Publication bias in the neighbourhood effects literature

Geoforum

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 89-92

  Nieuwenhuis, Jaap ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; META-ANALYSIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; POLICY MAKING; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84958999067     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.017     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Atkinson R., Kintrea K. Owner-occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy Polit. 2000, 28(1):93-108.
2. Blokland T., van Eijk G. Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neighbourhood life?. J. Ethn. Migrat. Stud. 2010, 36(2):313-332. 10.1080/13691830903387436.
3. Dietz R.D. The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach. Soc. Sci. Res. 2002, 31:539-575.
4. Durlauf S.N. Neighbourhood effects. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics: Cities and Geography 2004, vol. 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Dwan K., Gamble C., Williamson P.R., Kirkham J.J. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(7):e66844. for the Reporting Bias Group. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844.
6. Ellen I.G., Turner M.A. Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Hous. Policy Debate 1997, 8(4):833-866.
7. Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(4):e10271. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
8. Fanelli D. "Positive" results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(4):e10068. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010068.
9. Galster G. An economic efficiency analysis of deconcentrating poverty populations. J. Hous. Econ. 2002, 11(4):303-329.
10. Gerber A.S., Malhotra N. Publication bias in empirical sociological research: do arbitrary significance levels distort published results?. Sociol. Methods Res. 2008, 37(1):3-30.
11. Gerber A., Malhotra N. Do statistical reporting standards affect what is published? Publication bias in two leading political science journals. Quart. J. Polit. Sci. 2008, 3:313-326.
12. Hedman L., Galster G. Neighbourhood income sorting and the effects of neighbourhood income mix on income: a holistic empirical exploration. Urban Stud. 2013, 50(1):107-127.
13. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005, 2(8):e124. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
14. Kleinhans R. Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: a review of recent literature. J. Hous. Built Environ. 2004, 19(4):367-390.
15. Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems? A Policy Brief 2013, Springer, Dordrecht. D. Manley, M. van Ham, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, D. Maclennan (Eds.).
16. Musterd S., Andersson R. Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities. Urban Aff. Rev. 2005, 40(6):761-790.
17. Nieuwenhuis J., Hooimeijer P. The association between neighbourhoods and educational achievement, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hous. Built Environ. 2015, (online first). 10.1007/s10901-015-9460-7.
18. Slater T. Capitalist urbanisation affects your life chances: exorcising the ghosts of 'neighbourhood effects'. Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems? A Policy Brief 2013, 113-132. Springer, Dordrecht. D. Manley, M. van Ham, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, D. Maclennan (Eds.).
19. Sterne J.A.C., Smith G.D. Sifting the evidence - what's wrong with significance tests?. BMJ 2001, 332:226-231.
20. van Ham M., Manley D. Neighbourhood effects research at a crossroads. Ten challenges for future research. Environ. Plan. A 2012, 44:2787-2793.
21. Wilson W.J. The Truly Disadvantaged. The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy 1987, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.