Markovian modeling of seismic damage accumulation

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 441-461

  Iervolino, Iunio ^a   Giorgio, Massimiliano ^b   Chioccarelli, Eugenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Performance based earthquake engineering; Reliability; State dependent fragility; Stochastic process

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOPHYSICS; HAZARDS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; LIFE CYCLE; MARKOV PROCESSES; RANDOM PROCESSES; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOLOGY; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMAGED STRUCTURES; DEGRADATION PROCESS; HYSTERETIC RESPONSE; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS; SEISMIC RELIABILITY; STATE-DEPENDENT;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; MARKOV CHAIN; NUMERICAL MODEL; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STOCHASTICITY; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84956747543     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2668     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biondini F, Frangopol DM. Advances in life-cycle civil engineering. Struct. Infrastruct. E. 2014; 10(7):843.
2. Frangopol DM, Soliman M. Life-cycle of structural systems: recent achievements and future directions. Struct. Infrastruct. E. 2015; in press.
3. Li Q, Wang C, Ellingwood BR. Time-dependent reliability of aging structures in the presence of non-stationary loads and degradation. Struct. Saf. 2015; 52(PA):132-141.
4. Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Chioccarelli E. Gamma degradation models for earthquake-resistant structures. Struct. Saf. 2013; 45:48-58.
5. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. Peer Center Newsletter 2000; 3(2).
6. Sanchez-Silva M, Klutke G-A, Rosowsky DV. Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Struct. Saf. 2011; 33(3):206-217.
7. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences. Struct. Saf. 2009; 31(5):396-408.
8. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. In Fragility functions-Impact of repeated events with various intensities on the fragility functions for a given building typology at local scale. D4.1 of the MATRIX project (URL http://matrix.gpi.kit.edu/) 2012.
9. McGuire RK. Seismic hazard and risk analysis, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, MNO-10: Oakland, CA, US, 2004.
10. Giorgio M, Guida M, Pulcini G. A state-dependent wear model with an application to marine engine cylinder liners. Technometrics 2010; 52(2):172-187.
11. Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Chioccarelli E. Closed-form aftershock reliability of damage-cumulating elastic-perfectly-plastic systems. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 2014; 43(4):613-625.
12. Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Polidoro B. Reliability of structures to earthquake clusters. B. Earthq. Eng. 2015; 13(4):983-1002.
13. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Damage indices and damage measures. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mat. 2000; 2(1):50-59.
14. Park Y, Ang A. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng 1985; 111(4):722-739.
15. Ibarra L, Medina R, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 2005; 34(12):1489-1511.
16. Luco N, Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock. In the proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 13WCEE, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
17. Cesare M, Santamarina C, Turkstra C, Vanmarcke E. Modeling bridge deterioration with markov chains. J. Transp. Eng 1992; 118(6):820-833.
18. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthq. Spectra 2007; 23(2):357-392.
19. Iervolino I, Chioccarelli E, Convertito V. Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2011; 31(9):1212-1231.
20. Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G, Stucchi M, Basili R, Barba S, Vannucci G, Boschi E. A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 2008; 450(1-4):85-108.
21. Barani S, Spallarossa D, Bazzurro P. Disaggregation of probabilistic ground motion hazard in Italy. B. Seismol. Soc. Am 2009; 99(5):2638-2661.
22. Barani S, Spallarossa D, Bazzurro P. Erratum to disaggregation of probabilistic ground motion hazard in Italy. B. Seismol. Soc. Am 2010; 100(6):3335-3336.
23. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ. Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 1996; 25(4):371-400.
24. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering, PEER Report 2005/13, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
25. Giorgio M, Guida M, Pulcini G. An age- and state-dependent Markov model for degradation processes. IIE T 2011; 43(9):621-632.
26. Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Chioccarelli E. Age- and state-dependent seismic reliability of structures. In the proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12, Vancouver, Canada, 2015.