Improving Medicaid: Three Decades of Change to Better Serve Women of Childbearing Age

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 336-354

  Johnson, Kay ^a   Applegate, Mary ^b   Gee, Rebekah E ^c  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Ohio Department of Education   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

maternity care; Medicaid; policy; women's health

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; HYDROXYPROGESTERONE CAPROATE; PROGESTERONE;

ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; CONSULTATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREMATURE LABOR; PRENATAL CARE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PUERPERIUM; TREATMENT INDICATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH; ADULT; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NEWBORN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PREPREGNANCY CARE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MEDICAID; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; PERINATAL CARE; PRECONCEPTION CARE; PREGNANCY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 84957691700     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000115     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Grogan C, Patashnik E. Between welfare medicine and mainstream entitlement: Medicaid at the political crossroads. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003;28:821-858.
2. Rosenbaum S, Hughes DC, Johnson K. Maternal and child health services for medically indigent children and pregnant women. Med Care. 1988a;26:315-332.
3. Currie J, Gruber J. Saving Babies: The efficacy and Cost of Recent Expansions of Medicaid Eligibility for Pregnant Women (NBER Working Paper No 4644). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Rosenbaum S. Medicaid politics and policy: 1965-2007. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34: 417-422.
5. Boonstra HD. The impact of government programs on reproductive health disparities: three case studies. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2008;11:3.
6. Johnson K, Hughes D, Rosenbaum S. Advocacy for women and children. In: Wallace HM, Ryan G, Oblesby AC eds. Maternal and Child Health Practices. Oakland, CA: Third Party Publishing Co; 1988.
7. Rosenbaum S. Medicaid expansions and access to health care. In: Rowland D, Feder J, Salganicoff A eds. Medicaid Financing Crisis: Responsibilities, Priorities, and Dollars.Washington, DC: AAAS Press;1993:45-82.
8. Howell EM, Ellwood MR. Medicaid and pregnancy: issues in expanding eligibility. Fam Plan Perspect. 1991:123-128.
9. Rosenbaum S. The enduring role of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. Health Aff. 2013a;32:2075-2081.
10. March of Dimes. Special Report to the Speaker of the House. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes.
11. Thompson FJ. Medicaid Politics: Federalism, Policy Durability, and Health Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
12. Haskins R. Work Over Welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13. Rosenbaum S. Negotiating the new health system: purchasing publicly accountable managed care. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14 (suppl):67-71.
14. Kenney G, Sommers AS, Dubay L. Moving to mandatory Medicaid managed care in Ohio: impacts on pregnant women and infants. Med Care. 2005;43:683-690.
15. Howell EM, Dubay L, Kenney G, et al. The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis. J Health Serv Res. 2004;39 (4 pt 1):825-846.
16. Sloan FA, Conover CJ, Mah ML, et al. Impact of Medicaid managed care on utilization of obstetric care: evidence from TennCare's early years. South Med J. 2002;95:811-821.
17. Rosenbaum S. Negotiating the new health system: Purchasing publicly accountable managed care Am J Prev Med. 1998;14 (3 Suppl):67-71.
18. Gold RB, Darroch JE, Frost JJ. Mainstreaming contraceptive services inmanaged care-five states' experiences. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:204-211.
19. Rosenbaum S, Shin P, Mauskopf A, et al. Beyond the freedom to choose. Medicaid, managed care, and family planning. West J Med. 1995;163 (suppl):33-38.
20. Cogan LW, Josberger RE, Gesten FC, et al. Can prenatal care impact future well-child visits? The experience of a low income population in New York State Medicaid managed care. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:92-99.
21. Roohan PJ, Butch JM, Anarella JP, et al. Quality measurement in Medicaid managed care and fee-for-service: the New York State experience. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:185-191.
22. Griffin JF, Hogan JW, Buechner JS, et al. The effect of aMedicaidmanaged care programon the adequacy of prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:497-501.
23. Danziger S, Corcoran M, Danziger S, et al. Work, income, and material hardship after welfare reform. J Consum Aff. 2000;34:6-30.
