Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles? - Driving patterns and economics in Sweden and Germany

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 65, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-15

  Jakobsson, Niklas ^a   Gnann, Till ^b   Plötz, Patrick ^b   Sprei, Frances ^a   Karlsson, Sten ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Battery electric vehicles; Driving pattern; Early adopter; Electric vehicles; Multi car households

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES; COMMERCE; COMPETITION; ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES; ELECTRIC VEHICLES;

DRIVING PATTERN; EARLY ADOPTER; ECONOMIC CONDITION; MARKET VIABILITIES; MULTI-CAR HOUSEHOLDS; PERCENTAGE POINTS; TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP; TRANSPORT SECTORS;

BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES;

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

GERMANY; SWEDEN;

EID: 84957599813     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anable J., Schuitema G., Skippon S., Kinnear N. Who will adopt electric vehicles? A segmentation approach of UK consumers. Presented at the ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, June 5-11, 2011 2011, Belambra Presqu'lle de Giens, France.
2. Barter, G.E., Tamor, M.A., Manley, D.K., West, T.H., 2015. The implications of modeling range and infrastructure barriers to battery electric vehicle adoption. In: Presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Jan 11-15, 2015, Washinton DC, USA.
3. Biere D., Dallinger D., Wietschel M. Ökonomische Analyse der Erstnutzer von Elektrofahrzeugen. Z. für Energiewirtschaft 2009, 33:173-181. 10.1007/s12398-009-0020-2.
4. Björnsson L.-H., Karlsson S. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: how individual movement patterns affect battery requirements, the potential to replace conventional fuels, and economic viability. Appl. Energy 2015, 143:336-347. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.041.
5. Bolduc D., Boucher N., Alvarez-Daziano R. Hybrid choice modeling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2008, 2082:63-71. 10.3141/2082-08.
6. Chan C.C. The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles. Proc. IEEE 2007, 95:704-718. 10.1109/JPROC.2007.892489.
7. Curtin R., Shrago Y., Mikkelsen J. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles 2009, University of Michigan, An Arbor, USA.
8. Dargay J.M. Determinants of car ownership in rural and urban areas: a pseudo-panel analysis. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2002, 38:351-366. 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00019-9.
9. Egbue O., Long S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy Spec. Sect.: Front. Sustain. 2012, 48:717-729. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009.
10. Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF), 2014. Übersicht zur Kraftfahrzeugsteuer für Personenwagen, Berlin, Germany.
11. Figenbaum, E., Kolbenstvedt, M., 2013. Electromobility in Norway - Experiences and Opportunities With Electric Vehicles. TØI Report 1281/2013. Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Center for Transport Research, Oslo, Norway.
12. Gnann, T., 2015. Market Diffusion of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Their Charging Infrastructure (Ph.D. thesis). Fraunhofer Publishing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
13. Gnann T., Plötz P., Kühn A., Wietschel M. Modelling market diffusion of electric vehicles with real world driving data - German market and policy options. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2015, 77:95-112. 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.001.
14. Golob T.F., Gould J. Projecting use of electric vehicles from household vehicle trials. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 1998, 32:441-454. 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00001-0.
15. Greene D.L. Estimating daily vehicle usage distributions and the implications for limited-range vehicles. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., Special Issue Economic Models of Automobile Demand 1985, 19:347-358. 10.1016/0191-2615(85)90041-4.
16. Heffner R.R., Kurani K.S., Turrentine T.S. Symbolism in California's early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2007, 12:396-413. 10.1016/j.trd.2007.04.003.
17. Helms H., Jöhrens J., Hanusch J., Höpfner U., Lambrecht U., Pehnt M. UMBReLA Umweltbilanzen Elektromobilität 2011, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
18. Hidrue M.K., Parsons G.R., Kempton W., Gardner M.P. Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 2011, 33:686-705. 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002.
19. Horne M., Jaccard M., Tiedemann K. Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions. Energy Econ. 2005, 27:59-77. 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.11.003.
20. International Energy Agency, 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012, Paris, France.
