Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: An illustrative case study

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Heaton, Janet ^a   Day, Jo ^a   Britten, Nicky ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Co production; Collaborative health research; Knowledge translation

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MASS COMMUNICATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; STROKE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; STROKE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84958291823     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Walshe K, Davies HTO. Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilisation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(Suppl3):1-12.
2. Treasury HM. A review of UK health research funding: Sir David Cooksey. London: HM Treasury; 2006.
3. Department of Health (DH). Report of the high level group on clinical effectiveness, chaired by Professor Sir John Tooke. London: DH; 2007.
4. Baker R, Robertson N, Rogers S, Davies M, Brunskill N, Khunti K, et al. The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland (LNR): a programme protocol. Implement Sci. 2009;4:72 (5 pages).
5. Nicholson D. Innovation, health and wealth: accelerating adoption and diffusion in the NHS. London: Department of Health; 2011.
6. Currie G, Lockett A, Enany NE. From what we know to what we do: lessons learned from the translational CLAHRC initiative in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(Suppl3):27-39.
7. D'Andreta D, Scarbrough H, Evans S. The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care initiative within the English National Health Service. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(Suppl3):40-52.
8. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton CR, Harvey G, McCormack B, Graham I. Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(Suppl3):13-26.
9. Soper B, Yaqub O, Hinrichs S, Marjanovich S, Drabble S, Hanney S. CLAHRCs in practice: combined knowledge transfer and exchange strategies, cultural change, and experimentation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(Suppl3):53-64.
10. Martin GP, Ward V, Hendy J, Rowley E, Nancarrow S, Heaton J, et al. The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: the case of NIHR CLAHRCs. Evid Policy. 2011;6(4):489-509.
11. PenCLAHRC website: http://clahrc-peninsula.nihr.ac.uk/ Accessed 26 August 2015.
12. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997/2008.
13. Heaton J, Day J, Britten, N. Inside the 'black box' of a knowledge translation program in applied health research. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(11):1477-91.
14. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 1996;24(6):1073-87.
15. Needham C, Carr S. Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Research briefing 31. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE); 2009.
16. Boyle D, Coote A, Sherwood C, Slay J. Right here, right now: taking co-production into the mainstream. Discussion paper. London: Nesta; 2010.
17. Boyle D, Harris M. The challenge of co-production: how equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. Discussion Paper. London: Nesta; 2009.
18. Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). Co-production in social care: what it is and how to do it. Adults' Services Guide 51. London: SCIE; 2013.
19. Pettigrew AM. Co-producing knowledge and the challenges of international collaborative research. In: Pettigrew AM, Whittington R, Melin L, Sánchez-Runde C, van den Bosch F, Ruigrok W, editors. Innovative Forms of Organizing: international perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 352-75.
20. Martin S. Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money Manage. 2010;30(4):211-8.
21. Nutley S. Debate: are we all co-producers of research now? Public Money Manage. 2010;30(5):263-5.
22. Hewison A, Gale N, Shapiro J. Co-production in research: some reflections on the experience of engaging practitioners in health research. Public Money Manage. 2012;32(4):297-302.
23. Monks T, Pitt M, Stein K, James M. Maximising the population benefit from thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: a modeling study of in-hospital delays. Stroke. 2012;43:2706-11.
24. Novak JD, Cañas AJ. Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Educ. 2007;3(1):29-42.
25. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Sage; 1994. p. 173-94.
26. Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31:802-21.
27. Pearson M, Monks T, Gibson A, Allen M, Komashieb A, Fordyce A, et al. Involving patients and the public in healthcare operational research-the challenges and opportunities. Oper Res for Health Care. 2013;2(4):86-9.