Participatory selection of ecosystem services for spatial planning: Insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 18, Issue , 2016, Pages 87-99

  Mascarenhas, André ^a,b   Ramos, Tomás B ^a   Haase, Dagmar ^b,c   Santos, Rui ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Governance; Participation; Spatial planning; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959017652     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abson D.J., von Wehrden H., Baumgärtner S., Fischer J., Hanspach J., Härdtle W., Heinrichs H., Klein A.M., Lang D.J., Martens P., Walmsley D. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 103:29-37. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
2. Anastasopoulou, S., Chobotova, V., Dawson, T., Kluvankova-Oravska, T., Rounsevell, M. Identifying and assessing socio-economic and environmental drivers that affect ecosystems and their services. The RUBICODE Project report. Available at: 〈〉. http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Review_on_Drivers.pdf.
3. Aretano R., Petrosillo I., Zaccarelli N., Semeraro T., Zurlini G. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: a combination of subjective and objective assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 112:63-73. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.010.
4. Bastian O., Haase D., Grunewald K. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:7-16. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014.
5. Brown G., de Bie K., Weber D. Identifying public land stakeholder perspectives for implementing place-based land management. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 139:1-15. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.003.
6. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., Macdonald D.H. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97:111-122. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002.
7. Bryson J.M. What to do when stakeholders matter - stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag. Rev. 2004, 6:21-53. 10.1080/14719030410001675722.
8. Caetano, M., Nunes, V., Nunes, A., 2009. CORINE Land Cover 2006 for Continental Portugal. Technical Report. Instituto Geográfico Português.
9. Campo S. Sustainability assessment of urban policy scenarios: analysing the impacts of land use-transportation interaction in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Rev. Int. Sostenibilidad Tecnol. Humanismo 2009, 4:125-149.
10. Cárcamo P.F., Garay-Flühmann R., Squeo F.A., Gaymer C.F. Using stakeholders' perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 40:116-131. 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.003.
11. Castro A.J., Verburg P.H., Martín-López B., Garcia-Llorente M., Cabello J., Vaughn C.C., López E. Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 132:102-110. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009.
12. Chan K.M.A., Guerry A.D., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T., Basurto X., Bostrom A., Chuenpagdee R., Gould R., Halpern B.S., Hannahs N., Levine J., Norton B., Ruckelshaus M., Russell R., Tam J., Woodside U. Where are Cultural and Social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 2012, 62:744-756. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
13. Costa, E.M., Rocha, J., Rodrigues, M., 2009. Urban form analysis employing land cover and spatial metrics - the case of Lisbon Metropolitan Area. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Virtual City and Territory.
14. Daily G.C. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 2000, 3:333-339. 10.1016/s1462-9011(00)00102-7.
15. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
16. EEA, 2011. An Experimental Framework for Ecosystem Capital Accounting in Europe. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
17. European Commission, 2013. Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital, Brussels.
18. Faehnle M., Bäcklund P., Tyrväinen L., Niemelä J., Yli-Pelkonen V. How can residents' experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 130:171-183. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012.
19. Fitzsimons J., Pearson C.J., Lawson C., Hill M.J. Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 106:23-34. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.012.
20. Fontaine C.M., Dendoncker N., De Vreese R., Jacquemin I., Marek A., Van Herzele A., Devillet G., Mortelmans D., François L. Towards participatory integrated valuation and modelling of ecosystem services under land-use change. J. Land Use Sci. 2013, 9:278-303. 10.1080/1747423X.2013.786150.
21. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach 1984, Pitman, Boston.
22. García-Nieto A.P., Quintas-Soriano C., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Montes C., Martín-López B. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders[U+05F3] profiles. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 13:141-152. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006.
23. Geneletti D. Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011, 7:143-149. 10.1080/21513732.2011.617711.
24. Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R. Natural capital and ecosystem services: the ecological foundation of human society. Ecosystem Services 2010, 105-121. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. R.E. Hester, R.M. Harrison (Eds.).
25. Granek E.F., Polasky S., Kappel C.V., Reed D.J., Stoms D.M., Koch E.W., Kennedy C.J., Cramer L.A., Hacker S.D., Barbier E.B., Aswani S., Ruckelshaus M., Perillo G.M.E., Silliman B.R., Muthiga N., Bael D., Wolanski E. Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:207-216. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01355.x.
26. Grimble R., Wellard K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 1997, 55:173-193. 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1.
