas. Environ. Manag.(46), 2010, 908–919.
23. Netting, R.M., Of men and meadows: strategies of alpine land use. Anthropol. Q 45 (1972), 132–144.
24. Nozicka, J., Prehled vývoje nasich lesu, 23. 1956, Lesnicka knihovna, Praha.
25. Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Ostrom, E., Scales, Polycentricity and Incentives: Designing Complexity to Govern Complexity. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analyses. 1998, Indiana University, 150–167.
27. Ostrom, E., Understanding the diversity of structured human interactions. Ostrom, E., (eds.) Understanding Institutional Diversity, 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
28. Ostrom, E., 2008. Polycentric Systems as One Approach for Solving Collective-Action Problems. Available at 〈SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304697〉.
29. Ostrom, E., A long polycentric journey. Annu. Rev. Politic. Sci. 13 (2010), 131–223.
30. Ostrom, E., Chang, C., Pennington, M., Tarko, V., The Future of the Commons: Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation. 2012, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London, UK, 111 (ISBN 978 0 255 36653 3).
31. Ostrom, E., Nagendra, H., Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:51 (2006), 19224–19231.
32. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. 1994, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
33. Poteete, A., Janssen, M., Ostrom, E., Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. 2010, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. Premrl, T., Udovc, A., Bogataj, N., Krc, J., From restitution to revival: a case of commons re-establishment and restitution in Slovenia. For. Policy Econ., 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.00.
35. Rama, K., Theesfeld, I., The strengths and weaknesses of Albania's customary rules in natural resource management in the light of devolution policies. Quarter. J. Int. Agricult. 50:4 (2011), 369–387.
36. Sandker, M., Suwarno, A., Campbell, B.M., Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau. Indones. Ecol. Soc., 12(2), 2007, 37.
37. Sathirathai, S., Barbier, E.B., Valuing mangrove conservation in southern Thailand. Contempor. Econ. Policy 19:2 (2001), 109–122.
38. Štefanovič, M., 1999. Urbárske právo. Ekonomický poradca podnikateľa 6.
39. Šulek, R., Úrbarska sústava na území Slovenska do roku 1918. Acta Facultatis Forestalis 2 (2007), 163–172.
40. Twine, W., Siphugu, V., Moshe, D., Harvesting of communal resources by ‘outsiders’ in rural South Africa: a case of xenophobia or a real threat to sustainability?. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 10 (2003), 263–274.
41. Wilson, J.A., Steneck, R.S., Managing chaotic fisheries. Berkes, F., Folke, C., (eds.) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 390–413.
42. Young, O.R., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay and Scale. 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.