24. Salganicoff A, An J. Making the most of Medicaid: promoting the health of women and infants with preconception care. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18 (suppl):S41-S46.
25. Gold RB, Darroch JE, Frost JJ. Mainstreaming contraceptive services in managed care-five states' experiences. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:204-211.
26. Rosenbaum S. Medicaid Politics and Policy: 1965-2007. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34: 417-422.
27. Dubay L, Joyce T, Kaestner R, et al. Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women. J Health Serv Res. 2001;36:373-398.
28. Braveman P, Bennett T, Lewis C, et al. Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions. JAMA. 1993;269:1285-1289.
29. Zhang S, Cardarelli K, Shim R, et al. Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1518-1525.
30. ArimaY, GuthrieBL, RhewIC, et al. The impact of the First Steps prenatal care program on birth outcomes among women receiving Medicaid in Washington State. Health Policy. 2009;92:49-54.
31. Ray WA, Mitchel EF Jr, Piper JM. Effect of Medicaid expansions on preterm birth. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:292-297.
32. Piper JM, Mitchel EF Jr, Ray W. Presumptive eligibility for pregnant Medicaid enrollees: its effects on prenatal care and perinatal outcome. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1626-1630.
33. Griffin et al, 1991 op cit.
34. Anum EA, Retchin SM, Strauss JF III. Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19:443-451.
35. Roman LA, Meghea CI, Raffo JE, et al. Who participates in state sponsored Medicaid enhanced prenatal services? Matern Child Health J. 2010;14:110-120.
36. Long SH, Marquis MS. The effects of Florida's Medicaid eligibility expansion for pregnant women. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:371-376.
37. Baldwin LM, Larson EH, Connell FA, et al. The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1998;88: 1623-1629.
38. Gold RB, Singh S, Frost J. The Medicaid eligibility expansions for pregnant women: evaluating the strength of state implementation efforts. Fam Plan Perspect. 1993:196-207.
39. Korenbrot CC, Gill A, Clayson Z, et al. Evaluation of California's statewide implementation of enhanced perinatal services as Medicaid benefits. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:125-133.
40. Simpson L, Korenbrot C, Greene J. Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings. Public Health Rep. 1997;112:122.
41. Reichman NE, Florio MJ. The effects of enriched prenatal care services on Medicaid birth outcomes in New Jersey. J Health Econ. 1996;15: 455-476.
42. Joyce T. Impact of augmented prenatal care on birth outcomes of Medicaid recipients in New York City. J Health Econ. 1999;18:31-67.
43. Buescher PA, Roth MS, Williams D, et al. An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina.AmJPublicHealth. 1991;81:1625-1629.
44. Klerman LV, Ramey SL, Goldenberg RL, et al. Arandomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk,Medicaid-eligibleAfricanAmerican women. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:105.
45. Laditka SB, Laditka JN, Mastanduno MP, et al. Potentially avoidable maternity complications: an indicator of access to prenatal and primary care during pregnancy. J Women Health (Larchmt). 2005;41:1-26.
46. Gates A, Ranji U, Snyder L. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Coverage of preventive services for adults in Medicaid [Kaiser Family Foundation web site]. 2014. Available at: http://kff.org/report-section/coverage-ofpreventive-services-for-adults-in-medicaid-survey-findings/. Accessed November 30, 2014.
47. Lu MC, Kotelchuck M, Hogan VK, et al. Innovative strategies to reduce disparities in the quality of prenatal care in underresourced settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67 (suppl):198S-230S.
48. Markus AR. Coverage of Quality Preconception and Interconception Care for Women of Childbearing Age Enrolled in Medicaid Family Planning Waiver Programs: Key Findings From a Pilot Study. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
49. Atrash HK, Johnson K, Adams MM, et al. Preconception care for improving perinatal outcomes: the time to act. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10:3-11.
50. McCormick MC. Prenatal care-necessary but not sufficient. J Health Serv Res. 2001;36:399.
51. Schlesinger M, Kronebusch K. The failure of prenatal care policy for the poor. Health Aff (Millwood). 1990;9:91-111.
52. Guyer B. Medicaid and prenatal care: necessary but not sufficient. JAMA. 1990;264:2264-2265.
53. Lu MC, Tache V, Alexander GR, et al. Preventing low birth weight: is prenatal care the answer? J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2003;13:362-380.
