The tools of policy formulation: New perspectives and new challenges

The Tools of Policy Formulation: Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 267-293

  Jordan, Andrew J ^a   Turnpenny, John R ^a   Rayner, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958899910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783477043.00026     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Bähr, H. (2010), The Politics of Means and Ends, Farnham: Ashgate.
2. Benson, D. and A.J. Jordan (2011), ‘What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited’, Political Studies Review, 9 (3), 366-378.
3. Cash, D., W. Clark, F. Alcock, N. Dickson, N. Eckley and J. Jager (2002), Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making. Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP02-046, Harvard: John F. Kennedy School of Government.
4. Craft, J. and M. Howlett (2012), ‘Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems’, Journal of Public Policy, 32 (2), 79-98.
5. Dahl, R. and C. Lindblom (1953), Politics, Economics and Welfare, New York: Harpers.
6. de Ridder, W., J. Turnpenny, M. Nilsson and A. von Raggamby (2007), ‘A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9, 423-441.
7. Doern, B. and R. Phidd (1992), Canadian Public Policy: Ideas, Structure, Process, Toronto, ON: Nelson.
8. Dunlop, C. (2014), ‘The possible experts: how epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy’, Environment and Planning C, 32 (2), 208-228.
9. Dunn, W. (2004), Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
10. Eliadis, P., M. Hill and M. Howlett (2007), ‘Introduction’, in P. Eliadis, M. Hill and M. Howlett (eds), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, Montreal: McGill Queens University Press, pp. 3-20.
11. Froud, J., R. Boden, A. Ogus and P. Stubbs (1998), Controlling the Regulators, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
12. Goodin, R., M. Moran and M. Rein (2006), ‘The public and its policies’, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R. Goodin (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-35.
13. Haines-Young, R. and M. Potschin (2014), ‘The ecosystems approach as a framework for understanding knowledge utilisation’, Environment and Planning C, 32 (2), 301-319.
14. Hajer, M. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hertin, J., J. Turnpenny, M. Jordan, A. Nilsson, B. Nykvist and D. Russel (2009), ‘Rationalising the policy mess? The role of ex ante policy assessment and the utilization of knowledge in the policy process’, Environment and Planning A, 41 (5), 1185-1200.
16. Hill, M. (2009), The Public Policy Process, 5th edition, Abingdon: Routledge.
17. Hood, C. (1983), The Tools of Government, London: Macmillan.
18. Howlett, M. (2000), ‘Managing the hollow state. Procedural policy instruments and modern governance’, Canadian Public Administration, 43 (4), 412-431.
19. Howlett, M. (2011), Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments, Abingdon: Routledge.
20. Howlett, M. and R. Lejano (2013), ‘Tales from the crypt: the rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design’, Administration and Society, 45 (3), 357-381.
21. Howlett, M., J.J. Woo and I. Mukherjee (2014), ‘From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research’, Policy and Politics, 42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596.
22. Jenkins, J. and E. Patashnik (eds) (2012), Living Legislation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Jordan, A. and E. Matt (2014), ‘Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate’, Policy Sciences, 47 (3), 227-247.
24. Jordan, A. and A. Schout (2006), The Coordination of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Jordan, A., R. Wurzel and A. Zito (2013), ‘Still the century of “new” environmental policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity’, Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 155-173.
26. Kassim, H. and P. Le Gales (2010), ‘Exploring governance in a multi-level polity’, West European Politics, 33 (1), 1-22.
27. Lascoumes, P. and P. Le Gales (2007), ‘Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments’, Governance, 20 (1), 1-22.
28. Linder, S. and B.G. Peters (1989), ‘Instruments of government’, Journal of Public Policy, 9 (1), 35-58.
29. Lowi, T. (1972), ‘Four systems of policy, politics and choice’, Public Administration Review, 32 (4), 298-310.
30. Matthews, F. (2012), ‘Governance and state capacity’, in D. Levi-Faur (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 281-293.
