Going public: Collaborative systems design for multidisciplinary conversations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1670, Issue , 1999, Pages 89-100

  Geisler, Cheryl ^a   Rogers, Edwin H ^a   Tobin, John ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Collaborative classroom ; Conversation; Design conference room ; Multidisciplinary; Private; Public; Reconfigurable collaboration network ; System sharing; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; RECONFIGURABLE ARCHITECTURES; RECONFIGURABLE HARDWARE;

COLLABORATION; COLLABORATION NETWORK; CONFERENCE ROOMS; CONVERSATION; MULTIDISCIPLINARY; PRIVATE; PUBLIC; SYSTEM SHARING; TEAMWORK;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84957643753     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10705432_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bardram, J. (1998). Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In CSCW '98 (pp. 89-98). Seattle: ACM.
2. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L., Gregory, J. (1997). Coordination, cooperation, and communication in the courts. In Y.E. M. Cole, and O. Vasquez, (Eds), Mind, culture, and activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Muller, R. (1997). Coordination in Organizations. In S. Kirn, and G. O'Hare, (Eds.), Cooperative Knowledge Processing: The key technology for intelligent organizations (pp. 26-42). Springer: London.
4. Johnson, B. (1989). How is work coordinated? Implications for computer-based support. In M. Olson (Ed.), Technological support for workgroup collaboration. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Olson, G.M., Olson, J. S., Carter, M. R., Storrosten, M. (1993). Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 7(4): p. 347-374.
6. DeSantis, G., and Monge, M. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/desanctis.html.
7. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Medway, P. (1996). Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructivism in architecture and writing. Written Communication, 13(4): pp. 473-514.
10. Jaryenpaa, S. L., and Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.html.
11. Van House, N., Butler, M. K., and Schiff, L. R. (1998). Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning sets. In Proceedings of CSCW '98. New York: ACM, pp. 335-343.
12. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Bitzer, L. (1978). Rhetoric and public knowledge. In. I. D. M. Burkes (Ed.), Rhetoric, philosophy, and literature: An exploration. W. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
14. Halloran, S. M. (1978). Doing public business in public. In K. Kohrs Campbell and K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. Washington, D. C.: Speech Communication Association.
15. Clark, G., and Halloran, S. M. (1993). Oratorical culture in nineteenth-century America: Transformation in theory and practice. Carbondale, ILL: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Phillips, K. (1996). The space of public dissension: Reconsidering the public sphere. Communication Monographs, 63, pp. 231-248.
17. Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., and Grundin, J. (1993). Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4): pp. 349-375.
18. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C. (1998). Fragmented interaction: Establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments, In Proceedings of CSCW '98, New York: ACM, pp. 217-226.
19. Gay, G., Sturgill, A., Martin, W., and Huttenlocher, D. (1999). Document-centered peer collaborations: An exploration of the educational uses of networked communication technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 4 (3), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/gay.html.
20. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of Science, 19 (3), p. 387.
21. Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in engineering. Science, Technology, and Human Valuesw, 16 (4), pp. 448-473.
22. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrosten, M, and Carter, M. (1993). Groupwork close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11 (4), p. 321-348.
23. Finholt, T., and Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8 (1), pp. 28-36.
24. Olsen, D. R., Hudson, S., Phelps, M., Heiner, J., and Verratti, T. (1998). In Proceedings of CSCW '98, New York: ACM, pp. 129-138.
25. Myers, B., Steil, H., and Gargiulo, R. (1998). Collaboration using multiple PDAs connected to a PC. In Proceedings of CSCW '98, New York: ACM, pp. 285-294.
26. Katzenback, J. R., and Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, pp. 111-120.
27. Barrett, E. (1993). Collaboration in the electronic classroom. Technology Review, pp. 51-55.