54. Kozihimannil KB, Abraham JM, Virnig BA. National trends in health insurance coverage of pregnant and reproductive-age women, 2000 to 2009. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22: e135-e141.
55. Sonfield A, Gold RB. Medicaid Family Planning Expansions: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
56. Laliberté F, Lefebvre P, Law A, et al. Medicaid spending on contraceptive coverage and pregnancy-related care. Reprod Health. 2014;11:20.
57. Simon KI, Handler A. Welfare reform and insurance coverage during the pregnancy period: implications for preconception and interconception care. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18 (suppl):S97-S106.
58. Gavin NI, Adams EK, Manning WG, et al. The impact of welfare reform on insurance coverage before pregnancy and the timing of prenatal care initiation. J Health Serv Res. 2007;42: 1564-1588.
59. Rosenberg D, Handler A, Rankin KM, et al. Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference? Matern Child Health J. 2007;11:11-17.
60. Handler A, Rosenberg D, RankinKM,et al. The pre-pregnancy insurance status of public aid recipients in the aftermath of welfare reform: women in the Medicaid gap. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17:162-179.
61. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Manning WG, et al. Welfare reform, insurance coverage pre-pregnancy, and timely enrollment: an eightstate study. Inquiry. 2005;42:129-144.
62. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Handler A, et al. Transitions in insurance coverage from before pregnancy through delivery in nine states, 1996-1999. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:219-229.
63. Currie J, Grogger J. Medicaid expansions and welfare contractions: offsetting effects on prenatal care and infant health? J Health Econ. 2002;21:313-335.
64. Johnson KA, Gee RE. Managed care is here to stay: implications for obstetrics and gynecology practice. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24: 465-469.
65. Kaestner R, Dubay L, Kenney G. Managed care and infant health: an evaluation of Medicaid in the US. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1815-1833.
66. Blavin F, Kenney GM, Huntress M. The effects of express lane eligibility on Medicaid and CHIP enrollment among children. J Health Serv Res. 2014;49:1268-1289.
67. Piper JM, Mitchel EF Jr, Ray W. Presumptive eligibility for pregnant Medicaid enrollees: Its effects on prenatal care and perinatal outcome Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1626-1630.
68. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)Medicaid moving forward: improving care and transforming Medicaid delivery systems. 2012. Available at: http://www.medicaid. gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/programinformation/downloads/mmf-2013.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2014.
69. Grogan CM, Smith V. From charity care to Medicaid: governors, states, and the transformation of American health care. In: Scribnick E, ed. A More Perfect Union. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2008.
70. Kronebusch K. Medicaid and the politics of groups: recipients, providers, and policy making. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997;22:839-887.
71. Rosenbaum S. Medicaid Politics and Policy: 1965-2007. J of Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34: 417-422.
72. Jones DK, Singer PM, Ayanian JZ. The changing landscape of Medicaid: practical and political considerations for expansion. JAMA. 2014; 311:1965-1966.
73. Rosenbaum S. Medicaid's next fifty years: aligning an old program with the new normal. St Louis UJ Health L & Pol. 2013b;6:329-334.
74. Curtin SC, Osterman MJ, Uddin SF, et al. Source of payment for the delivery: births in a 33-state and District of Columbia reporting area, 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62:1-20.
75. Markus AR, Andres E, West KD, et al. Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23:e273-e280.
76. Tanne JH. Nearly half of US births were covered by Medicaid in 2010. BMJ. 2013;347:f5529.
77. Markus AR, Rosenbaum S. The role of Medicaid in promoting access to high-quality, highvalue maternity care. Womens Health Issues. 2010;20:S67-S78.
78. Osterman MJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, et al. Newly released data from the revised US birth certificate, 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62: 1-22.
79. Wilensky SE, Gray EA. Existing Medicaid beneficiaries left off the Affordable Care Act's prevention bandwagon. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32:1188-1195.
