From restitution to revival: A case of commons re-establishment and restitution in Slovenia

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 59, Issue , 2015, Pages 19-26

  Premrl, Tine ^a   Udovč, Andrej ^a   Bogataj, Nevenka ^b   Krč, Janez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b Slovenian Institute for Adult Education   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Commons; Design principles; Legal framework; Re establishment; Restitution; Robustness; Transition

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMMONS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; LEGAL FRAMEWORKS; RESTITUTION; TRANSITION;

AGRICULTURE;

EID: 84939470478     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agrawal A. Common resources and institutional sustainability. The Drama of the Commons 2002, 41-85.
2. Ambrose-Oji B., Lawrence A., et al. Community based forest enterprises in Britain: Two organising typologies. Forest Policy Econ. 2015, 58:65-74.
3. Anderies J.M., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9:18.
4. Arnold J. "Community Forestry." Ten Years in Review. 1992, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
5. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation 1984, Basic Books, New York.
6. Baur I., Binder C.R. Adapting to socioeconomic developments by changing rules in the governance of common property pastures in the Swiss Alps. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(4).
7. Bogataj N., Krč J. A forest commons revival in Slovenia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2014, 27(8):867-881.
8. Bouriaud L., Schmithüsen F. Allocation of property rights on forests through ownership reform and forest policies in central and eastern European countries. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 2005, 156(8):297-305.
9. Britovšek M. Razkroj fevdalne agrarne strukture in prehod na individualizirano kmetijstvo na Kranjskem. Kronika (Ljubljana) 1960, 8(2):159-165.
10. Bromley D. The Commons, Property, and Common-Property Regimes. In Making the Commons Work 1992, ICS Press, San Fransisco.
11. Carlson J.M., Doyle J. Complexity and robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99(Suppl. 1):2538-2545.
12. Cellarius B. Property restitution and natural resource use in the Rhodope mountains, Bulgaria. Hann, C. and the Property Relations Group, The Postsocialist Agrarian Question: Property Relations and the Rural Condition, Münster, LIT 2003, 189-218.
13. Ciriacy-Wantrup S.V., Bishop R.C. Common property as a concept in natural resources policy. Nat. Resour. J. 1975, 15:713.
14. Cox M., Arnold G., et al. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(4):38.
15. Fay D., James D. The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution 2009, Routledge-Cavendish, New York.
16. Furness E., Harshaw H., et al. Community forestry in British Columbia: policy progression and public participation. Forest Policy Econ. 2015, 58:85-91.
17. Hafner A. (Ne)upravljanje s premoženjem članov agrarnih skupnosti. Pravna praksa 2011, 12:22.
18. Hajjar R., Kozak R.A., et al. Community forests for forest communities: integrating community-defined goals and practices in the design of forestry initiatives. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:158-167.
19. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968, 162(3859):1243-1248.
20. Hardin G. Extensions of "the tragedy of the commons". Science 1998, 280(5364):682-683.
21. Heller M. The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harv. Law Rev. 1998, 111(3):621-688.
22. Herbst P. Rural common property in Austria. X World Conference of IASCP, Oaxaca, Mexico 2004.
23. Kissling-Näf I., Volken T., et al. Common property and natural resources in the Alps: the decay of management structures?. Forest Policy Econ. 2002, 4(2):135-147.
24. Klemenčič V. Processes of deagrarization and urbanization of Slovene rural areas. Dela - Oddelek za geografijo Filozofske fakultete v Ljubljani 2002, 17:15.
25. Larson A.M., Cronkleton P., et al. Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America, Center for International Forestry Research Bogor, Indonesia 2008.
26. Lawrence A., Szabo A. Forest restitution in Romania: challenging the value systems of foresters and farmers. Paper Presented at the Conference on European Forests in Ethical Discourse 2005.
