The implementation model of a digital city. The case study of the Digital City of Trikala, Greece: e-Trikala

Journal of E-Government

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 91-109

  Anthopoulos, Leo ^a   Tsoukalas, Ioannis A ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Digital City; E Governmen; Municipal environment; Participatory design; Public services; Virtual organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746538298     PISSN: 15424049     EISSN: 15424057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J399v02n02_06     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Accenture (2005). Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences. In The Government Executive Series, Accenture, April 2005. Retrieved April, 2005 from www.accenture.com
2. American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) (2005). Number of e-GOV sites measuring satisfaction surges, satisfaction growth stalls. In e-Government Satisfaction Index (2005). Retrieved March, 2005 from www.acsi.org
3. Anthopoulos, L. (2005). e-Trikala: The FirstDigital City in Greece. Government Technology. Retrieved March, 2005 from http://www.govtech.net/ news/news.php?id=93395.
4. Anthopoulos, L., & Tsoukalas, I. (2005). A Cross Border Collaboration Environment, as a means for offering online public services and for evaluating the performance of Public Executives. In the proceedings of the International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE-05), Hong Kong, China, 29/3-1/4, 2005. IEEE.
5. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young web survey (2003). Online availability of public services. How is Europe progressing? Information Society DG, 2003.
6. China Strategy Ltd (2001). Digital Beijing. Retrieved May, 2005 from www.strategy4china.com
7. Civil, S. D. (2001). e-Government: Doing What We've Never Been Able to Do Before. Civil Service Department, Singapore, 2001.
8. Einmann, E., & Paradiso M. (2004). When space shrinks - digital communities and ubiquitous society: Digital cities and urban life: A framework for international benchmarking. In the Proceedings of the Winter International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies (WISICT '04). ACM.
9. eGov Consortium (2002). IST Project 2000-28471. An Integrated Platform for Realizing One-Stop Government. D121-Services and process models functional specifications, 2002. Retrieved February, 2005 from http://www.egovproject.org
10. European Commission (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. European Commission - COM 263, 2002. Retrieved May, 2005 from http://europa.eu.int/eeurope
11. Federal CIO Council - FEA Working Group (2002). E-Gov Enterprise Architecture Guidance (Common Reference model). July 25, 2002. Retrieved February, 2005 from http://www.gsa.gov
12. Ferguson, D., Sairamesh, J., & Feldman, S. (2004). Open Frameworks for Information Cities. Communications of the ACM February 2004, vol. 47, No. 2.
13. German Federal Government (2003). BundOnline 2005. 2003 Implementation Plan. Retrieved February, 2005 from http://www.bunde.de
14. Godart, C., Saliou, H., & Bignon, J.C. (2001). Asynchronous Coordination of Virtual Teams in Creative Applications (co-design or co-engineering): Requirements and Design Criteria. In the Proceedings of the Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises (ITVE 2001) Workshop (p. 135-142). IEEE.
15. Government of Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat (2001). Canada's Report on Portals, August 10, 2001. Retrieved April, 2005 from www.canada.gc.ca
16. Horrigan, J. (2004). How Americans Get in Touch With Government. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2004. Retrieved May, 2004 from http://www.pewintemet.org
17. Ishida, T. (2002). Digital City Kyoto. Communications of the ACM, July 2002, vol.45, No. 7.
18. Ishida, T., Aurigiri, A., & Yasuoka, M. (2001). World Digital Cities: Beyond Heterogeneity. Retrieved April, 2005 from http://www.kid.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp
19. Lieshout, V. (2001). Configuring the digital city of Amsterdam. New Media & Technology, vol. 3(1), (p. 27-52). SAGE Publications.
20. Liqi (2001). Digital City-the 21st century's life style. CyberGIS Studio, Peking University, Institute of Remote Sensing & GIS, Peking University, Beijing, China. Retrieved April, 2005 from http://unpan1.un.org
21. New York City Economic Development Corporation (2005). Telecommunications and Economic Development in New York City: A Plan of Action. Retrieved April, 2005 from http://newyorkbiz.com/about_us/ TelecomPlanMarch2005.pdf
22. Sairamesh, J., Lee, A., & Anania, L. (2004). Information Cities. Communications of the ACM February 2004, vol. 47, No.2.
23. Sproull, L., & Patterson, J., (2004). Making Information Cities Livable. Communications of the ACM February 2004, vol. 49, No. 2.
24. U.K. Central IT Unit (2000). e-Government, a strategic framework for public services in the information age. Retrieved January, 2005 from www.uk-online.gov.uk
25. U.K. Crown (2000). e-Government Interoperability Framework (e-GIF). Retrieved January, 2005 from www.uk-online.gov.uk
26. U.S. Federal Government (2002). e-Government Strategy: Simplified Delivery of Services to Citizens. Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, US Federal Government-February 2002.
27. U.S. Federal Government (2003). Technical Approach for the eAuthentication Interim Capability. eGov Draft Version 0.0.1 11/03/03.
28. U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) (2003). Technical Approach for the eAuthentication Interim Capability. eGov Draft Version 0.0.1 11/ 03/03. Retrieved January, 2005 from www.gsa.gov
29. Vidgen, R. (2002). Constructing a web information system development methodology. InfoSystems Journal, vol. 12 (p. 247-261). Blackwell Science Ltd.
30. Wang, L., & Wu, H. (2001). A Framework of Integrating Digital City and Eco-city. School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, China. Retrieved March, 2005 from www.hku.hk/cupem/asiagis/fall03/Full_Paper/Wang_Lu.pdf
31. Widmayer, P. (1999). Building Digital Metropolis: Chicago's Future Networks. IT Professional Volume 1, Issue 4, July-Aug. 1999, (p. 40-46). IEEE.