31. Mayer, I.S., C.E. van Daalen and P.W.G. Bots (2004), ‘Perspectives on policy analyses’, International Journal of Policy and Management, 4 (2), 169-191.
32. Meltsner, A.J. (1976), Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy, Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Mintrom, M. and C. Williams (2013), ‘Public policy debate and the rise of policy analysis’, in E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh and X. Wu (eds), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, London: Routledge, pp. 3-16.
34. Nilsson, M., A. Jordan, J. Turnpenny, J. Hertin, B. Nykvist and D. Russel (2008), ‘The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making’, Policy Sciences, 41 (4), 335-355.
35. Owens, S. and R. Cowell (2002), Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process, London and New York: Routledge.
36. Owens, S., T. Rayner and O. Bina (2004), ‘New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice and research’, Environment and Planning A, 36, 1943-1959.
37. Peters, B.G. (2002), ‘The politics of choice’, in L. Salamon (ed.), Tools of Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 552-564.
38. Radaelli, C. (1995), ‘The role of knowledge in the policy process’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2, 159-183.
39. Radaelli, C. (2004), ‘The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis: best practice or lesson-drawing?', European Journal of Political Research, 43, 723-747.
40. Radaelli, C. (2007), ‘Whither better regulation for the Lisbon Agenda?', Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 190-207.
41. Radaelli, C. and F. de Francesco (2010), ‘Regulatory impact assessment’, in R. Baldwin, M. Cave and M. Lodge (eds), Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: OUP, pp. 279-301.
42. Radaelli, C. and A. Meuwese (2010), ‘Hard questions, hard solutions: procedur-alisation through impact assessment’, West European Politics, 33 (1), 136-153.
43. Radin, B. (2013), Beyond Machiavelli, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
44. Russel, D. and A. Jordan (2009), ‘Joining up or pulling apart? The use of appraisal to coordinate policy making for sustainable development’, Environment and Planning A, 41 (5), 1201-1216.
45. Salamon, L. (1989), Beyond Privatisation, Washington: Urban Institute Press.
46. Salamon, L. (2002), ‘The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction’, in L. Salamon (ed.), Tools of Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-47.
47. Schick, A. (1977), ‘Beyond analysis’, Public Administration Review, 37 (3), 258-263.
48. Self, P. (1981), ‘Planning: rational or political?', in P. Baehr and B. Wittrock (eds), Policy Analysis and Policy Innovation, London: Sage, pp. 221-236.
49. Stirling, A. (2008), '“Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 33 (2), 262-294.
50. Thatcher, M. and A. Stone Sweet (eds) (2002), The Politics of Delegation, London: Routledge.
51. Turnpenny, J., D. Russel and A.J. Jordan (2014), ‘The challenge of embedding an ecosystems approach: patterns of knowledge utilisation in public policy appraisal’, Environment and Planning C, 32 (2), 247-262.
52. Turnpenny, J., C.M. Radaelli, A. Jordan and K. Jacob (2009), ‘The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (4), 640-653.
53. Vining, A.R. and D.L. Weimer (2010), ‘Foundations of public administra-tion: policy analysis’, Public Administration Review, Foundations of Public Administration Series, retrieved from http://www.aspanet.org/public/ASPADocs/PAR/FPA/FPA-Policy-Article.pdf (accessed 20 January 2014).
54. Voss, J-P. and A. Simons (2014), ‘Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation’, Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 735-754.
55. Weale, A. (2001), ‘Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy’, Science and Public Policy, 28, 413-421.
56. Weaver, R.K. and B. Rockman (1993), Do Institutions Matter?, Washington: The Brooking Institute.
57. Weiss, C. (1979), ‘The many meanings of research utilization’, Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431.
58. Wildavsky, A. (1979), Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston: Little, Brown.
59. Wurzel, R.K.W., A.R. Zito and A.J. Jordan (2013), Environmental Governance in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of New Environmental Policy Instruments, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.