Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges

Psychophysiology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 406-409

  Macnamara, Annmarie ^a   Phan, K Luan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b JESSE BROWN VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Psychoneurometrics; Research Domain Criteria; Threat sensitivity; Units of analysis

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL DISORDERS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NEUROSCIENCE; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; LEARNING; MENTAL DISORDERS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH (U.S.); NEUROSCIENCES; RESEARCH;

EID: 84958681231     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12587     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., Arnsten, A., Buchanan, R. W., Cohen, J. D., Geyer, M., ... Heinssen, R. (2009). Selecting paradigms from cognitive neuroscience for translation into use in clinical trials: Proceedings of the third CNTRICS meeting. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 109-114. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn163
2. Bennett, C. M., & Miller, M. B. (2010). How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 133-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05446.x
3. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
4. Cuthbert, B. N. (2014a). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13, 28-35. doi: 10.1002/wps.20087
5. Cuthbert, B. N. (2014b). Translating intermediate phenotypes to psychopathology: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria. Psychophysiology, 51, 1205-1206. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12342
6. Dennett, D. (2003). Who's on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 19-30.
7. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, research version-non-patient edition (SCID-I/NP). New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
8. Garbin, C. P. (2015). Validity. Retrieved from http://psych.unl.edu/psycrs/971/scale/validity.PDF
9. Insel, T. R., & Quirion, R. (2005). Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline. JAMA, 294, 2221-2224.
10. Kappenman, E. S., Farrens, J. L., Luck, S. J., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014). Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: Poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01368
11. Kappenman, E. S., MacNamara, A., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014). Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 577-583. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu098
12. Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology, 53, 286-297.
13. Kramer, M. D., Patrick, C. J., Krueger, R. F., & Gasperi, M. (2012). Delineating physiologic defensive reactivity in the domain of self-report: Phenotypic and etiologic structure of dispositional fear. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1305-1320. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002194
14. Kujawa, A., Klein, D. N., & Proudfit, G. H. (2013). Two-year stability of the late positive potential across middle childhood and adolescence. Biological Psychology, 94, 290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.002
15. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019
16. Loevinger, J. (1954). The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 493-504. doi: 10.1037/h0058543
17. Moran, T. P., Jendrusina, A. A., & Moser, J. S. (2013). The psychometric properties of the late positive potential during emotion processing and regulation. Brain Research, 1516, 66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.04.018
18. Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012). Research Domain Criteria: Cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 29-37.
19. Moser, J. S., Durbin, C. E., Patrick, C. J., & Schmidt, N. B. (2015). Combining neural and behavioral indicators in the assessment of internalizing psychopathology in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 329-340. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.865191
20. Patrick, C. J., Durbin, C. E., & Moser, J. S. (2012). Reconceptualizing antisocial deviance in neurobehavioral terms [Special issue 3]. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1047-1071. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000533
21. Patrick, C. J., Venables, N. C., Yancey, J. R., Hicks, B. M., Nelson, L. D., & Kramer, M. D. (2013). A construct-network approach to bridging diagnostic and physiological domains: Application to assessment of externalizing psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 902-916. doi: 10.1037/a0032807
22. Riesel, A., Weinberg, A., Endrass, T., Meyer, A., & Hajcak, G. (2013). The ERN is the ERN is the ERN? Convergent validity of error-related brain activity across different tasks. Biological Psychology, 93, 377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.007
23. Sauder, C. L., Hajcak, G., Angstadt, M., & Phan, K. L. (2013). Test-retest reliability of amygdala response to emotional faces. Psychophysiology, 50, 1147-1156. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12129
24. Sharp, P. B., Miller, G. A., & Heller, W. (2015). Transdiagnostic dimensions of anxiety: Neural mechanisms, executive functions, and new directions. International Journal of Psychophysiology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.07.001
25. Vrieze, E., Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Hermans, D., Pizzagalli, D. A., Sienaert, P., ... Claes, S. (2014). Dimensions in major depressive disorder and their relevance for treatment outcome. Journal of Affective Disorders, 155, 35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.020
26. Yancey, J. R., Venables, N. C., & Patrick, C. J. (2016). Psychoneurometric operationalization of threat sensitivity: Relations with clinical symptom and physiological response criteria. Psychophysiology, 53, 393-405.
27. Zanto, T. P., Pa, J., & Gazzaley, A. (2014). Reliability measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging in a longitudinal evaluation of mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage, 84, 443-452. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.063