Preserving genome privacy in research studies

Medical Data Privacy Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 425-441

  Wang, Shuang ^a   Jiang, Xiaoqian ^a   Fox, Dov ^b   Ohno Machado, Lucila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; GENES; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

BIOMEDICAL COMMUNITY; CLINICAL INFORMATION; DATA ANALYSIS METHODS; DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS; MULTIPLE COMPONENTS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINES; SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

DATA PRIVACY;

EID: 84956975223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23633-9_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Howe, D., Costanzo, M., Fey, P., et al.: Big data: the future of biocuration. Nature 455, 47–50 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/455047a. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
2. HiSeq X Ten.: 1000 dollar genome sequencing. http://www.illumina.com/systems/hiseq-xsequencing-system.ilmn. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
3. Abecasis, G.R., Auton, A., Brooks, L.D., et al.: An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012). doi:10.1038/nature11632
4. Fu, W., O’Connor, T.D., Jun, G., et al.: Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature 493, 216–220 (2013). doi:10.1038/nature11690
5. Park, J.-H., Wacholder, S., Gail, M.H., et al.: Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat. Genet. 42, 570–575. (2010). doi:10.1038/ng.610
6. Marx, V.: Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature 498, 255–260 (2013). doi:10.1038/498255a
7. Bradbury, A.R., Dignam, J.J., Ibe, C.N., et al. How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family’s risk for cancer? a study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 3705–3711 (2007). doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1900
8. Willard, H.F., Angrist, M., Ginsburg, G.S.: Genomic medicine: genetic variation and its impact on the future of health care. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 1543–1550 (2005). doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1683
9. Pulley, J.M., Denny, J.C., Peterson, J.F., et al.: Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: the design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 92, 87–95 (2012). doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.371
10. Collins, F.S., Varmus, H.: A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 793–795 (2015)
11. Visscher, P.M., Brown, M.A., McCarthy, M.I., et al.: Five years of GWAS discovery. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 7–24 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029
12. Mailman, M.D., Feolo, M., Jin, Y., et al.: The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 39, 1181–1186 (2007). doi:10.1038/ng1007-1181
13. NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy.: http://gds.nih.gov/03policy2.html (2014)
14. Lin, Z., Owen, A.B., Altman, R.B.: Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Science 305, 183 (2004). doi:10.1126/science.1095019
15. Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., et al.: Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000167 (2008)
16. Gymrek, M., McGuire, A.L., Golan, D., et al.: Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 339, 321–324 (2013)
17. Nyholt, D.R., Yu, C.-E., Visscher, P.M.: On Jim Watson’s APOE status: genetic information is hard to hide. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 147–149 (2009). doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.198
18. Wang, R., Li, Y.F., Wang, X., et al.: Learning your identity and disease from research papers. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security - CCS ’09, vol. 534. ACM Press, New York (2009). doi:10.1145/1653662.1653726
19. Humbert, M., Ayday, E., Hubaux, J.-P., et al.: Addressing the concerns of the Lacks family: quantification of kin genomic privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security - CCS ’13, 1141–1152. ACM Press, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2508859.2516707
20. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.: (2008), http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/gina.cfm. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
21. McGuire, A.L., Caulfield, T., Cho, M.K.: Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 152–156 (2008). doi:10.1038/nrg2302
22. Caulfield, T., McGuire, A.L., Cho, M., et al.: Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol. 6, e73 (2008). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060073
23. Sankararaman, S., Obozinski, G., Jordan, M.I., et al.: Genomic privacy and limits of individual detection in a pool. Nat. Genet. 41, 965–967 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.436. Accessed 18 Apr 2014
24. Amsterdam Workshop on Genome Privacy. http://seclab.soic.indiana.edu/GenomePrivacy (2014)
25. iDASH 2014 Genome Privacy Protection Challenge Workshop. http://www.humangenomeprivacy.org/2014 (2014)
