Product sound design: Form, function, and experience

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 07-09-October-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Erkut, Cumhur ^a   Serafin, Stefania ^a   Hoby, Michael ^b   Sarde, Jonniy ^c  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b GN Hearing A S   (Denmark)

^c Audiowise   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Auditory Feedback; Pedagogy; Sonic Interaction Design

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PRODUCT DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS; APPLICATION SCENARIO; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS; PEDAGOGY; PORTABLE ENTERTAINMENT; SONIC INTERACTION DESIGN;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 84956680623     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2814895.2814920     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Alves, V.N.N. and Roque, L. 2010. A pattern language for sound design in games. Proc. Audio Mostly (Pite?, Sweden, Sep. 2010), 12-8.
2. Bech, S. and Zacharov, N. 2006. Perceptual Audio Evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
3. Blauert, J. and Jekosch, U. 1997. Sound-Quality Evaluation A Multi-Layered Problem. Acta Acustica. 83, 3 (1997), 747-753.
4. Bødker, S. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proc. NordiCHI (Oslo, Norway, Oct. 2006), 1-8.
5. Caramiaux, B., Altavilla, A., Pobiner, S.G. and Tanaka, A. 2015. Form Follows Sound: Designing Interactions from Sonic Memories. Proc. CHI (Seoul, Republic of Korea, Apr. 2015), 3943-3952.
6. Carron, M., Dubois, F., Misdariis, N., Talotte, C. and Susini, P. 2014. Designing sound identity. Proc. Audio Mostly (Aalborg, Denmark, 2014), 1-8.
7. Delle Monache, S., Polotti, P. and Rocchesso, D. 2010. A toolkit for explorations in sonic interaction design. Proc. Audio Mostly (Pite?, Sweden, Sep. 2010), 7-13.
8. Desmet, P. and Hekkert, P. 2007. Framework of Product Experience. International Journal of Design. 1, 1 (2007), 57-66.
9. Ekman, I. and Rinott, M. 2010. Using Vocal Sketching for Designing Sonic Interactions. Proc. DIS (Aarhus, Denmark, 2010), 123-131.
10. Erkut, C. and Rajala-Erkut, A. 2015. Beyond Command & Control: Sketching Embodied Interaction. Proc. CHI EA (Seoul, Republic of Korea, Apr. 2015)
11. Franinovic, K. and Salter, C.L. 2013. The Experience of Sonic Interaction. In Sonic Interaction Design. K. Franinovic and S. Serafin, eds. MIT Press. 39-76.
12. Franinovic, K., Hug, D. and Visell, Y. 2007. Sound Embodied: Explorations of sonic interaction design for everyday objects in a workshop setting. Proc. ICAD, (Montreal, Canada, 2007), 334-341.
13. Harrison, S., Back, M.J. and Tatar, D. 2006. It's Just a Method!: a pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design. Proc. DIS (, USA, Jun. 2006), 261-270.
14. Hassenzahl, M. 2010. Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
15. Houix, O., Misdariis, N., Susini, P., Bevilacqua, F. and Gutierrez, F. 2013. Sonically Augmented Artifacts: Design Methodology Through Participatory Workshops. Sound, Music, and Motion. M. Aramaki, O. Derrien, R. Kronland- Martinet, and S. Ystad, eds. Springer International Publishing. 20-40.
16. Hug, D. and Kemper, M. 2014. From Foley to Function: a Pedagogical Approach to Sound Design for Novel Interactions. Journal of Sonic Studies. 6, 1 (Jan. 2014).
17. Hug, D. and Misdariis, N. 2011. Towards a conceptual framework to integrate designerly and scientific sound design methods. Proc. Audio Mostly (Coimbra, Portugal, Sep. 2011), 1-8.
18. Jansen, R.J., ?zcan, E. and van Egmond, R. 2011. PSST! Product Sound Sketching Tool. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 59, 6 (2011), 396-403.
19. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 2011. Metaphors We Live By. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction. Pine Forge Press, 103-114.
20. Lenz, E., Diefenbach, S., Hassenzahl, M. and Lienhard, S. 2012. Mo. shared music, shared moment. Proc. NordiCHI (Copenhagen, Denmark, Oct. 2012), 736-741.
21. Luhtala, M., Turunen, M., Hakulinen, J. and Keskinen, T. 2013. "AIE-studio" - a pragmatist aesthetic approach for procedural sound design. Proc. Audio Mostly (Pitea, Sweden, Sep. 2013), Article #7.
22. Nordahl, R. and Serafin, S. 2008. Using problem based learning to support transdisciplinarity in an HCI education. Proc. HCIed (2008), 99-106.
23. Pacione, C. 2010. Evolution of the mind. interactions. ACM.
24. Pirhonen, A. 2014. Metaphor as a focal concept in sound design. Proc. Audio Mostly (Aalborg, Denmark, Oct. 2014).
25. Pirhonen, A., Brewster, S.A. and Holguin, C. 2002. Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002).
26. Rocchesso, D., Polotti, P. and Delle Monache, S. 2009. Designing Continuous Sonic Interaction. International Journal of Design. 3, 3 (May 2009), 13-25.
27. Serafin, S., Franinovic, K., Hermann, T., Lemaitre, G., Rinott, M. and Rocchesso, D. 2011. Sonic Interaction Design. The Sonification Handbook. T. Hermann, A. Hunt, and J.G. Neuhoff, eds. Logos Publishing House. 87-110.
28. Spence, C. and Zampini, M. 2006. Auditory Contributions to Multisensory Product Perception. Acta Acustica. 92, (2006), 1009-1025.
29. Susini, P., Houix, O. and Misdariis, N. 2014. Sound design: an applied, experimental framework to study the perception of everyday sounds. The New Soundtrack. 4, 2 (Sep. 2014), 103-121.
30. Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S.D. 2008. Product design and development. McGraw-Hill.