27. Haase A., Rink D., Grossmann K., Bernt M., Mykhnenko V. Conceptualizing urban shrinkage. Environ. Plan. A 2014, 46:1519-1534.
28. Haase D., Larondelle N., Andersson E., Artmann M., Borgström S., Breuste J., Gomez-Baggethun E., Gren Å., Hamstead Z., Hansen R., Kabisch N., Kremer P., Langemeyer J., Rall E., McPhearson T., Pauleit S., Qureshi S., Schwarz N., Voigt A., Wurster D., Elmqvist T. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. AMBIO 2014, 43:413-433. 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
29. Haase D., Nuissl H. Assessing the impacts of land use change on transforming regions. J. Land Use Sci. 2010, 5:67-72. 10.1080/1747423x.2010.481074.
30. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2010, European Environment Agency, Nottingham.
31. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Jax K. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 25:13-21. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001.
32. Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., van Ierland E.C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:209-228. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
33. Hubacek K., Kronenberg J. Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109:1-6. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010.
34. Jacobs S., Dendoncker N., Keune H. Editorial for ecosystem services: global issues, local practices. Ecosystem Services: Global Issues, Local Practices 2014, 19-28. Elsevier, San Diego, CA. S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, H. Keune (Eds.).
35. Janis I.L. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes 1972, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
36. Kaczorowska A., Kain J.-H., Kronenberg J., Haase D. Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: integration challenges in complex urban settings - case of Stockholm. Ecosyst. Serv 2015, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006.
37. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:54-66. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
38. Koschke L., Van der Meulen S., Frank S., Schneidergruber A., Kruse M., Fürst C., Neubert E., Schröder C., Müller F., Bastian O. Do you have 5 minutes to spare? - The challenges of stakeholder processes in ecosystem services studies. Landsc. Online 2014, 37:1-25.
39. Larondelle N., Haase D. Valuing post-mining landscapes using an ecosystem services approach - an example from Germany. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:567-574. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.008.
40. Larondelle N., Haase D., Kabisch N. Mapping the diversity of regulating ecosystem services in European cities. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26:119-129. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.008.
41. Lienhoop N., Bartkowski B., Hansjürgens B. Informing biodiversity policy: the role of economic valuation, deliberative institutions and deliberative monetary valuation. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54:522-532. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.007.
42. Liu J., Opdam P. Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29:1347-1360. 10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8.
43. Liu S., Costanza R., Troy A., D'Aagostino J., Mates W. Valuing New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit benefit transfer approach. Environ. Manag. 2010, 45:1271-1285. 10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5.
44. Luederitz C., Brink E., Gralla F., Hermelingmeier V., Meyer M., Niven L., Panzer L., Partelow S., Rau A.-L., Sasaki R., Abson D.J., Lang D.J., Wamsler C., von Wehrden H. A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 14:98-112. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001.
45. MA Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
46. MA Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC.
47. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:19-26. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.
48. Maes J., Barbosa A., Baranzelli C., Zulian G., Batista e Silva F., Vandecasteele I., Hiederer R., Liquete C., Paracchini M., Mubareka S., Jacobs-Crisioni C., Castillo C., Lavalle C. More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 30:517-534. 10.1007/s10980-014-0083-2.
49. Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, C., Santos, F., Paracchini, M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J., Fiala, I., Verburg, P.H., Condé, S., Schargner, J.P., San Miguel, J., Estreguil, C., Ostermann, O., Barredo, J.I., Pereira, H.M., Stott, A., Laporte, V., Meiner, A., Olah, B., Royo Gelabert, E., Spyropoulou, R., Petersen, J.E., Maguire, C., Zal, N., Achilleos, E., Rubin, A., Ledoux, L., Brown, C., Raes, C., Jacobs, S., Vandewalle, M., Connor, D., Bidoglio, G., 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
50. Malinga R., Gordon L.J., Lindborg R., Jewitt G. Using participatory scenario planning to identify ecosystem services in changing landscapes. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18. 10.5751/ES-05494-180410.
51. Mascarenhas A., Nunes L.M., Ramos T.B. Exploring the self-assessment of sustainability indicators by different stakeholders. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 39:75-83. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.001.
52. Menzel S., Teng J. Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:907-909. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01347.x.
53. Namaalwa S., Van dam A.A., Funk A., Ajie G.S., Kaggwa R.C. A characterization of the drivers, pressures, ecosystem functions and services of Namatala wetland, Uganda. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 34:44-57. 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.002.
