Heating up the measurement debate: What psychologists can learn from the history of physics

Theory and Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 27-43

  Bringmann, Laura F ^a   Eronen, Markus I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

measurement; physics; psychology; temperature; theory; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957796558     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354315617253     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. M.K.Barnett (1956). The development of thermometry and the temperature concept. Osiris, 12, 269–341.
3. W.C.Bechtel (2008). Mental mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge.
4. W.BechtelR.C.Richardson (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. D.Borsboom (2005). Measuring the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. D.BorsboomA.O.J.CramerR.A.KievitA.Z.ScholtenS.Franić (2009). The end of construct validity. In (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–172). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
7. D.BorsboomG.J.MellenberghJ.van Heerden (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.
8. D.T.CampbellD.W.Fiske (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
9. H.Chang (1995). Circularity and reliability in measurement. Perspectives on Science, 3, 153–172.
10. H.Chang (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. B.Choppin (1985). Lessons for psychometrics from thermometry. Evaluation in Education, 9, 9–12.
12. M.Clapham (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828–841.
13. J.S.Coleman (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York, NY: Free Press.
14. N.Cowan (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
15. L.J.CronbachP.E.Meehl (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281.
16. S.Culp (1994). Defending robustness: The bacterial mesosome as a test case. PSA 1994: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 46–57.
17. A.L.DuckworthM.L.Kern (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268.
18. S.Embretson (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.
19. S.Embretson (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 380–396.
20. S.EmbretsonJ.Gorin (2001). Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 343–368.
21. S.Embretson (2004). The second century of ability testing: Some predictions and speculations. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 1–32.
22. M.I.Eronen (2012). Pluralistic physicalism and the causal exclusion argument. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2, 219–232.
23. A.FrigerioA.GiordaniL.Mari (2010). Outline of a general model of measurement. Synthese, 175, 123–149.
24. V.GalleseM.RochatG.CossuC.Sinigaglia (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology, 45, 103–113.
25. G.Gigerenzer (1987). Probabilistic thinking and the fight against subjectivity. In (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution: Vol. 2. Ideas in the sciences (pp. 11–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. I.Hacking (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. S.B.Hood (2009). Validity in psychological testing and scientific realism. Theory & Psychology, 19, 451–473.
28. A.M.HubleyS.M.ZhuA.SasakiA.M.Gadermann (2013). Synthesis of validation practices in two assessment journals: Psychological Assessment and the European Journal of Psychological Assessment. In (Eds.), Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences (pp. 193–213). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
29. S.M.Humphry (2011). The role of the unit in physics and psychometrics. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9, 1–24.
30. S.M.Humphry (2013). Understanding measurement in light of its origins. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00113
31. J.JonidesR.L.LewisD.E.NeeC.A.LustigM.G.BermanK.S.Moore (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193.
32. M.T.Kane (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 319–342.
33. M.T.Kane (2006). Validation. In (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
34. M.T.Kane (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73.
35. P.Kline (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London, UK: Routledge.
36. H.Kyburg (1984). Theory and measurement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. H.Kyburg (1992). Measuring errors of measurement. In (Eds.), Philosophical and foundational issues in measurement theory (pp. 75–91). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. A.Kyngdon (2013). Descriptive theories of behaviour may allow for the scientific measurement of psychological attributes. Theory & Psychology, 23, 227–250.
39. R.W.Lissitz (Ed.). (2009). The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
40. K.MarkusD.Borsboom (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation and meaning. London, UK: Routledge.
41. R.P.McDonald (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. S.Messick (1989). Validity. In (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education and National Council on Measurement in Education.
43. J.Michell (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.
44. J.Michell (1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. J.Michell (2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. Theory & Psychology, 10, 639–667.
46. J.Michell (2004). Item response models, pathological science and the shape of error: Reply to Borsboom and Mellenbergh. Theory & Psychology, 14, 121–129.
47. J.Michell (2013). Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 13–21.
48. R.J.MislevyL.S.SteinbergR.G.Almond (2002). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–67.
49. H.Nederbragt (2012). Multiple derivability and the reliability and stabilization of theories. In (Eds.), Characterizing the robustness of science: After the practice turn in the philosophy of science (pp. 121–145). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
50. P.E.NewtonS.D.Shaw (2013). Validity in educational & psychological assessment. London, UK: Sage.
51. T.J.Quinn (1990). Monographs in physical measurement: Temperature. London, UK: Academic Press.
52. G.Rasch (1980). Some probabilistic models for intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. D.Sherry (2011). Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42, 509–524.
54. K.Sijtsma (2012). Psychological measurement between physics and statistics. Theory & Psychology, 22, 786–809.
55. S.Spaulding (2013). Mirror neurons and social cognition. Mind & Language, 28, 233–257.
56. J.Stegenga (2012). Rerum concordia discors: Robustness and discordant multimodal evidence. In (Eds.), Characterizing the robustness of science: After the practice turn in the philosophy of science (pp. 207–226). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
57. W.StroebeF.Sack (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71.
58. E.Tal (2011). How accurate is the standard second?Philosophy of Science, 78, 1082–1096.
59. E.Tal (2013). Old and new problems in philosophy of measurement. Philosophy Compass, 8, 1159–1173.
60. K.K.Tatsuoka (1987). Validation of cognitive sensitivity for item response curves. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 233–245.
61. K.K.Tatsuoka (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. In (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 453–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. G.Trendler (2009). Measurement theory, psychology and the revolution that cannot happen. Theory & Psychology, 19, 579–599.
63. J.D.Trout (1998). Measuring the intentional world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64. H.L.van der MaasC.V.DolanR.P.GrasmanJ.M.WichertsH.M.HuizengaM.E.Raijmakers (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.
65. W.C.Wimsatt (1981). Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 124–163). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
66. W.C.Wimsatt (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
67. J.Woodward (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.