Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Validation of a computer impingement model

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 278-283

  Roche, Christopher P ^a   Marczuk, Yann ^b   Wright, Thomas W ^c   Flurin, Pierre Henri ^d   Grey, Sean G ^e   Jones, Richard B ^f   Routman, Howard D ^g   Gilot, Gregory J ^h   Zuckerman, Joseph D ⁱ  

^a Exactech Inc   (United States)

^b Chenieux Clinic   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d Clinique du sport de Bordeaux Merignac   (France)

^e Orthopaedic Center of the Rockies   (United States)

^f Southeastern Sports Medicine   (United States)

^g Atlantis Orthopaedics   (United States)

^h DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

ⁱ NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DISEASE; COMPUTER MODEL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SCAPULA; SCAPULAR NOTCHING; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERY ELDERLY; FEMALE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVERSE SHOULDER PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCAPULA; SHOULDER JOINT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84891524892     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, et al. Geometric analysis of the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: an evaluation of the relationship between prosthetic design parameters and clinical failure modes. Presented at the annual ISTA Meeting, 2006.
2. Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, et al. An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct; 18(5): 734-41. doi: 10. 1016/j. jse. 2008. 12. 008.
3. Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, et al. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar; 89(3): 588-600.
4. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, et al. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr; 86(3): 388-95.
5. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct; 14(5): 524-8.
6. Kontaxis A, Johnson GR. The biomechanics of reverse anatomy shoulder replacement-a modeling study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Mar; 24(3): 254-60.
7. Middernacht B, De Roo PJ, Van Maele G, De Wilde LF. Consequences of scapular anatomy for reversed total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jun; 466(6): 1410-8. doi: 10. 1007/s11999-008-0187-6.
8. De Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B, et al. Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec; 81(6): 719-26. doi: 10. 3109/17453674. 2010. 538354.
9. Chou J, Malak SF, Anderson IA, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3): 354-9. doi: 10. 1016/j. jse. 2009. 01. 015.
10. Lévigne C, Garret J, Boileau P, et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep; 469(9): 2512-20. doi: 10. 1007/s11999-010-1695-8.