A single generation of domestication heritably alters the expression of hundreds of genes

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Christie, Mark R ^a,b,c   Marine, Melanie L ^c   Fox, Samuel E ^c,d   French, Rod A ^e   Blouin, Michael S ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMESTICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HERITABILITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; SALMONID;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTICATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC CROSS; GENETIC DRIFT; HERITABILITY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; MALE; METABOLISM; MOTHER; NONHUMAN; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; PROGENY; REARING; WILD TYPE; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PEDIGREE;

ANIMALIA; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; SALMONIDAE;

FISH PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FISH PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; PEDIGREE;

EID: 84958581852     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10676     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, 1872).
2. Diamond, J. Guns, Germs, Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (Norton, 1999).
3. Diamond, J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700-707 (2002).
4. Axelsson, E. et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495, 360-364 (2013).
5. Carneiro, M. et al. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science 345, 1074-1079 (2014).
6. Rubin, C. J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464, 587-591 (2010).
7. Montague, M. J. et al. Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17230-17235 (2014).
8. Mäkinen, H., Vasemägi, A., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Primmer, C. R. Population genomic analyses of early-phase Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) domestication/captive breeding. Evol. Appl. 8, 93-107 (2014).
9. Haldane, J. B. S. The cost of natural selection. J. Genet. 55, 511-524 (1957).
10. Nunney, L. The cost of natural selection revisited. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40, 185-194 (2003).
11. Araki, H., Ardren, W. R., Olsen, E., Cooper, B., Blouin, M. S. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv. Biol. 21, 181-190 (2007).
12. McDonagh, M. B. et al. Meat quality and the calpain system of feedlot steers following a single generation of divergent selection for residual feed intake. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 41, 1013-1021 (2001).
13. Frankham, R. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol. Ecol. 17, 325-333 (2008).
14. Roberge, C., Normandeau, E., Einum, S., Guderley, H., Bernatchez, L. Genetic consequences of interbreeding between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: insights from the transcriptome. Mol. Ecol. 17, 314-324 (2008).
15. Christie, M. R., Ford, M. J., Blouin, M. S. On the reproductive success of earlygeneration hatchery fish in the wild. Evol. Appl. 7, 883-896 (2014).
16. Christie, M. R., Marine, M. L., French, R. A., Blouin, M. S. Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 238-242 (2012).
17. Tobler, R. et al. Massive habitat-specific genomic response in D. melanogaster populations during experimental evolution in hot and cold environments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 364-375 (2014).
18. Wittkopp, P. J., Kalay, G. Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 59-69 (2012).
19. Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Pigliucci, M. What role does heritable epigenetic variation play in phenotypic evolution? BioScience 60, 232-237 (2010).
20. Araki, H., Cooper, B., Blouin, M. S. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318, 100-103 (2007).
21. Mousseau, T. A., Fox, C. W. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 13, 403-407 (1998).
22. Wolf, J. B., Wade, M. J. What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B. Biol. Sci. 364, 1107-1115 (2009).
23. Hedgecock, D. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of growth heterosis in larval Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2313-2318 (2007).
24. Berthelot, C. et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 5, 3657-3657 (2014).
25. Waples, R. S. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89, 438-450 (1998).
26. Latremouille, D. N. Fin erosion in aquaculture and natural environments. Rev. Fish. Sci. 11, 315-335 (2003).
27. Riley, S. C., Tatara, C. P., Scheurer, J. A. Aggression and feeding of hatcheryreared and naturally reared steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry in a laboratory flume and a comparison with observations in natural streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 1400-1409 (2005).
28. Tatara, C. P., Riley, S. C., Scheurer, J. A. Environmental enrichment in steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatcheries: field evaluation of aggression, foraging, territoriality in natural and hatchery fry. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 744-753 (2008).
29. Allendorf, F. W. Delay of adaptation to captive breeding by equalizing family-size. Conserv. Biol. 7, 416-419 (1993).
30. Thompson, N. F., Blouin., M. S. The effects of high rearing density on the potential for domestication selection in hatchery culture of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 72, 1829-1834 (2015).
31. Teletchea, F., Fontaine, P. Levels of domestication in fish: implications for the sustainable future of aquaculture. Fish Fish. 15, 181-195 (2014).
32. US Department of CommerceGood, T. P., Waples, R. S., Adams, P. Updated status of federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead (US Department of Commerce NOAA Tech MemoNMFS-NWFSC-66 598, 2005; Available at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Publications/Biological-Status-Reviews/Salmon.cfm(accessed on 28 November 2014).
33. Araki, H., Berejikian, B. A., Ford, M. J., Blouin, M. S. Fitness of hatcheryreared salmonids in the wild. Evol. Appl. 1, 342-355 (2008).
34. Brunelli, J. P., Wertzler, K. J., Sundin, K., Thorgaard, G. H. Y-specific sequences and polymorphisms in rainbow trout and Chinook salmon. Genome 51, 739-748 (2008).
35. Reebs, S. G. Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 12, 349-371 (2002).
36. Fox, S., Filichkin, S., Mockler, T. in Plant Systems Biology. (ed. Belostotsky, D. A. 553 chap. 5 79-108 (Humana Press, 2009).
37. Langmead, B., Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
38. Fox, S. E. et al. Sequencing and characterization of the anadromous steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) transcriptome. Mar. Genome 15, 13-15 (2014).
39. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 26, 139-140 (2010).
40. McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y., Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288-4297 (2012).
41. Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674-3676 (2005).
42. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009).