80. Johnson KA. Women's health and health reform: implications of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:492-497.
81. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:759-769.
82. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)Maternity Core Set. 2013. Available at: http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Quality-of-Care/Downloads/2013-Core-Set-of-Maternity-Measures. pdf. Accessed November 16, 2014.
83. Markus AR, Andres E, West KD, et al. Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform Womens Health Issues. 2013;23:e273-e280.
84. Applegate M, Gee RE, Martin JN Jr. Improving maternal and infant health outcomes in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:143-149.
85. Daniel-Robinson L. Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services (CMCS) Maternal and Infant Health Initiative: improving maternal and infant health outcomes in Medicaid and CHIP. 2014. Available at: http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Quality-of-Care/Downloads/Maternal-and-Infant-Health-Initiative.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2014.
86. Krans EE, Davis MM. Strong Start for mothers and newborns: implications for prenatal care delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26: 511-515.
87. Lu MC, Johnson KA. Toward a national strategy on infant mortality. Am J Public Health. 2014;104 (S1):S13-S16.
88. Secretary'sAdvisoryCommittee on InfantMortalityFinal recommendations for a national strategy to reduce infant mortality. 2012. Available at: http://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbad visory/InfantMortality/Correspondence/recom mendationsjan2013.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2014.
89. Zerzan J, Griffith K, Trudnak T, Importance of the Medicaid medical directors' multi-state collaborative for improving care in Medicaid. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes), 2014; 2(Iss 1, Article3):1-8. Available at: http://repository.academyhealth.org/cgi/view content.cgi?article=1054&context=egems. Accessed December 10, 2014.
90. Wilensky, Gray, 2013 op cit.
91. Gates et al, 2014 op cit.
92. Johnson K, Atrash H, Johnson A. Policy and finance for preconception care: opportunities for today and the future. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18:S2-S9.
93. Rosenbaum S. Women and health insurance: implications for financing preconception health. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18 (suppl):S26-S35.
94. Johnson K, Posner SF, Biermann J, et al. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care-United States: a report of the CDC/ATSDRPreconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55 (RR-6):1-23.
95. Johnson KA. Public finance policy strategies to increase access to preconception care. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10 (suppl):S85-S91.
96. Weir S, Posner HE, Zhang J, et al. Predictors of prenatal and postpartum care adequacy in a Medicaid managed care population. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21:277-285.
97. Slaughter JC, Issel LM, Handler AS, et al. Measuring dosage: a key factor when assessing the relationship between prenatal case management and birth outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1414-1423.
98. Slaughter JC, Issel LM. Developing a measure of prenatal case management dosage. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:1120-1130.
99. Krans, Davis, 2014 op cit.
100. HandlerA, Rankin K, Rosenberg D, et al. Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: Provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:393-405.
101. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the UninsuredCoverage of Preventive Services for Adults in Medicaid. 2012. Available at: http://kaiserfamilyfoundation. files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8359.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2014.
102. Van Dijk JW, Anderko L, Stetzer F. The impact of prenatal care coordination on birth outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40:98-108.
103. Pittard WB, Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Associations between maternal age and infant health outcomes among Medicaid-insured infants in South Carolina: mediating effects of socioeconomic factors. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e100-e106.
104. Staras SA, Kairalla JA, Hou W, et al. Association between perinatal medical expenses and a waiver to increase Florida Healthy Start services within Florida Medicaid programs: 1998 to 2006. Mat Child Health J. 2012;16:1567-1575.
105. Keeton K, Saunders SE, Koltun D. The effect of the family case management program on 1996 birth outcomes in Illinois. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13:207-215.
106. Chi DL, Momany ET, Jones MP, et al. An explanatory model of factors related to well baby visits by age three years for Medicaid-enrolled infants: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13.
107. Gray CL. The pregnancy medical home: use of the power of the Medicaid program to improve the standard of care across North Carolina.NC Med J. 2010;72:232-233.
