Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: An analysis of 297 shoulders

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 763-771

  Mollon, Brent ^a   Mahure, Siddharth A ^a   Roche, Christopher P ^b   Zuckerman, Joseph D ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b Exactech   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender differences in reverse total shoulder; Glenosphere diameter; Glenosphere size; Glenosphere size and clinical outcomes; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Reverse total shoulder clinical outcomes

Indexed keywords

ACROMION; ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGEONS SCORE; ARTICLE; BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SHOULDER; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE PARALYSIS; PAIN SEVERITY; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; REVERSE SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY GLENOSPHERE; SCAPULA FRACTURE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHOULDER ACTIVE EXTERNAL ROTATION; SHOULDER ACTIVE FORWARD ELEVATION; SHOULDER PAIN; STRESS FRACTURE; SURGICAL INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROTATION; SHOULDER; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; SHOULDER REPLACEMENT; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, SHOULDER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; SHOULDER JOINT; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84957089993     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: 15326500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Acevedo D.C., Vanbeek C., Lazarus M.D., Williams G.R., Abboud J.A. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014, 23:279-289. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.003.
2. Berhouet J., Garaud P., Favard L. Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014, 23:151-158. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.009.
3. Berhouet J., Garaud P., Favard L. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013, 99:887-894. 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008.
4. Bloch H.R., Budassi P., Bischof A., Agneskirchner J., Domenghini C., Frattini M., et al. Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2014, 6:156-164. 10.1177/1758573214535574.
5. Boughebri O., Duparc F., Adam J.M., Valenti P. Arthroscopic dynamic analysis of scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011, 97:779-784. 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.07.014.
6. Chou J., Malak S.F., Anderson I.A., Astley T., Poon P.C. Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:354-359. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.015.
7. Clouthier A.L., Hetzler M.A., Fedorak G., Bryant J.T., Deluzio K.J., Bicknell R.T. Factors affecting the stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013, 22:439-444. 10.1016/j.jse.2012.05.032.
8. de Wilde L.F., Poncet D., Middernacht B., Ekelund A. Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:719-726. 10.3109/17453674.2010.538354.
9. Favard L., Levigne C., Nerot C., Gerber C., De Wilde L., Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:2469-2475. 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y.
10. Flurin P.H., Marczuk Y., Janout M., Wright T.W., Zuckerman J., Roche C.P. Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013, 71(Suppl 2):101-107.
11. Giles J.W., Langohr G.D., Johnson J.A., Athwal G.S. Implant design variations in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the required deltoid force and resultant joint load. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015, 473:3615-3626. 10.1007/s11999-015-4526-0.
12. Groh G.I., Groh G.M. Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014, 23:388-394. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.002.
13. Gutierrez S., Comiskey C.A., Luo Z.P., Pupello D.R., Frankle M.A. Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2606-2615. 10.2106/JBJS.H.00012.
14. Gutierrez S., Levy J.C., Frankle M.A., Cuff D., Keller T.S., Pupello D.R., et al. Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 17:608-615. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.010.
15. Henninger H.B., King F.K., Tashjian R.Z., Burks R.T. Biomechanical comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems in soft tissue-constrained shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014, 23:e108-17. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.008.
16. Jain N.B., Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014, 23:1905-1912. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.055.
17. King J.J., Farmer K.W., Struk A.M., Wright T.W. Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015, 39:291-298. 10.1007/s00264-014-2593-6.
18. Klein S.M., Dunning P., Mulieri P., Pupello D., Downes K., Frankle M.A. Effects of acquired glenoid bone defects on surgical technique and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:1144-1154. 10.2106/JBJS.I.00778.
19. Langohr G.D., Giles J.W., Athwal G.S., Johnson J.A. The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015, 24:972-979. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018.
20. Melis B., DeFranco M., Ladermann A., Mole D., Favard L., Nerot C., et al. An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:1240-1246. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.25926.
21. Nam D., Kepler C.K., Nho S.J., Craig E.V., Warren R.F., Wright T.M. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010, 19:1003-1012. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.014.
22. Nyffeler R.W., Werner C.M., Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:524-528. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010.
23. Poon P.C., Chou J., Young S.W., Astley T. A comparison of concentric and eccentric glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014, 96:e138. 10.2106/JBJS.M.00941.
24. Roche C., Flurin P.H., Wright T., Crosby L.A., Mauldin M., Zuckerman J.D. An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:734-741. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.008.
25. Roche C.P., Marczuk Y., Wright T.W., Flurin P.H., Grey S., Jones R., et al. Scapular notching and osteophyte formation after reverse shoulder replacement: radiological analysis of implant position in male and female patients. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B:530-535. 10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.30442.
26. Roche C.P., Marczuk Y., Wright T.W., Flurin P.H., Grey S.G., Jones R.B., et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: validation of a computer impingement model. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013, 71:278-283.
27. Roche C.P., Stroud N.J., Martin B.L., Steiler C.A., Flurin P.H., Wright T.W., et al. The impact of scapular notching on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013, 22:963-970. 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.035.
28. Simovitch R.W., Zumstein M.A., Lohri E., Helmy N., Gerber C. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:588-600. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00226.
29. Tashjian R.Z., Burks R.T., Zhang Y., Henninger H.B. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation of humeral and glenosphere hardware configuration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015, 24:e68-77. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.017.
30. Walker M., Willis M.P., Brooks J.P., Pupello D., Mulieri P.J., Frankle M.A. The use of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012, 21:514-522. 10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.006.