Gamma degradation models for earthquake-resistant structures

Structural Safety

Volumn 45, Issue , 2013, Pages 48-58

  Iervolino, Iunio ^a   Giorgio, Massimiliano ^b   Chioccarelli, Eugenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aging; Cumulative damage; Life cycle; Performance based earthquake engineering; Stochastic process

Indexed keywords

CLOSED FORM APPROXIMATIONS; CUMULATIVE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT STRUCTURES; EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENTS; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL PARAMETER;

AGING OF MATERIALS; DETERIORATION; LIFE CYCLE; RANDOM PROCESSES;

EARTHQUAKES;

EID: 84885993733     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cornell C.A., Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. Peer Center Newslett 2000, 3(2).
2. McGuire R.K. Seismic Hazard and risk analysis 2004, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, MNO-10, Oakland, CA, 178 pp.
3. Yeo G.L., Cornell C.A. Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences. Struct Saf 2009, 31(5):396-408.
4. Sanchez-Silva M., Klutke G.-A., Rosowsky D.V. Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Struct Saf 2011, 33(3):206-217.
5. Rao A, Lepech M, Kiremidjian A, Sun XY. Time varying risk modeling of deteriorating bridge infrastructure for sustainable infrastructure design. In: Frangopol DM, Sause R, Kusko CS, editors. Bridge maintenance, safety, management, and life-cycle optimization. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS), Philadelphia, PA; 2010.
6. Stewart M.G., Wang X., Nguyen M.N. Climate change impact and risks of concrete infrastructure deterioration. Eng Struct 2011, 33(4):1326-1337.
7. Frangopol D.M., Kallen M.-J., van Noortwijk J.M. Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Prog Struct Eng Mater 2004, 6(4):197-212.
8. Ellingwood B., Mori Y. Reliability-based service life assessment of concrete structures in nuclear power plants: optimum inspection and repair. Nucl Eng Des 1997, 175(3):247-258.
9. Pandey MD, van Noortwijk JM. Gamma process model for time-dependent structural reliability analysis. In: Watanabe E, Frangopol DM, Utsonomiya T, editors. Bridge maintenance, safety, management and cost. Proceedings of the second international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS), Kyoto, Japan; 2004.
10. Gutenberg R., Richter C.F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 1944, 34(4):185-188.
11. Çinlar E. On a generalization of gamma processes. J Appl Prob 1980, 17(2):467-480.
12. Cosenza E., Manfredi G. Damage indices and damage measures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 2000, 2(1):50-59.
13. Luco N., Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock 2004, Paper No. 2405.
14. Giorgio M., Guida M., Pulcini G. An age- and state-dependent Markov model for degradation processes. IIE Trans 2011, 43(9):621-632.
15. Giorgio M., Guida M., Pulcini G. A state-dependent wear model with an application to marine engine cylinder liners. Technometrics 2010, 52(2):172-187.
16. Oehlert G.W. A note on the delta method. Am Stat 1992, 46(1):27-29.
17. Van Noortwijk J.M., van der Weide J.A.M., Kallen M.J., Pandey M.D. Gamma processes and peaks-over-threshold distributions for time-dependent reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2007, 92(12):1651-1658.
18. Vamvatsikos D., Dolsek M. Equivalent constant rates for performance-based assessment of aging structures. Struct Saf 2011, 33(1):8-18.
19. Johnson N.L., Kotz S. Continuous univariate distributions, 1 and 2 1970, Wiley, New York.
20. Kijima M. Some results for repairable systems with general repair. J Appl Prob 1989, 26(1):89-102.
21. Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Chioccarelli E. Closed-form aftershock reliability of damage-cumulating elastic-perfectly-plastic systems. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn; 2013.[in press]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2363.
22. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA 356. Washington, DC; 2000.
23. Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. In impact of repeated events with various intensities on the fragility functions for a given building typology at local scale. D4.1 of the MATRIX project, 2012. http://matrix.gpi.kit.edu.
24. Iervolino I., Galasso C., Cosenza E. REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng 2010, 8(2):339-362.
25. CEN, European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, Part 1.1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Pren1998-1; 2003.
26. Iervolino I., Chioccarelli E., Convertito V. Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 2011, 31(9):1212-1231.