Significance: recognizing the value of research across national and linguistic boundaries

Asia Pacific Education Review

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 347-354

  Anderson Levitt, Kathryn M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic discourse communities; Educational research; English for academic purposes; Faculty publishing; Globalization; Intercultural communication; Peer evaluation; Writing for publication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957441522     PISSN: 15981037     EISSN: 1876407X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-014-9322-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Border crossings: Towards a comparative pedagogy. Comparative Education,37(4), 507–523.
2. Anderson, S., Gulløv, E., & Valentin, K. (2011). Educational anthropology in a welfare state perspective: The case of Scandinavia. In K. M. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education (pp. 193–211). New York: Berghahn Books.
3. Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2011). Anthropologies and ethnographies of education worldwide. In K. M. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education: A global guide to ethnographic studies of learning and schooling (pp. 1–28). New York: Berghahn Books.
4. Asquith, P. J. (1999). The “world system” of anthropology and “professional others”. In E. L. Cerroni-Long (Ed.), Anthropological theory in North America (pp. 33–53). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
5. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/bazerman_shaping/.
6. Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). ‘‘Nondiscursive’’ requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication,13, 435–472.
7. Das, J., Do, Q.-T., Shaines, K., & Srinivasan, S. (2009). U.S. and them: The geography of academic research. Policy research working paper 5152. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Development research group. Poverty and inequality team & human development and public services team.
8. Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fighting familiarity: Essays on education and ethnography. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9. Diallo, B. B. (2011). Sociological and ethnographic research in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa. In K. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education (pp. 279–302). New York: Berghahn Books.
10. Eröss, G. (2011). Central Europe (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia). In K. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education (pp. 151–166). New York: Berghahn Books.
11. Fischman, G. E., Alperin, J. P., & Willinsky, J. (2010). Visibility and quality in Spanish-language Latin American scholarly publishing. Information technologies & international development, 6(4). http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewArticle/639
12. Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes,7, 77–86.
13. Gingras, Y., & Mosbah-Natanson, S. (2010). Where are social sciences produced? In UNESCO (Ed.), World social science report (pp. 149–153). Paris: UNESCO & International Social Science Council.
14. Gobbo, F. (2011). Anthropology of education in Italy. In K. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Mapping anthropologies of education (pp. 151–165). New York: Berghahn Books.
15. Hamel, R. E. (2007). The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review,20, 53–71.
16. Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2012). Who’s citing whose writings? Journal of English for Academic Purposes,9, 102–115.
17. Hyland, K. (2011). Disciplines and discourses: Social interactions in the construction of knowledge. In D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Paré, N. Artemeva, M. Horne, & L. Yousoubova (Eds.), Writing in knowledge societies. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
18. Jacquin, M. (2006). La revue anthropology and education quarterly. Analyse des dix dernières années. Éducation et Sociétés,17, 89–104.
19. Kim, M.-J. (2010). Visibility of Korean science journals: An analysis between citation measures among international composition of editorial board and foreign authorship. Scientometrics,84(2), 505–522. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0168-x.
20. Ko, Y., Cho, S.-R., & Park, Y. (2011). A study on the optimization of KCI-based index (Kor-Factor) in evaluating Korean journals. Scientometrics,88(1), 61–71. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0384-z.
21. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Larsson, S. (2006). Ethnography in action. How ethnography was established in Swedish educational research. Ethnography and Education,1, 177–195.
23. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York: Routledge.
24. Lillis, T. M., Magyar, A., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2010). An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: Developing a writing for publication programme. Compare,40(6), 781–800.
25. Mišak, A., Marušić, M., & Marušić, A. (2005). Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal. Journal of Second Language Writing,14(2), 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.001.
26. Mweru, M. (2010). Why Kenyan academics do not publish in international refereed journals. In UNESCO (Ed.), World social science report (pp. 110–111). Paris: UNESCO & International Social Science Council.
27. Negishi, M., Sun, Y., & Shigi, K. (2004). Citation database for Japanese papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society. Scientometrics,60(3), 333–351. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034378.38698.b2.
28. Ollion, É. (2011). De la sociologie en Amérique. Éléments pour une sociologie de la sociologie étasunienne contemporaine. Sociologie,2(3), 277–294.
29. Ouyang, H. (2011). Bamboo shoots after rain: Educational anthropology and ethnography in Mainland China. In K. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education (pp. 235–255). New York: Berghahn Books.
30. Peters, M. A. (2009). Academic publishing and the political economy of education journals. In B. W. Cope & A. Phillips (Eds.), The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
31. Raveaud, M., & Draelants, H. (2011). Ethnographies of education in the French-speaking world. In K. M. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Anthropologies of education (pp. 131–149). New York: Berghahn Books.
32. Robinson-García, N. (2012). How to publish in journals with impact? Retrieved July 19, 2012, from http://www.slideshare.net/figaro/how-to-publish-in-journals-with-impact.
33. Rockwell, E. (2002). Constructing diversity and civility in the United States and Latin America. In B. A. U. Levinson, S. L. Cade, A. Padawer, & A. P. Elvir (Eds.), Ethnography and educational policy across the Americas (pp. 3–19). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
34. Sapiro, G. (2008). Translatio. Le marché de la traduction en France à l’heure de la mondialisation. Paris: CNRS.
35. Schriewer, J., & Keiner, E. (1993). Communication patterns and intellectual traditions in educational sciences: France and Germany. Comparative Education Review,36, 25–51.
36. Su, X., Deng, S., & Shen, S. (2012). The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 98, 1567–1582. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0921-4.
37. Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,7(4), 250–263.
38. Weil, J. (2013). The world anthropology section: An introduction. American Anthropologist,115(4), 656–657. doi:10.1111/aman.12054.
39. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Yitzhaki, M. (1998). The ‘language preference’ in sociology: Measures of ‘language self-citation’, ‘relative own-language preference indicator’, and ‘mutual use of languages’. Scientometrics,41, 243–254.