Data collection and use in research funding and performing organisations. General outlines and first results of a project launched by Science Europe

Scientometrics

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 825-835

  Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a   Beck, Raphael ^b   Milzow, Katrin ^c   Slipersæter, Stig ^d   Tóth, Gábor ^e   Kołodziejski, Michał ^f   Chi, Pei Shan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^c Schweizerische Nationalfonds SNF   (Switzerland)

^d Norges forskningsrad   (Norway)

^e Hungarian Scientifi c Research Fund (OTKA)   (Hungary)

^f National Science Centre (NCN)   (Poland)

Author keywords

Classification system; Data collection; Data standardisation; Researcher identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956708733     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1815-z     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Glänzel, W. (1996). The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics,35(2), 167–176.
2. Glänzel, W. (2015). The challenge of data collection, harmonisation and standardisation for use in research funding, output measurement and research assessment. Paper presented at the special session on “New frontiers and empirical evidence on the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Impact of Education, Research and Innovation” organised by C. Daraio at the 15th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI 2015), Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
3. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature,520, 429–431.
4. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal,314(7079), 498–502.
5. Wouters, P., Glänzel, W., Gläser, J., & Rafols, I. (2013). The dilemmas of performance indicators of individual researchers—An urgent debate in bibliometrics. ISSI Newsletter,9(3), 48–53.