26. iDASH 2015 Privacy and Security Workshop. http://www.humangenomeprivacy.org/2015/. Accessed 02 Jan, 2015
27. Dwork, C.: Differential privacy. Int. Colloq. Autom. Lang. Program. 405, 2:1–2:12 (2006)
28. Sweeney, L.: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 10, 557–570 (2002)
29. Li, N., Li, T., Venkatasubramanian, S.: t closeness?: privacy beyond k-anonymity and - diversity. In: IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, 106–115. IEEE (2007). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4221659
30. Yu, F., Fienberg, S.E., Slavkovic, A.B., et al.: Scalable privacy-preserving data sharing methodology for genome-wide association studies. J. Biomed. Inform. Published Online First: 6 February (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.008
31. Policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH supported or conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (2007). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
32. Committees the NI of HGDSG.: Data use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directions. Nat. Genet. 46, 934–938 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.3062
33. NIH security best practices for controlled-access data subject to the NIH genomic data sharing (GDS) policy. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/pdf/dbgap_2b_security_procedures.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2015
34. Dondorp, W. J., deWert, G.M.W.R.: The ‘thousand-dollar genome’: an ethical exploration. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21:6–26 (2013)
35. Maryland v. King. S. Ct. 2013;133:1958
36. Maryland v. King. S. Ct. 2013;133:1967
37. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
38. New rule protects patient privacy, secures health information. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/01/20130117b.html. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
39. HIPAA Privacy Rule, 45 C.F.R. § 164 (2014)
40. Nass, S.J., Levit, L.A., Gostin, L.O.: Beyond the HIPAA privacy rule: enhancing privacy, improving health through research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2009)
41. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/commonrule/. Accessed 12 Mar 2015
42. Human Subject Research Protections, 76 Fed. Reg. 44,512, 44,524–25 (July 26, 2011)
43. Baser v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137602, at *11 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2014); Steinberg v. CVS Caremark Corp., 899 F. Supp. 2d 331-336 (E.D. Pa. 2012)
44. E.g. Dumas v. Hurley Med. Ctr., 837 F. Supp. 2d 655, 659 (E.D. Mich. 2011); Bell v. PSS World Med., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183288 M.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2012; Culbreth v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37335 D. Md. Mar. 19, 201
45. Lee v. City of Moraine Fire Dep’t, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61385, at *16 (S.D. Ohio May 2, 2014)
46. Poore v. Peterbilt of Bristol, L.L.C., 852 F. Supp. 2d 727, 730–31 (W.D. Va. 2012)
47. Slaughter, L.: Genetic information non-discrimination act. Harv. J. Legis. 50, 41 (2013)
48. For the study of bioethical issues PC. Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing (2012)
49. California Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (2011). http://geneticprivacynetwork.org/about-calgina/. Accessed 11 Jul 2014
50. Alaska Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (2014). http://doa.alaska.gov/dop/fileadmin/Equal_Employment/pdf/EEOP_Policy_Statement.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2015
51. Prince, A.E.R.: Comprehensive protection of genetic information. Brooklyn Law Rev. 79, 175–227 (2013)
52. Lindor, N.M.: Personal autonomy in the genomic era. In: Video Proceedings of Mayo Clinic Individualizing Medicine Conference (2012)
53. Khan, A., Capps, B.J., Sum, M.Y., et al.: Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review. Clin. Genet. 86, 199–206 (2014)
54. Wolf, S.M., Crock, B.N., Van Ness, B., et al.:Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet. Med. 14, 361–384 (2012)
55. Rodriguez, L.L., Brooks, L.D., Greenberg, J.H., et al.: The complexities of genomic identifiability. Science 339, 275–276 (2013)
56. Ball, M.P., Bobe, J.R., Chou, M.F., et al.: Harvard personal genome project: lessons from participatory public research. Genome Med. 6, 10 (2014)
57. Naveed, M., Ayday, E., Clayton, E.W., et al.: Privacy and security in the genomic era. Published Online First: 8 May 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1891. Accessed 11 Aug 2014
58. Lin, Z., Owen, A.B., Altman, R.B. Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Science 305, 183 (2004). doi:10.1126/science.1095019
59. Ayday, E., De Cristofaro, E., Hubaux, J.-P., et al. Whole genome sequencing: revolutionary medicine or privacy nightmare? Computer (Long Beach Calif) 48, 58–66 (2015). doi:10.1109/MC.2015.59
60. Erlich, Y., Narayanan, A.: Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 409–421 (2014). doi:10.1038/nrg3723