54. Nelson G.C., Janetos A., Bennet E. Drivers of change in ecosystem condition and services. Scenarios Assessment of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005, 174-222. Island Press, London. S.R. Carpenter, L.P. Pingali, M.E. Bennett, M.B. Zurek (Eds.).
55. Nieto-Romero M., Oteros-Rozas E., González J.A., Martín-López B. Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: insights for future research. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 37:121-133. 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.003.
56. Nuissl, H., Rink, D., Couch, C., Karecha, C., 2008. Decline and Sprawl: Urban Sprawl is not Confined to Expanding City Regions. In: Urban Sprawl in Europe. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 136-162. Doi: . http://10.1002/9780470692066.ch5.
57. O'Toole K., Wallis A., Mitchell B. Local perceptions of sustainability indicators: issues of scale and implications for management. Rural Soc. 2006, 16:25-46. 10.5172/rsj.351.16.1.25.
58. Orenstein D.E., Groner E. In the eye of the stakeholder: changes in perceptions of ecosystem services across an international border. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 8:185-196. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.004.
59. Pascual U., Muradian R., Brander L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Verma M., Armsworth P., Christie M., Cornelissen H., Eppink F., Farley J., Loomis J., Pearson L., Perrings C., Polasky S. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan, London and Washington. P. Kumar (Ed.).
60. Paudyal K., Baral H., Burkhard B., Bhandari S.P., Keenan R.J. Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 13:81-92. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007.
61. Podestá G.P., Natenzon C.E., Hidalgo C., Ruiz Toranzo F. Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: a case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 26:40-48. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.008.
62. Ramirez-Gomez S.O.I., Torres-Vitolas C.A., Schreckenberg K., Honzák M., Cruz-Garcia G.S., Willcock S., Palacios E., Pérez-Miñana E., Verweij P.A., Poppy G.M. Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 13:93-107. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.009.
63. Rea L.M., Parker R.A. Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide 1997, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. 2nd ed.
64. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
65. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
66. Rodríguez J.P., Beard J.T.D., Bennett E.M., Cumming G.S., Cork S.J., Agard J., Dobson A.P., Peterson G.D. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11.
67. Rodríguez-Rodríguez D., Kain J.H., Haase D., Baró F., Kaczorowska A. Urban self-sufficiency through optimised ecosystem service demand. A utopian perspective from European cities. Futures 2015, 70:13-23. 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.007.
68. Rosenthal A., Verutes G., McKenzie E., Arkema K.K., Bhagabati N., Bremer L.L., Olwero N., Vogl A.L. Process matters: a framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2014, 1-15. 10.1080/21513732.2014.966149.
69. Ruckelshaus M., McKenzie E., Tallis H., Guerry A., Daily G., Kareiva P., Polasky S., Ricketts T., Bhagabati N., Wood S.A., Bernhardt J. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 115:11-21. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
70. Ryan R.L. The social landscape of planning: integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 100:361-363. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.015.
71. Sagoff M. The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:497-502. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006.
72. Schröter D., Cramer W., Leemans R., Prentice I.C., Araújo M.B., Arnell N.W., Bondeau A., Bugmann H., Carter T.R., Gracia C.A., de la Vega-Leinert A.C., Erhard M., Ewert F., Glendining M., House J.I., Kankaanpää S., Klein R.J.T., Lavorel S., Lindner M., Metzger M.J., Meyer J., Mitchell T.D., Reginster I., Rounsevell M., Sabaté S., Sitch S., Smith B., Smith J., Smith P., Sykes M.T., Thonicke K., Thuiller W., Tuck G., Zaehle S., Zierl B. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 2005, 80(310):1333-1337. 10.1126/science.1115233.
73. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
74. Söderman T., Kopperoinen L., Shemeikka P., Yli-Pelkonen V. Ecosystem services criteria for sustainable development in urban regions. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag. 2012, 14:1250008. 10.1142/S1464333212500081.
75. Spangenberg J.H., Görg C., Truong D.T., Tekken V., Bustamante J.V., Settele J. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2014, 10:40-53. 10.1080/21513732.2014.884166.
76. Spangenberg J.H., Settele J. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:327-337. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007.
77. Spash C.L. Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:690-699. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014.
78. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
79. Weber M.A., Ringold P.L. Priority river metrics for residents of an urbanized arid watershed. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 133:37-52. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.006.
80. Yin R.K. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish 2011, The Guilford Press, New York.
81. Zorrilla-Miras P., Palomo I., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Lomas P.L., Montes C. Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 122:160-174. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.013.