Neighbourhood Income Sorting and the Effects of Neighbourhood Income Mix on Income: A Holistic Empirical Exploration

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 107-127

  Hedman, Lina ^a   Galster, George ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; HOLISTIC APPROACH; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; NEIGHBORHOOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PANEL DATA; PARAMETERIZATION; URBAN ECONOMY;

STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

EID: 84871384188     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012452320     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson E.Från sorgedalen till glädjehöjden: omgivningens betydelse för socioekonomisk karriär. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University; 2001:.
2. Andersson R.Socio-spatial dynamics: ethnic divisions of mobility and housing in post-Palme Sweden.Urban Studies. 1998;35:397-428.
3. Andersson R.,Bråmå Å.Selective migration in Swedish distressed neighbourhoods: can area-based urban policies counteract segregation processes?.Housing Studies. 2004;19:517-539.
4. Andersson R.,Musterd S.,Galster G.,Kauppinen T.What mix matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals' incomes and different measures of their neighborhood context.Housing Studies. 2007;22:637-660.
5. Berube A.Mixed communities in England: a U.S. perspective on evidence and policy proposals. York.: Joseph Rountree Foundation; 2005:.
6. The Geography of Opportunity. Briggs X., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2005:.
7. Cheshire P.Are mixed-income communities the answer to segregation and poverty?. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2007:.
8. Doff W.Puzzling Neighbourhood Effects. Amsterdam: IOS Press, BV; 2010:.
9. Galster G.Investigating behavioral impacts of poor neighborhoods: towards new data and analytic strategies.Housing Studies. 2003;18:893-914.
10. Galster G.Quantifying the effect of neighbourhood on individuals: challenges, alternative approaches and promising directions.Journal of Applied Social Science Studies. 2008;128:7-48.
11. Galster G.Neighbourhood Effects Research: Theory and Evidence. van Ham M.Manley D.Bailey N.Simpson L.Maclennan D., ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012:23-56.
12. GalsterG.HedmanL. (2011) Alternative ways of measuring neighborhood effects: do methods matter?Unpublished paper, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Wayne State University, Detroit.
13. Galster G.,Andersson R.,Musterd S. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference; 2010Boston, MA; 2010.
14. Galster G.,Andersson R.,Musterd S.,Kauppinen T.Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;63:858-870.
15. Galster G.,Marcotte D.,Mandell M.,Wolman H.,Augustine N.The influence of neighborhood poverty during childhood on fertility, education and earnings outcomes.Housing Studies. 2007;22:723-752.
16. Gennetian L.,Ludwig J.,Sanbonmatsu L.Neighborhood and Life Chances: How Place Matters in Modern America. Newburger H.Birch E.Wachter S., ed. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2011:163-178.
17. Ham M. van,Manley D.The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: a longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects.Journal of Economic Geography. 2010;10:257-282.
18. Hedman L.The impact of residential mobility on measurements of neighbourhood effects.Housing Studies. 2011;26:501-519.
19. Hedman L.,Ham M. vanNeighbourhood Effects Research: Theory and Evidence. van Ham M.Manley D.Bailey N.Simpson L.Maclennan D., ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012:79-99.
20. Hedman L.,Ham M. van,Manley D.Neighbourhood choice and neighbourhood reproduction.Environment and Planning A. 2011;43:1381-1399.
21. Ihlanfeldt K. R.,Sjoquist D. L.The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform.Housing Policy Debate. 1998;9:849-892.
22. Ioannides Y.,Zabel J.Interactions, neighbourhood selection and housing demand.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;63:229-252.
23. Jargowsky P.Poverty and Place. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997:.
24. Jencks C.,Mayer S.Inner-city Poverty in the United States. Lynn L.McGeary M., ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990:111-186.
25. Ludwig J.,Duncan G.,Hirschfield P.Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2001;116:655-679.
26. Murie A.,Musterd S.Social exclusion and opportunity structures in European cities and neighbourhoods.Urban Studies. 2004;41:1425-1443.
27. Murray M.Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006;20:111-132.
28. Musterd S.,Andersson R.Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities.Urban Affairs Review. 2005;40:761-790.
29. Musterd S.,Galster G.,Andersson R.Temporal dimensions of neighbourhood effects.Environment and Planning A. 2012;44 (3): 605-627.
30. Norris M.Developing, designing and managing mixed tenure housing estates.European Planning Studies. 2006;14:199-218.
31. Sampson R.,Sharkey P.Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality.Demography. 2008;45:1-29.
32. Sari F.Analysis of neighbourhood effects and work behaviour: evidence from Paris.Housing Studies. 2012;:45-76.
33. Smolensky E.Children in the vanguard of the U.S. welfare state.Journal of Economic Literature. 2007;45:1011-1023.
34. Urban S.Is the neighbourhood effect an economic or an immigrant issue? A study of the importance of the childhood neighbourhood for future integration into the labour market.Urban Studies. 2009;46:583-603.