Environmental factors that shape biofilm formation

Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 7-12

  Toyofuku, Masanori ^a   Inaba, Tomohiro ^a   Kiyokawa, Tatsunori ^a   Obana, Nozomu ^a   Yawata, Yutaka ^b   Nomura, Nobuhiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Environment; Quorum sensing

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT; BIOFILM FORMATION; BIOFILM STRUCTURE; CELL-TO-CELL COMMUNICATION; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; LOCAL CONDITIONS; QUORUM-SENSING;

BIOFILMS;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BIS(3',5')-CYCLIC DIGUANYLIC ACID; CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC GMP;

ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; QUORUM SENSING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SECOND MESSENGER; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VIBRIO CHOLERAE;

BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BIOFILMS; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC GMP; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; QUORUM SENSING; SECOND MESSENGER SYSTEMS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VIBRIO CHOLERAE;

EID: 84958982309     PISSN: 09168451     EISSN: 13476947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2015.1058701     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010; 8: 623-633.
2. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000; 54: 49-79.
3. Westall F, de Wit MJ, Dann J, Van Der Gaast S, de Ronde CEJ, Gerneke D. Early Archean fossil bacteria and biofilms in hydrothermally-influenced sediments from the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa. Precambrian Res. 2001; 106: 93-116.
4. Lerchner J, Wolf A, Buchholz F, et al. Miniaturized calorimetry -A new method for real-time biofilm activity analysis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2008; 74: 74-81.
5. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW. Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002; 56: 187-209.
6. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002; 15: 167-193.
7. Nickel JC, Ruseska I, Wright JB, Costerton JW. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985; 27: 619-624.
8. Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 945-953.
9. Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Sociomicrobiology: The connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2005; 13: 27-33.
10. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004; 2: 95-108.
11. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: A genetic analysis. Mol. Microbiol. 1998; 28: 449-461.
12. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998; 30: 295-304.
13. Petrova OE, Sauer K. Sticky situations: Key components that control bacterial surface attachment. J. Bacteriol. 2012; 194: 2413-2425.
14. Caiazza NC, O'Toole GA. SadB is required for the transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol. 2004; 186: 4476-4485.
15. Hinsa SM, Espinosa-Urgel M, Ramos JL, O'Toole GA. Transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 requires an ABC transporter and a large secreted protein. Mol. Microbiol. 2003; 49: 905-918.
16. Ono K, Oka R, Toyofuku M, et al. cAMP signaling affects irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbes Environ. 2014; 29: 104-106.
17. McDonough KA, Rodriguez A. The myriad roles of cyclic AMP in microbial pathogens: From signal to sword. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012; 10: 27-38.
18. Yawata Y, Cordero OX, Menolascina F, Hehemann JH, Polz MF, Stocker R. Competition-dispersal tradeoff ecologically differentiates recently speciated marine bacterioplankton populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014; 111: 5622-5627.
19. Zhao K, Tseng B, Beckerman B, et al. Psl trails guide exploration and microcolony formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2013; 497: 388-391.
20. Drescher K, Nadell CD, Stone HA, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. Solutions to the public goods dilemma in bacterial biofilms. Curr. Biol. 2014; 24: 50-55.
21. Stoodley P, Debeer D, Lewandowski Z. Liquid flow in biofilm systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994; 60: 2711-2716.
22. Wilking JN, Zaburdaev V, De Volder M, Losick R, Brenner MP, Weitz DA. Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013; 110: 848-852.
23. Yawata Y, Nomura N, Uchiyama H. Development of a novel biofilm continuous culture method for simultaneous assessment of architecture and gaseous metabolite production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008; 74: 5429-5435.
24. Fang H, Toyofuku M, Kiyokawa T, Ichihashi A, Tateda K, Nomura N. The impact of anaerobiosis on strain-dependent phenotypic variations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013; 77: 1747-1752.
25. Hamada M, Toyofuku M, Miyano T, Nomura N. cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidases, aerobic respiratory enzymes, impact the anaerobic life of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 2014; 196: 3881-3889.
26. Obana N, Nakamura K, Nomura N. A sporulation factor is involved in the morphological change of Clostridium perfringens biofilms in response to temperature. J. Bacteriol. 2014; 196: 1540-1550.
27. Boles BR, Singh PK. Endogenous oxidative stress produces diversity and adaptability in biofilm communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008; 105: 12503-12508.
28. McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S. Should we stay or should we go: Mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012; 10: 39-50.
29. Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: The first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013; 77: 1-52.
30. Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: The LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 1994; 176: 269-275.
31. Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing: Its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012; 2: A012427.
32. Bassler BL, Losick R. Bacterially speaking. Cell. 2006; 125: 237-246.
33. Schuster M, Sexton DJ, Diggle SP, Greenberg EP. Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: From evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013; 67: 43-63.
34. Toyofuku M, Nomura N, Fujii T, et al. Quorum sensing regulates denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 2007; 189: 4969-4972.
35. Toyofuku M, Nomura N, Kuno E, Tashiro Y, Nakajima T, Uchiyama H. Influence of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal on denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 7947-7956.
36. Tashiro Y, Ichikawa S, Shimizu M, et al. Variation of physiochemical properties and cell association activity of membrane vesicles with growth phase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010; 76: 3732-3739.
37. Tashiro Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Multifunctional membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 2012; 14: 1349-1662.
38. Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998; 280: 295-298.
39. Boles BR, Horswill AR. agr-Mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008; 4: E1000052.
40. Zhu J, Mekalanos JJ. Quorum sensing-dependent biofilms enhance colonization in Vibrio cholera. Dev. Cell. 2003; 5: 647-656.
41. de Kievit TR. Quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 2009; 11: 279-288.
42. Toyofuku M, Roschitzki B, Riedel K, Eberl L. Identification of proteins associated with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm extracellular matrix. J. Proteome Res. 2012; 11: 4906-4915.
43. Korber DR, Lawrence JR, Sutton B, Caldwell DE. The effect of laminar flow on the kinetics of surface recolonization by mott and mot- Pseudomonas fluorescens. Microb. Ecol. 1989; 18: 1-19.
44. Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE. Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 1991; 173: 6558-6567.
45. Palmer RJ, Sternberg C. Modern microscopy in biofilm research: Confocal microscopy and other approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999; 10: 263-268.
46. Korber DR, Wolfaardt GM, Brözel V, MacDonald R, Niepel T. Reporter systems for microscopic analysis of microbial biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999; 310: 3-20.
47. McLean RJ, Bates CCL, Barnes MB, McGowin CL, Aron GM. Methods of studying biofilms. In: Ghannoum M, O'Tool GA, editors. Microbial biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004. p. 379-413.
48. Yawata Y, Toda K, Setoyama E, et al. Monitoring biofilm development in a microfluidic device using modified confocal reflection microscopy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010; 110: 377-380.
49. Inaba T, Ichihara T, Yawata Y, Toyofuku M, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Three- dimensional visualization of mixed species biofilm formation together with its substratum. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013; 57: 589-593.
50. Yawata Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Visualizing the effects of biofilm structures on the influx of fluorescent material using combined confocal reflection and fluorescent microscopy. Microbes Environ. 2010; 25: 49-52.
51. Zhu Y, Weiss EC, Otto M, Fey PD, Smeltzer MS, Somerville GA. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm metabolism and the influence of arginine on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2007; 75: 4219-4226.
52. Rusconi R, Garren M, Stocker R. Microfluidics expanding the frontiers of microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014; 43: 65-91.
53. Richter L, Stepper C, Mak A, et al. Development of a microfluidic biochip for online monitoring of fungal biofilm dynamics. Lab Chip. 2007; 7: 1723-1731.
54. Toda K, Yawata Y, Setoyama E, Fukuda J, Nomura N, Suzuki H. Continuous monitoring of ammonia removal activity and observation of morphology of microbial complexes in a microdevice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011; 77: 4253-4255.
55. Yawata Y, Toda K, Setoyama E, et al. Bacterial growth monitoring in a microfluidic device by confocal reflection microscopy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010; 110: 130-133.
56. Kim J, Park HD, Chung S. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules. 2012; 17: 9818-9834.
57. Wessel AK, Hmelo L, Parsek MR, Whiteley M. Going local: Technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013; 11: 337-348.
58. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science. 2002; 297: 1183-1186.
59. Williamson KS, Richards LA, Perez-Osorio AC, et al. Heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms includes expression of ribosome hibernation factors in the antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation and hypoxia-induced stress response in the metabolically active population. J. Bacteriol. 2012; 194: 2062-2073.
60. Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 945-953.
61. Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007; 5: 48-56.