Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 45-60

  Land Zandstra, Anne M ^a   Devilee, Jeroen L A ^b   Snik, Frans ^a   Buurmeijer, Franka ^c   Van Den Broek, Jos M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c Dutch Research School for Astronomy (NOVA)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acquisition of new technologies; Health and new technologies; Public participation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE; SMARTPHONE; TRENDS; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SMARTPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84956674889     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662515602406     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Batson CD, Ahmad N and Tsang JA (2002) Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues 58(3): 429-445
2. Bonney R, Ballard H, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, et al. (2009a) Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, DC, July.
3. Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, et al. (2009b) Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59(11): 977-984
4. Brossard D, Lewenstein B and Bonney R (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education 27(9): 1099-1121
5. Catlin-Groves CL (2012) The citizen science landscape: From volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology 2012: 1-14
6. Chu M, Leonard P and Stevenson F (2012) Growing the base for citizen science: Recruiting and engaging participants. In: Dickinson JL and Bonney R (eds) Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 69-81
7. Cook C, Heath F and Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60(6): 821-836
8. Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, Beenen M, et al. (2010) Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466: 756-760
9. Crall AW, Jordan R, Holfelder K, Newman GJ, Graham J and Waller DM (2012) The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science 22(6): 745-764
10. Cronje R, Rohlinger S, Crall A and Newman G (2011) Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 10(3): 135-145
11. Devictor V, Whittaker RJ and Beltrame C (2010) Beyond scarcity: Citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 16(3): 354-362
12. Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, et al. (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 291-297
13. Druschke CG and Seltzer CE (2012) Failures of engagement: Lessons learned from a citizen science pilot study. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 11(3-4): 178-188
14. Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R, Roux K, Salmonsen L and Marra PP (2005) The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology 19(3): 589-594
15. Haklay M (2012) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui DZ, Elwood S and Goodchild MF (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer, pp. 105-122
16. Jennett C, Furniss DJ, Iacovides I, Wiseman S, Gould SJJ and Cox AL (2014) Exploring citizen psychscience and the motivations of Errordiary volunteers. Human Computation 1(2): 199-218
17. Jennett C, Kloetzer L, Gold M and Cox AL (2013) Sociability in virtual citizen science. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013 workshop on designing and evaluating sociability in online video games, Paris, 27 April, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 29-32
18. Jordan RC, Gray SA, Howe DV, Brooks WR and Ehrenfeld JG (2011) Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conservation Biology 25(6): 1148-1154
19. Lee S and Roth W (2003) Science and the ‘good citizen’: Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology & Human Values 28(3): 403-424
20. Mueller M, Tippins D and Bryan L (2012) The future of citizen science. Democracy & Education 20(1): 1-12
21. National Research Council (2009) Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22. Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S and Crowston K (2012) The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 298-304
23. Nov O, Arazy O and Anderson D (2011a) Dusting for science: Motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle, WA, 8-11 February, pp. 68-74 New York, NY: ACM.
24. Nov O, Arazy O and Anderson D (2011b) Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. In: Proceedings of the AAAI international conference on weblogs and social media, Barcelona, Spain, 17-21 July, pp. 249-256Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
25. Price CA and Lee H-S (2013) Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (7): 773-801
26. Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Cardamone C, Murray P, et al. (2013) Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1). DOI: 10.3847/AER2011021
27. Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Murray P, Szalay AS, et al. (2010) Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9(1). DOI: 10.3847/AER2009036
28. Reed J, Raddick MJ, Lardner A and Carney K (2013) An exploratory factor analysis of motivations for participating in Zooniverse, a collection of virtual citizen science projects. In: Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Wailea, HI, 7-10 January, pp. 610-619 Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
29. Riesch H and Potter C (2014) Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 107-120
30. Riesch H, Potter C and Davies L (2013) Combining citizen science and public engagement: The Open Air Laboratories Programme. Journal of Science Communication, 12(3). Available at: http://jcom.sissa.it/ sites/default/files/documents/JCOM1203(2013)A03.pdf
31. Rotman D, Preece J, Hammock J, Procita K, Hansen D, Lewis D, et al. (2012) Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, WA, 11-15 February, pp. 217-226 New York, NY: ACM.
32. Roy HE, Pocock MJO, Preston CD, Roy DB, Savage J, Tweddle JC, et al. (2012) Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
33. Sauermann H and Franzoni C (2015) Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 679-684
34. Science Communication Unit, University of the West of England-Bristol (2013) Science for environmental policy in-depth report: Environmental citizen science. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment, December. Bristol, UK
35. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(9): 467-471
36. Snik F, Rietjens JHH, Apituley A, Volten H, Mijling B, Di Noia A, et al. (2014) Mapping atmospheric aerosols with a citizen science network of smartphone spectropolarimeters. Geophysical Research Letters 41(20): 7351-7358
37. Socientize (2013) Citizen Science for Europe: Towards a Better Society of Empowered Citizens and Enhanced Research (Green paper on citizen science). The Socientize consortium. Available at: www.socientize.eu
38. Sullivan BL, Wood CL, Iliff MJ, Bonney RE, Fink D and Kelling S (2009) eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 142 (10): 2282-2292
39. Theobald EJ, Ettinger AK, Burgess HK, DeBey LB, Schmidt NR, Froehlich H, et al. (2015) Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation 181: 236-244
40. Thompson S and Bonney R (2007) Evaluating the impact of participation in an online citizen science project: A mixed-methods approach. In: Trant J and Bearman D (eds) Museums and the Web 2007: Proceedings. Toronto, ON, Canada: Archives & Museum Informatics. Available at: http://www.archimuse.com/ mw2007/papers/thompson/thompson.html
41. Trumbull DJ, Bonney R, Bascom D and Cabral A (2000) Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education 84(2): 265-275
42. Wiggins A and Crowston K (2012) Describing public participation in scientific research. In: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7-10 February. New York, NY: ACM.
43. Wymer WW (2003) Differentiating literacy volunteers: A segmentation analysis for target marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8(3): 267-285.