61. Lauter, K., Lopez-Alt, A., Naehrig, M.: Private computation on encrypted genomic data. In: 14th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium, Workshop on Genome Privacy. http://seclab.soic.indiana.edu/GenomePrivacy/papers/Genome%20Privacy-paper9.pdf. (2014). 29 July 2014, date last accessed
62. Bos, J.W., Lauter, K., Naehrig, M.: Private predictive analysis on encrypted medical data. J. Biomed. Inform. 50, 234–243 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.003
63. Cheon, J.H., Kim, M., Lauter, K.: Homomorphic computation of edit distance. In: WAHC’15 - 3rd Workshop on Encrypted Computing and Applied Homomorphic Cryptography (2015)
64. Homomorphic_Encryption.: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homomorphic_encryption&oldid=653811034 (2015). Accessed 29 Mar 2015
65. Check Hayden, E.: Cloud cover protects gene data. Nature 519, 400–401 (2015). doi:10.1038/519400a
66. Ayday, E., Raisaro, J.L., Hengartner, U., et al.: Privacy-preserving processing of raw genomic data. Data Priv. Manag. Auton. Spontaneous Secur. 8247, 133–147 (2014). http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/187573. Accessed 31 Mar 2015
67. Huang, Z., Ayday, E., Fellay, J., et al.: GenoGuard: protecting genomic data against bruteforce attacks. In: 36th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P 2015), San Jose (2015). http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/206772. Accessed 31 Mar 2015
68. Danezis, G.: Simpler protocols for privacy-preserving disease susceptibility testing. In: 14th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium, Workshop on Genome Privacy (GenoPri’14), Amsterdam (2014)
69. Djatmiko, M., Friedman, A., Boreli, R., et al.: Secure evaluation protocol for personalized medicine. In: 14th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium, Workshop on Genome Privacy (GenoPri’14), Amsterdam (2014)
70. Lu, W., Yamada, Y., Sakuma, J.: Efficient secure outsourcing of genome-wide association studies. In: 2nd International Workshop on Genome Privacy and Security (GenoPri’15), San Jose (2015)
71. Duverle, D., Kawasaki, S., Yamada, Y., et al.: Privacy-preserving statistical analysis by exact logistic regression. In: 2nd International Workshop on Genome Privacy and Security (GenoPri’15), San Jose (2015)
72. Kantarcioglu, M., Jiang, W., Liu, Y., et al.: A cryptographic approach to securely share and query genomic sequences. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12, 606–617 (2008). doi:10.1109/TITB.2007.908465
73. Malin, B.A.: Protecting genomic sequence anonymity with generalization lattices. Methods Inf. Med. 44, 687–692 (2005). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16400377. Accessed 12 Jan 2012
74. Loukides, G., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Malin, B.: Anonymization of electronic medical records for validating genome-wide association studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 7898–7903 (2010). doi:10.1073/pnas.0911686107
75. Yu, F., Rybar, M., Uhler, C., et al.: Differentially-private logistic regression for detecting multiple-SNP association in GWAS databases. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., (ed.) Privacy in Statistical Databases, 170–184. Springer, Cham (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87471-3
76. Wang, S., Mohammed, N., Chen, R.: Differentially private genome data dissemination through top-down specialization. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14, S2 (2014). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-S1-S2
77. Johnson, A., Shmatikov, V.: Privacy-preserving data exploration in genome-wide association studies. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery And Data Mining - KDD ’13,. 1079. ACM Press, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2487575.2487687
78. Uhler, C., Slavkovic, A.B., Fienberg, S.E.: Privacy-preserving data sharing for genome-wide association studies. J. Priv. Confidentiality 5, 137–166 (2013)
79. Yu, F., Fienberg, S.E., Slavkovic, A.B., et al.: Scalable privacy-preserving data sharing methodology for genome-wide association studies. J. Biomed. Inform. 50, 133–141 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.008
80. Yu, F., Ji, Z.: Scalable privacy-preserving data sharing methodology for genome-wide association studies: an application to iDASH healthcare privacy protection challenge. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14, S3 (2014). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-S1-S3
81. De Cristofaro, E.: Genomic privacy and the rise of a new research community. IEEE Secur. Priv. 12, 80–83 (2014). doi:10.1109/MSP.2014.24
82. II International Workshop on Genome Privacy and Security (GenoPri 2015). http://www.genopri.org/. Accessed 30 Mar 2015
83. Ohno-Machado, L., Bafna, V., Boxwala, A.A., et al.: iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 19, 196–201 (2012)
84. Jiang, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., et al.: A community assessment of privacy preserving techniques for human genomes. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14(Suppl 1), S1 (2014). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-S1-S1