Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 238-242

  Christie, Mark R ^a   Marine, Melanie L ^a   French, Rod A ^b   Blouin, Michael S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fisheries; Genetics; Parentage; Rapid evolution; Salmon

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CAPTIVE BREEDING; DOMESTICATION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FEMALE; FISH GENETICS; GENETIC TRAIT; HATCHERY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEA; SMOLT; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; FISHES; MALE; PEDIGREE; REPRODUCTION;

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS;

EID: 84855989869     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111073109     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hedrick P (2005) Genetics of Populations (Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, UK).
2. Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the Genetics of Populations (Blackwell, Oxford), pp 452-481.
3. Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol 21:303-312. (Pubitemid 46474737)
4. Fraser DJ (2008) How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol Appl 1:535-586.
5. Snyder NFR, et al. (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv Biol 10:338-348.
6. Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100-103. (Pubitemid 47538041)
7. Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17:325-333.
8. Williamson KS, Murdoch AR, Pearsons TN, Ward EJ, Ford MJ (2010) Factors influencing the relative fitness of hatchery and wild spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Wenatchee River, Washington, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:1840-1851.
9. Lynch M, O'Hely M (2001) Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv Genet 2:363-378. (Pubitemid 33635447)
10. Araki H, Berejikian BA, Ford MJ, Blouin MS (2008) Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evol Appl 1:342-355.
11. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783-796.
12. Hansen MM, Mensberg KLD (2009) Admixture analysis of stocked brown trout populations using mapped microsatellite DNA markers: Indigenous trout persist in introgressed populations. Biol Lett 5:656-659.
13. Pelletier F, Réale D, Watters J, Boakes EH, Garant D (2009) Value of captive populations for quantitative genetics research. Trends Ecol Evol 24:263-270.
14. Neff BD, Garner SR, Heath JW, Heath DD (2008) The MHC and non-random mating in a captive population of Chinook salmon. Heredity 101:175-185.
15. Bernatchez L, Landry C (2003) MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: What have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J Evol Biol 16:363-377. (Pubitemid 36567968)
16. Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Biol 16:815-825.
17. Kostow K (2009) Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steel-head hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19:9-31.
18. Naish KA, et al. (2007) An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv Mar Biol 53:61-194. (Pubitemid 47525521)
19. Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N; GeM Working Group (2010) Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol Evol 25:520-529.
20. Good TP, Waples RS, Adams P eds. (2005) Updated status of federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead. US Department of Commerce NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-66, 598 p. Available at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ Publications/Biological-Status-Reviews/Salmon.cfm. Accessed November 28, 2011.
21. Thrower FP, Hard JJ (2008) Effects of a single event of close inbreeding on growth and survival in steelhead. Conserv Genet 10:1299-1307.
22. Reisenbichler R, Rubin S, Wetzel L, Phelps S (2004) Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching, eds Leber KM, Kitada S, Blakenship HL, Svasand T (Blackwell, Oxford), pp 371-384.
23. Heath DD, Heath JW, Bryden CA, Johnson RM, Fox CW (2003) Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science 299:1738-1740. (Pubitemid 36337201)
24. Roberge C, Normandeau E, Einum S, Guderley H, Bernatchez L (2008) Genetic consequences of interbreeding between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: Insights from the transcriptome. Mol Ecol 17:314-324. (Pubitemid 350292462)
25. Frankham R, Lobel DA (1992) Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biol 11:333-342.
26. Quinn TP (2005) The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout (University of Washington Press, Seattle).
27. Araki H, Ardren WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild:Evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood river. Conserv Biol 21:181-190.
28. Christie MR, Marine ML, Blouin MS (2011) Who are the missing parents? Grand-parentage analysis identifies multiple sources of gene flow into a wild population. Mol Ecol 20:1263-1276.
29. Olsen EA (2003) Hood River and Pelton ladder evaluation studies. Annual Report 2000-01 of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, OR).
30. Kostow KE (2004) Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:577-589.
31. Seamons TR, Dauer MB, Sneva J, Quinn TP (2009) Use of parentage assignment and DNA genotyping to validate scale analysis for estimating steelhead age and spawning history. N Am J Fish Manage 29:396-403.
32. Christie MR (2010) Parentage in natural populations: Novel methods to detect parentoffspring pairs in large data sets. Mol Ecol Resour 10:115-128.
33. R Development Core Team(2010)ALanguage and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). Available at http://www.R-project.org. Accessed December 11, 2010.
34. Pearse DE, et al. (2009) Over the falls? Rapid evolution of ecotypic differentiation in steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Hered 100:515-525.
35. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
36. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099-1106.
37. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, New York).
38. Sokal RR, Rohlf J (1995) Biometry (Freeman, New York), pp 685-715.