A viability model for digital cities: Economic and acceptability factors

Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 79-96

  Anthopoulos, Leonidas G ^a   Tougountzoglou, Theologis E ^a  

^a Technological Education Institute TEI of Larissa   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957726353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Anthopoulos, L. (2005). Collaborating environments in e-government. PhD Thesis. Retrieved from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki-Psifiothiki. (GRI-2005-690).
2. th International Conference on Intelligent Environments- IE'10, Malaysia. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5673950
3. Anthopoulos, L. & Tsoukalas, I. (2006). The Implementation Model of a Digital City: The Case Study of the Digital City of Trikala, Greece. Journal of E-Government, 2(2), 91-109.
4. Anthopoulos, L., Gerogiannis, V. & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Enterprise Architecture for e-Strategy Standardization and Management: Lessons Learnt from Greece. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), Volume 1, Issue 4, December 2010.
5. Ban Ki-Moon, (2009). Better, More Equitable Urban Planning is Essential (On World's Habitat Day). Vienna: UN Information Service.
6. Björn, N. (2011). Iceberg ahead: On electronic government research and societal aging. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 310-319.
7. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe. Series Research Memoranda 0048. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
8. Centre of Regional Science (SRF). (2007). Smart cities-Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Final Report. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science.
9. Daniel, E. M., & White, A. (2005). The future of inter-organisational system linkages: Findings of an international Delphi study. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 188-203.
10. Dias, A. Jr. & Ioannou, G. Ph. (1996). Company and project evaluation model for privately promoted infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(1), 71-82.
11. European Commission. (2010). Digital Agenda for Europe: Communication from the Commission. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM: 2010:0245:FIN:EL:PDF
12. Federal Transit Administration. (2007). Construction Project Management Handbook. New York: FTA's Office of Technology. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://www.fta.dot.gov/ documents/Construct_Proj_Mangmnt_CD.pdf
13. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gartner Research. (2009). Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. Stamford: Gartner Inc. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://bhc3.com/tag/gartner/
15. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E. & Pichler-Milanovic, N. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Retrieved, December, 2011 from: http:// www.smartcities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
16. Gupta, M. C. & Narasimham, S. V. (1998). Discussion of 'CSFs in competitive tendering and negotiation model for BOT projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(5), 430.
17. IBM. (2009). How Smart is your city? Helping cities measure progress. New York: IBM Global Business Services.
18. Ishida, T., & Isbister, K. (2000). Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives. Germany: Springer.
19. Ishida, T., Aurigi, A., & Yasuoka, M. (2005). World Digital Cities: Beyond Heterogeneity. In P Van den Besselaar & S. Koizumi (eds), Digital Cities 3: Information.technologies for social capital (pp.271-314). Germany: Springer.
20. Ishida, T., Aurigi, A., & Yasuoka, M. (2009). The Advancement of World Digital Cities. In Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H., & Augusto, J.C. (eds.), Handbook on Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments (pp.23). New York: Springer.
21. Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces (1st eds.). London: Routledge.
22. Levy, S. M. (1996). Build, operate, and transfer: Paving the way for tomorrow's infrastructure. New York: Wiley.
23. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for e-Participation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16-30.
24. McKinsey Global Institute. (2009). Preparing for China's urban billion. Shanghai: McKinsey & Company.
25. Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT Professional, 9(4), 34-41.
26. Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J. & Morris, R. (2011). Smarter Cities and Their Innovation Challenges. Computer, 44(6), 32-39.
27. New Millennium Research Council. (2005). Not In The Public Interest-The Myth of Municipal Wi-Fi Networks. Washington: New Millennium Research Council.
28. O'Reilly, T., & Battelle, J. (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Retrieved, January, 2012 from: http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf
29. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2008, June). Policy Guidance for Digital Content. Paper presented at the OECD Ministerial Meeting on the future of Internet Economy, Seoul. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/ 54/40895797.pdf
30. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011 June). The Internet Economy: Generating Innovation and Growth. Paper presented at the OECD High Level Meeting, Paris. Retrieved, Sept. 2011 from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/21/48289796.pdf
31. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? Retrieved from Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) website: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/ pub.cfm?id=1565
32. Ozdoganm, I. D. & Birgonul, M. T. (2000). A decision support framework for project sponsors in the planning stage of build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 18, 343-353.
33. PMI. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: Pmbok Guide (4th ed). Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute Inc.
34. Ranasinghe, M. (1999). Private sector participation in infrastructure projects: A methodology to analyze viability of BOT, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 17, 613-623.
35. Reddick, G. C. (2011). Citizen Interaction and e-government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative and participatory models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 167-184.
36. Salman, A. F. M., Skibniewski, M. J. & Basha, I. (2007). BOT viability model for large-scale infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(1), 50-63.
37. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, M., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, M. (2011). Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation, In J. Domingue et al. (Eds.), Future Internet: Achievements and Promises (pp.431-446), Heidelberg: Springer.
38. Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763-774.
39. Tiong, R. L. K. (1990). Comparative study of BOT projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 6(1), 107-122.
40. Tiong, R. L. K. (1995a). Competitive advantage of equity of BOT tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(3), 282-289.
41. Tiong, R. L. K. (1995b). Impact of financial package versus technical solution in BOT tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(3), 304-311.
42. Tiong, R. L. K. (1996). CSFs in competitive tendering and negotiation model for BOT projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(3), 202-211.
43. U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2010). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision. New York: United Nations.
44. UNIDO. (1996). Guidelines for infrastructure development through build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects. Vienna: UNIDO.
45. Van Bastelaer, B., & Lobet-Maris, C. (Eds). (1999). Social Learning regarding Multimedia Developments at a Local Level: The Case of Digital Cities. Namur: CITA-University of Namur.
46. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Brundtland, Gro Harlem et al.