108. Hillemeier MM, Domino ME, Wells R, et al. Effects of maternity care coordination on pregnancy outcomes: propensity-weighted analyses. Matern Child Health J. 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
109. Mason MV, Poole-Yaeger A, Lucas B, et al. Effects of a pregnancy management program on birth outcomes in managed Medicaid. Manag Care. 2011;20:39-46.
110. Issel LM, Forrestal SG, Slaughter J, et al. A review of prenatal home-visiting effectiveness for improving birth outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40:157-165.
111. Roman L, Raffo JE, Zhu Q, et al. A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: Impact on birth outcomes. JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168:220-227.
112. Adams EK, Markowitz S, Dietz PM, et al. Expansion of Medicaid covered smoking cessation services: maternal smoking and birth outcomes. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013b;3.
113. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG committee opinion no. 561: nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013b;121:911-915.
114. Oshiro BT, Kowalewski L, Sappenfield W, et al. A multistate quality improvement program to decrease elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1025-1031.
115. Ashton DM. Elective delivery at less than 39 weeks. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22: 506-510.
116. Lucas B, Poole-Yaeger A, Istwan N, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of managed Medicaid members prescribed home administration of 17 a-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29:489-496.
117. Mason MV, Poole-Yaeger A, Krueger CR, et al. Impact of 17P usage on NICU admissions in a managed Medicaid population-a five-year review. Manag Care. 2010;19:46-52.
118. Mason MV, House KM, Fuest CM, et al. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) usage in a Medicaid managed care plan and reduction in neonatal intensive care unit days. Manag Care. 2005;14:58-63.
119. Joy S, Rhea DJ, Istwan NB, et al. The risk for preterm labor in women receiving 17 alphahydroxyprogesterone caproate prophylaxis for preterm birth prevention. Am J Perinatol. 2010; 27:343-348.
120. Mason MV, House KM, Linehan J, et al. Optimizing the use of 17P in pregnant managed Medicaid members. Manag Care. 2008;17:47-52.
121. Rittenberg C, Sullivan S, Istwan N, et al.Women receiving 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate hospitalized for preterm labor at less than 34 weeks benefit from daily perinatal nursing surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199: 389e1-389e4.
122. Petrini JR, Callaghan WM, Klebanoff M, et al. Estimated effect of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogerterone caproate on preterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:267-272.
123. Chatterjee S, Kotelchuck M, Sambamoorthi U. Prevalence of chronic illness in pregnancy, access to care, and health care costs: implications for interconception care. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18 (6 suppl):S107-S116.
124. D'Angelo DV, Williams L, Harrison L, et al. Health status and health insurance coverage of women with live-born infants: an opportunity for preventive services after pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16 (suppl 2):222-230.
125. Handler A, Rankin KM, Peacock N, et al. The implementation of interconception care in two community health settings: lessons learned.AmJ Health Promo. 2013;27 (sp3):eS21-eS31.
126. Badura M, Johnson K, Hench K, et al. Healthy start lessons learned on interconception care. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18 (suppl):S61-S66.
127. Biermann J, Dunlop AL, Brady C, et al. Promising practices in preconception care for women at risk for poor health and pregnancy outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10 (suppl):S21-S28.
128. Lu MC, Kotelchuck M, Culhane JF, et al. Preconception care between pregnancies: the content of internatal care. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10:107-122.
129. Adams EK, Kenney GM, Galactionova K. Preventive and reproductive health services for women: the role of California's family planningwaiver. Am J Health Promot. 2013a;27 (suppl):eS1-eS10.
130. Laliberte et al, 2014 op cit.
131. Thurman AR, Janecek T. One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1071-1077.
132. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG committee opinion no. 530: access to postpartum sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:212-215.
133. Borrero S, Zite N, Potter JE, et al. Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy. Contraception. 2013;88:691-696.
134. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Chang R, Howell M, et al. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:311.e1-311.e8.
135. Johnson, 2012 op cit.
136. Markus, Rosenbaum, 2010 op cit.
137. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOGCommittee opinion no. 552: benefits to womenofMedicaid expansion through the Affordable Care Act. Obstet Gynecol. 2013a;121:223-225.
138. Gee RE, Rosenbaum S. The Affordable Care Act: an overview for obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1263-1266.