How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 207-214

  Harris, J ^a   Croot, L ^a   Thompson, J ^b   Springett, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH WORKER; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH WORK; STAKEHOLDER;

EMPIRICISM; HUMAN; PEER GROUP; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; LITERATURE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HUMANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84958171672     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-205701     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Braye S, Preston-Shoot M. Emerging from out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviews. Evid Policy 2005;1:173-94.
2. Kreis J, Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, et al. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. Health Expect 2013;16:323-37.
3. Farrell C. Patient and public involvement in health: the evidence for policy implementation: a summary of the results of the Health in Partnership research programme. Department of Health, 2004.
4. Health and Social Care Act. 2001.
5. Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18:1151-66.
6. Fudge N, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ 2008;336:313-17.
7. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med 2005;60:2575-84.
8. Faulkner A, Thomas P. User-led research and evidence-based medicine. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:1-3.
9. Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR, et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect 2009;12:209-20.
10. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 2014;17:637-50.
11. Hicks S, Duran B, Wallerstein N, et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2012;6:289-99.
12. Anderson LM, Oliver SR, Michie S, et al. Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1223-9.
13. Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Noyes J, et al. Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1230-43.
14. Bunn F, Sworn K, Brayne C, et al. Contextualizing the findings of a systematic review on patient and carer experiences of dementia diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2015;18:740-53.
15. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(Suppl 1):21-34.
16. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. Sage, 1997.
17. Astbury B, Leeuw FL. Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. Am J Eval 2010;31:363-81.
18. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med 2013;11:21.
19. Leeman J, Chang YK, Lee EJ, et al. Implementation of antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: a realist synthesis of evidence. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:1915-30.
20. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:12.
21. Greenhalgh T, Kristjansson E, Robinson V. Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes. BMJ 2007;335:858-61.
22. Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay AC, et al. Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implement Sci 2011;6:24.
23. Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, et al. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q 2012;90:421-56.
24. Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:33.
25. Hardwick R, Pearson M, Byng R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care: protocol for a realist review. Syst Rev 2013;2:12.
26. Liu JJ, Davidson E, Bhopal RS, et al. Adapting health promotion interventions to meet the needs of ethnic minority groups: mixed-methods evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1-469.
27. Harris J, Springett J, Croot L, et al. Can community-based peer support promote health literacy and reduce inequalities? A realist review. Pub Health Research 2015;3.
28. Booth A, Harris J, Croot E, et al. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER). BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:118.
29. Springett J, Wright MT, Roche B. Developing quality criteria for Participatory Health Research: an agenda for action. WZB Discussion Paper, 2011.
30. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:325-50.
31. Dennis C-L. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2003;40:321-32.
32. Gillis DE. Exploring dimensions of health literacy: a case study of interventions to promote and support breastfeeding. University of Nottingham, 2009.
33. Springett J, Owens C, Callaghan J. The challenge of combining 'lay' knowledge with 'evidence-based' practice in health promotion: fag Ends Smoking Cessation Service. Crit Public Health 2007;17:243-56.
34. Abbott PA, Davison JE, Moore LF, et al. Effective nutrition education for Aboriginal Australians: lessons from a diabetes cooking course. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44:55-9.
35. Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, et al. Women's perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis. Birth 2011;38:49-60.
36. Begh RA, Aveyard P, Upton P, et al. Promoting smoking cessation in Pakistani and Bangladeshi men in the UK: pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of trained community outreach workers. Trials 2011;12:197.
37. O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid G, et al. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Public Health Res 2013;1.
38. Curtis P, Woodhill R, Stapleton H. The peer-professional interface in a community-based, breast feeding peer-support project. Midwifery 2007; 23:146-56.
39. Dykes F. Government funded breastfeeding peer support projects: implications for practice. Matern Child Nutr 2005;1:21-31.
40. Vassilev I, Rogers A, Sanders C, et al. Social networks, social capital and chronic illness self-management: a realist review. Chronic Illn 2011;7:60-86.
41. Ledwith M, Springett J. Participatory practice. Bristol: Participatory Practice The Policy Press, 2010:13-34.
42. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Pub Health 2010;100(Suppl 1):S40-6.
43. Jasanoff S. Breaking the waves in science studies: comment on HM Collins and Robert Evans, 'the third wave of science studies'. Soc Stud Sci 2003;33:389-400.
44. Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, 1992.
45. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press, 1991.
46. McClean S, Shaw A. From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge-an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 2005;15:729-49.
47. Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociol Health Illn 2003;25:41-57.
48. Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:759-68.
49. Bowen S, Graham ID. Integrated knowledge translation. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, eds. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Wiley, 2013:14-23.
50. Coulter A, Roberts S, Dixon A. Delivering better services for people with long-term conditions: building the house of care. The Kings Fund, 2013.
51. Haywood BK, Besley JC. Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Underst Sci 2014;23:92-106.
52. Kreindler SA. Patient involvement and the politics of methodology. Can Public Adm 2009;52:113-24.
53. van Bekkum JE, Hilton S. UK research funding bodies' views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:318.
54. Popay J. Community empowerment and health improvement: the English experience. In: Morgan A, Davies M, Ziglio E, eds. Health assets in a global context: theory, methods, action. Springer, 2010:183-95.
55. Turner G, Shepherd J. A method in search of a theory: peer education and health promotion. Health Educ Res 1999;14:235-47.
56. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012;12:80.