27. Lidestav G., Poudyal M., et al. Shareholder Perceptions of Individual and Common Benefits in Swedish Forest Commons 2013.
28. Lopes L.F.G., dos Santos Bento J.M.R., et al. Institutionalization of common land property in Portugal: tragic trends between "commons" and "anticommons". Land Use Policy 2013, 35:85-94.
29. Malovrh Š.P., Stirn L.Z., et al. Influence of ownership and property structure on willingness of private forest owners to cooperate. Šumarski list 2010, 134(3/4):139-149.
30. Mantescu L., Vasile M. Property reforms in rural Romania and community-based forests. Sociol. Român. 2009, (02):95-113.
31. Medved M., Matjašič D., et al. Private property conditions of Slovenian forests in 2010. Small Scale Forestry in a Changing World: Opportunities and Challenges and the Role of Extension and Technology Transfer, Bled, Slovenia, Slovenian Forestry Institute: Slovenia Forest Service 2010.
32. Nurrochmat D.R., Dharmawan A.H., et al. Contesting national and international forest regimes: Case of timber legality certification for community forests in Central Java, Indonesia. Forest Policy Econ. 2015, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.008.
33. Oravska T.K., Chobotova V. Shifting governance. Managing the commons: the case of Slovensky Raj National Park. Sociologia 2006, 38(3):221-244.
34. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. Ostrom E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The Nobel Prizes 2009 2009, Nobel Foundation, Stockholm.
36. Ostrom E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems [Nobel Prize lecture] 2009, Nobel Media, Stockholm, Sweden, (8 December. goo. gl/EbPm8O [accessed 24 April 2014]).
37. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325(5939):419-422.
38. Ostrom E., Ostrom V. The Drama of the Commons 2002, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
39. Ostrom E., Burger J., et al. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 1999, 284(5412):278-282.
40. Paletto A., Meo I., et al. Balancing wood market demand and common property rights: a case study of a community in the Italian Alps. J. For. Res. 2013, 1-10.
41. Petek F. Sprememba rabe tal v Slovenskem Alpskem prostoru 2005, Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana.
42. Petek F., Urbanc M. Skupna zemljišča v Sloveniji. Geogr. Vestn. 2007, 79(2):41-62.
43. Premrl T. Analiza stanja agrarnih skupnosti v Sloveniji na podlagi podatkov upravnih enot: ekpertiza 2013, 13. Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, Ljubljana.
44. Premrl T., Medved M., et al. Agrarian (forest) commons in Slovenia preliminary findings. Forest Commons - Role Model for Sustainable Local Governance and Forest Management: International Workshop, Burbach, Germany, Wald und Holz NR 2011.
45. Rodela R., Udovč A., et al. Soupravljanje naravnih virov: vaške skupnosti in sorodne oblike skupne lastnine in skupnega upravljanja 2012, Wageningen University and Research Centre.
46. Schulz N., Parisi F., et al. Fragmentation in property: towards a general model. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 2002, 158(4):594-613.
47. Schusser C., Krott M., et al. Community Forestry in Germany, a Case Study Seen Through the Lens of the International Model 2013.
48. Sikor T. Analyzing community-based forestry: local, political and agrarian perspectives. Forest Policy Econ. 2006, 8(4):339-349.
49. Sinha R. Common Property Resource Institutions Database & Online Information & Interaction System. S. Riya. 2015 2001.
50. To P.X., Mahanty S., et al. 'A new landlord' (d{stroke}i{dot below}a chu{hook above} mo{horn}i)? Community, land conflict and state forest companies (SFCs) in Vietnam. Forest Policy Econ. 2015, 58:21-28.
51. van Gils H., Siegl G., et al. The living commons of West Tyrol, Austria: lessons for land policy and land administration. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:16-25.
52. Wily L.A. Forest Law in Eastern and Southern Africa: Moving Towards a Community-based Forest Future? 2000, 19-26. UNASYLVA-FAO.
53. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
54. ZPVAS Act on Reestablishment of Agricultural Communities and Restitution of Their pRoperty and Rights. 5/1994. U. l. RS 1994.