A novel interactive health communication application (IHCA) for parents of children with long-term conditions: Development, implementation and feasibility assessment

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-46

  Swallow, Veronica ^a   Carolan, Ian ^a,b   Smith, Trish ^a,b   Webb, Nicholas J A ^b   Knafl, Kathleen ^c   Santacroce, Sheila ^c   Campbell, Malcolm ^a   Harper Jones, Melanie ^a   Hanif, Noreen ^b   Hall, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL MANCHESTER CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Application; Children and young people; Kidney; Long term; Mixed methods; Parents

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAUCASIAN; CHILD; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFANT; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PARENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHRONIC DISEASE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERNET; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PARENTS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATE MEDICINE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84958773537     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2014.948174     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Warady B, Chadha V. Chronic kidney disease in children: the global perspective. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:1999-2009.
2. DOH. The National Service Framework for renal services: working for children and young people. London: Department of Health; 2006.
3. Goldstein S. Quality of life in children with CKD: research expanding, but more solely needed. Nephrol Times 2009;2(7)15-17. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000358532. 86314.54.
4. Griffin S, MacGregor M. Facing an epidemic of chronic kidney disease. Clin Med 2005;5:521-5.
5. Lewis M. Demography of renal disease in childhood. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 13:118-24.
6. Stoop AP, van't Riet A, Berg M. Using information technology for patient education: realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Counsel 2004;54:187-95.
7. Van't Riet A, Berg M, Hiddens F, Sol K. Meeting patients' needs with patient information systems: potential benefits of new technologies. Intern J Med Inform 2001;64:1-14.
8. Darzi. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Norwich: The Stationery Office; 2008.
9. Whyte KL, Hunter I. Internet access, utilisation and perception by parents. Arch Dis Child 2008;93:448-b-9.
10. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ 2007;335:24-7.
11. Fox MP. A systematic review of the literature reporting on studies that examined the impact of interactive, computer-based patient education programs. Patient Educ Couns, 2009;77(1):6-13.
12. Murray E, Burns J, See T, et al. Computer-based programmes ('Interactive Health Communication Applications') for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2009.
13. Clarke CL, Reed J, Wainwright D, et al. The discipline of improvement: something old, something new? J Nurs Manage 2004;12:85-96.
14. MRC. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council; 2008.
15. ONS. Social Trends. London: Office of National Statistics; 2009.
16. Tuffrey C, Finlay F. Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:534-6.
17. Black A, Car J, Paglian C, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1000387.
18. Svensson P-G. eHealth Applications in Health Care Management. eHealth Int 2002;1:5.
19. Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:1.
20. Swallow V, Knafl K, Sanatacroce S, et al. The Online Parent Information and Support project, meeting parents' information and support needs for home-based management of childhood chronic kidney disease: research protocol. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:2095-102.
21. Swallow V, Lambert H, Clarke C, et al. Childhood chronic-kidney-disease: a longitudinal-qualitative study of families learning to share management early in the trajectory. Patient Educ Counsel 2008;73:354-62.
22. Siu KWM. Users' creative responses and designers' roles. Des Issues 2003;19: 64-73.
23. Macfadyen A, Swallow V, Santacroce S, Lambert H. Involving fathers in research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2011;16(3):216-19.
24. Higham S, Davies R. Protecting, providing, and participating: fathers' roles during their child's unplanned hospital stay, an ethnographic study. J Adv Nurs 2013;69: 1390-9.
25. Kieffer C. Citizen empowerment a developmental perspective. Prev Human Serv 1984;3:9-36.
26. Entwistle V, Refrew M, Yearley S, et al. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. Br Med J 1998;316:463-6.
27. Swallow V, Coad J, Macfadyen A. Involving children, young people and parents in knowledge generation in health and social care research. In: Nolan M, Hanson E, Grant G, Keady J, eds. User participation research in health and social care. Buckingham: OUPress; 2007:151-65.
28. Gillaspy M. Starting a Consumer Health Information Service in a Public Library. Publ Libr Q 2008;18:5-19.
29. INVOLVE. People & Participation, How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision Making. London: INVOLVE; 2005; Available from: URL http://www.invo.org.uk/(last accessed 6th Nov 2013).
30. Marsh D. Project management and PRINCE. Health Inform J 1996;2:21-7.
31. White D, Fortune J. Current practice in project management-an empirical study. Int J Proj Manage 2002;20:1-11.
32. Swallow V, Hall A, Carolan I, et al. Designing a web-application to support parents' home-based care of childhood CKD: qualitative study of family and professional requirements. BMC Nephrol 2014;15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-34.
33. Hedman AS. Using the SMOG formula to revise a health-related document. Statistical Measurement of Gobbledygook. Am J Health Educ 2008;39:61-4.
34. Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 2004; 19:440-6.
35. Hoffmann T, Ladner Y. Assessing the suitability of written stroke materials: an evaluation of the interrater reliability of the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) checklist. Top Stroke Rehabil 2012;19:417-22.
36. Doak C, Doak L, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy levels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1996.
37. Smith J, Cheater F, Bekker H. Parents' experiences of living with a child with a long-term condition: a rapid structured review of the literature. Health Expect 2013. doi: 10.1111/hex.12040.
38. Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer J, Appel R. The health on the net code of conduct for medical and health websites. Comput Biol Med 1998;28:603-10.
39. Saks M, Allsop J. Researching health: qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007.
40. Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
41. Marr S, Steele K, Swallow V, et al. Mapping the range and scope of emergency nurse practitioner services in the Northern and Yorkshire Region: a telephone survey. Emerg Med J 2003;20:414-7.
42. Lund A. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsl 2001;8(2).
43. Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs 2013;69:2423-31.
44. Swallow V, Newton J, Van Lottum C. How to manage and display qualitative data using 'Framework' and Microsoft (R) Excel. J Clin Nurs 2003;12:610-2.
45. Swallow V, Nightingale R, Williams J, et al. Multidisciplinary teams, and parents, negotiating common ground in shared-care of children with long-term conditions: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:264.
46. Swallow V, Clarke C, Iles S, Harden J. Work based lifelong learning through professional portfolios: challenge or reward? Pharm Educ 2006;6:77-89.
47. Swallow VM, Chalmers H, Miller J, et al. Accredited work-based learning (AWBL) for new nursing roles: nurses' experiences of two pilot schemes. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10:820-1.
48. Garrig I, Gomez J, Houben G-J. Specification of personalization in web application design. Inf Softw Technol 2010;52:991-1010.
49. Choudhry UK, Jandu S, Mahal J, et al. Health promotion and participatory action research with South Asian women. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002;34:75-81.