Entropy–based, multiple-portal-to-3dct registration for prostate radiotherapy using iteratively estimated segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1679, Issue , 1999, Pages 567-579

  Bansal, Ravi ^a   Staib, Lawrence H ^a   Chen, Zhe ^b   Rangarajan, Anand ^a   Knisely, Jonathan ^b   Nath, Ravinder ^b   Duncan, James S ^a  

^a Departments of Electrical Engineering and Diagnostic Radiology   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ENTROPY; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION THEORY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOTHERAPY;

ACCURATE ESTIMATION; COORDINATE DESCENT; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; ITERATIVE FASHION; NOISE CONDITIONS; PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY; TRANSFORMATION PARAMETERS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 84957105657     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10704282_61     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. R. Bansal, L. Staib, Z. Chen, A. Rangarajan, J. Knisely, R. Nath, and J.S. Duncan. A novel approach for the registration of 2D portal and 3D CT images for treatment setup verification in radiotherapy. Medical Image Computing and Computer– Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’98), LNCS–1496:1075–1086, 10–12 October 1998.
2. R. Bansal, L. Staib, et al. A minimax entropy registration framework for patient setup verification in radiotherapy: Evaluation and comparisons. Technical Report YALE–IPAG–TR–1999-01, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, Jan 1999.
3. Martin Berger and Guido Gerig. Motion Measurments in Low–Contrast X–ray Imagery. In W.M. Wells et al., editors, Medical Image Computing and Computer– Assisted Intervention –MICCAI’98, volume 1496 of LNCS, pages 832–841, 1998.
4. R. M. Bevensee. Maximum EntropySol utions to Scientific Problems. P T R Prentice Hall, 1993.
5. J. Bijhold et al. Radiation field edge detection in portal images. Phys. Med. Biol., 36(12):1705–1710, 1991.
6. A. Collignon, F. Maes, et al. Automated multimodality image registration using information theory. Info. Proc. in Med. Imaging (IPMI), pages 263–274, 1995.
7. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J. Royal Statistical Soc., Ser. B, 39:1–38, 1977.
8. L. Dong and A. L. Boyer. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys., 33(5):1053–1060, 1995.
9. R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 1973.
10. D. S. Fritsch et al. Core–based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification. Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys., 33(5):1287–1300, 1995.
11. K. Gilhuijs. Automated verification of radiation treatment geometry. PhD thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam, Radiotherapy dept., the Netherlands, 1995.
12. K. Gilhuijs et al. Interactive three dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images and computed tomography data. Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 34(4):873–885, 1996.
13. J. Hanley et al. The effects of out–of–plane rotations on two dimensional portal image registration in conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. Int. J. Radiation OncologyBi ol. Phys., 33(5):1331–1343, 1995.
14. D. H. Hiristov and B. G. Fallone. A gray–level image alignment algorithm for registration of portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med. Phys., 23(1):75–84, Jan 1996.
15. J. H. Hubble. Photon Cross Sections, Attenuation Coefficients, and EnergyA bsorption Coefficients From 10KeV to 100 GeV. Nat. Stand. Ref. Data. Ser., Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), August 1969.
16. E. T. Jaynes. Prior probabilities. In R. D. Rosenkrantz, editor, E. T. Jaynes: Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics, volume 158, pages 114–130. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston. USA, 1983.
17. S. Kirkpatrick et al. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220:671–680, 1983.
18. S. Lavallee, R. Szeliski, and L. Brunie. Anatomy–based registration of three–dimensional medical images, range images, X–ray projections, and three– dimensional models using octree–splines. In Russell H. Taylor et al., editors, Computer–Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pages 115143. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
19. L. Lemieux et al. A patient–to–computed–tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med. Phys., 21(11):1749–1760, November 1994.
20. K. W. Leszczynski, S. Loose, and S. Boyko. An image registration scheme applied to verification of radiation therapy. The British Journal of Radiology, 71(844):413–426, 1998.
21. H. Meertens, J. Bijhold, and J. Strackee. A method for the measurement of field displacement errors in digital portal images. Phy. Med. Biol., 35(3):299–323, 1990.
22. C. D. Mubata, A. M. Bidmead, et al. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose– escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys., 40(1):221–231, 1998.
23. W. D. Neve, F. Heuvel, et al. Interactive use of on–line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. Int. J. Radiation OncologyBi ol. Phys., 25:517–524, 1993.
24. C. Studholme et al. Incorporating connected region labelling into automated image registration using mutual information. In Proc. of MMBIA’96, pages 23–31, 1996.
25. P. Viola and W. M. Wells. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Fifth Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 16–23, 1995.
26. J. Weese et al. 2D/3D registration of pre–operative ct images and intra–operative x–ray projections for image guided surgery. In H.Lemke et al., editors, Comp. Assist. Rad. and Surg., pages 833–838. 1997.