21. Jong G.D., Fox J., Daly A., Pieters M., Smit R. Comparison of car ownership models. Transp. Rev. 2004, 24:379-408. 10.1080/0144164032000138733.
22. Karlsson, S., 2013. The Swedish Car Movement Data Project Final Report. (Report). Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
23. Khan M., Kockelman K.M. Predicting the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles using multiday GPS data. Energy Policy 2012, 46:225-233. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.055.
24. Kley, F., 2011. Ladeinfrastrukturen für Elektrofahrzeuge - Analyse und Bewertung einer Aufbaustrategie auf Basis des Fahrverhaltens (Ph.D. thesis). Fraunhofer Publishing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
25. Kurani K.S., Turrentine T., Sperling D. Testing electric vehicle demand in "hybrid households" using a reflexive survey. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 1996, 1:131-150. 10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00007-7.
26. Lin Z. Optimizing and diversifying electric vehicle driving range for U.S. drivers. Transp. Sci. 2014, 48:635-650. 10.1287/trsc.2013.0516.
27. Mau P., Eyzaguirre J., Jaccard M., Collins-Dodd C., Tiedemann K. The "neighbor effect": simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68:504-516. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.007.
28. McKinsey & Company, 2012. Die Energiewende in Deutschland - Anspruch, Wirklichkeit und Perspektiven, Berlin, Germany.
29. MOP, 2010. Mobilitätspanel Deutschland 1994-2010 (Project conducted by the Institute for Transport Studies at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)). Karlsruhe, Germany.
30. Parrish D.D., Singh H.B., Molina L., Madronich S. Air quality progress in North American megacities: a review. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:7015-7025. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.039.
31. Pearre N.S., Kempton W., Guensler R.L., Elango V.V. Electric vehicles: how much range is required for a day's driving?. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2011, 19:1171-1184. 10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.010.
32. Peters A., Agosti R., Popp M., Ryf B. Electric mobility - a survey of different consumer groups in Germany with regard to adoption. Presented at the ECEEE Summer Study 2011, June 5-11, 2011 2011, Belambra Presqu'lle de Giens, France.
33. Pfahl S. Alternative Antriebskonzepte: Stand der Technik und Perspektiven-Die Sicht der Automobilindustrie. Alternative Antriebskonzepte bei sich wandelnden Mobilitätsstilen: Tagungsbeiträge vom 08. und 09. März 2012 am KIT, Karlsruhe 2013, 81-108. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, Germany. P. Jochem, W.-R. Poganietz, A. Grunwald, W. Fichtner (Eds.).
34. Plötz, P., 2014. How to estimate the probability of rare long-distance trips (No. S1/2014). Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation, Fraunhofer Institute for System and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany.
35. Plötz, P., Gnann, T., Wietschel, M., Kühn, A., 2013. Markthochlaufszenarien für Elektrofahrzeuge - Langfassung. Commissioned by acatech - German National Academy of Science and Engineering and Working Group 7 of the German National Platform for Electric Mobility (NPE), Fraunhofer Institute for System and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany.
36. Plötz P., Jakobsson N., Sprei F., Karlsson S. On the distribution of individual daily vehicle driving distances. Presented at the European Electric Vehicle Congress Brussels, Belgium, 3rd-5th December 2014 2014, Chalmers Publication Library (CPL).
37. Plötz P., Schneider U., Globisch J., Dütschke E. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2014, 67:96-109. 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006.
38. Propfe, B., Redelbach, M., Santini, D.J., Friedrich, H., 2012. Cost analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles including maintenance & repair costs and resale values. In: Presented at the EVS26 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Los Angeles, California, USA.
39. Sprei F., Macharis C., Lebeau K., Karlström M. Policy incentives for market introduction of electric vehicles. System Perspectives on Electromobility 2013, Chalmers, Göteborg.
40. Statens offentliga utredningar, 2013, Fossilfrihet på väg, SOU2013:84. Stockholm, Sweden.
41. Svenska Petroleum och Biodrivmedel Institutet. < (accessed on 14.10.27). http://spbi.se.
42. Tamor M.A., Milačić M. Electric vehicles in multi-vehicle households. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2015, 56:52-60. 10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.023.
43. Transportstyrelsen, n.d. Supermiljöbilspremie - Transportstyrelsen [WWW Document]. (accessed 14.10.27). http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/Kontakta-oss/Stall-fragor-lamna-synpunkter-eller-information/Vanliga-fragor-till-Transportstyrelsen/Supermiljobilspremie/.
44. Turrentine T., Garas D., Lentz A., Woodjack J. The UC Davis MINI E Consumer Study. Inst. Transp. Stud. Univ. Calif. UC Davis Inst. Transp. Stud. Res. Rep. 2011, 5.