Semi-automated hippocampal segmentation in people with cognitive impairment using an age appropriate template for registration

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1631-1638

  Merkel, Bernd ^a,b   Steward, Christopher ^a,b   Vivash, Lucy ^a   Malpas, Charles B ^c   Phal, Pramit ^a,b   Moffat, Bradford A ^a   Cox, Kay L ^d   Ellis, Kathryn A ^a   Ames, David J ^a,e   Cyarto, Elizabeth V ^e   Lai, Michelle M Y ^e   Sharman, Matthew J ^f   Szoeke, Cassandra ^a   Masters, Colin L ^a   Lautenschlager, Nicola T ^a,g   Desmond, Patricia ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e NATIONAL AGEING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alzheimer's disease; hippocampus; magnetic resonance imaging; mild cognitive impairment; segmentation; subjective memory complaints

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN SIZE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROANATOMICAL TRACT TRACING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SEMI AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION METHOD; SUBJECTIVE MEMORY COMPLAINT; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

AGED; AGING; COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84955693610     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24966     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. WHO, Alzheimer's Disease International. Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: WHO; 2012. p 112.
2. Petersen RC,. Mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2227-2234.
3. Jonker C, Geerlings MI, Schmand B,. Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15: 983-991.
4. Stewart R,. Subjective cognitive impairment. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012; 25: 445-450.
5. Frankõ E, Joly O,; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Evaluating Alzheimer's disease progression using rate of regional hippocampal atrophy. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71354.
6. Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, et al., Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15: 1676-1689.
7. Bozzali M, Filippi M, Magnani G, et al., The contribution of voxel-based morphometry in staging patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2006; 67: 453-460.
8. Agosta F, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al., Sensorimotor network rewiring in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 515-525.
9. Schuff N, Zhu XP,. Imaging of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: S109-S114.
10. Jack CR Jr, Barkhof F, Bernstein MA, et al., Steps to standardization and validation of hippocampal volumetry as a biomarker in clinical trials and diagnostic criterion for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 474-485.e4.
11. Fischl B,. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 774-781.
12. Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M,. A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 2011; 56: 907-922.
13. Shen L, Saykin AJ, Kim S, et al., Comparison of manual and automated determination of hippocampal volumes in MCI and early AD. Brain Imaging Behav 2010; 4: 86-95.
14. Wenger E, Martensson J, Noack H, et al., Comparing manual and automatic segmentation of hippocampal volumes: reliability and validity issues in younger and older brains. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 4236-4248.
15. Sanchez-Benavides G, Gomez-Anson B, Sainz A, Vives Y, Delfino M, Pena-Casanova J,. Manual validation of FreeSurfer's automated hippocampal segmentation in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer Disease subjects. Psychiatry Res 2010; 181: 219-225.
16. Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ, Reglade-Meslin C, Sachdev PS,. In vivo hippocampal measurement and memory: a comparison of manual tracing and automated segmentation in a large community-based sample. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5265.
17. Morey RA, Petty CM, Xu Y, et al., A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes. Neuroimage 2009; 45: 855-866.
18. Lehmann M, Douiri A, Kim LG, et al., Atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a comparison of FreeSurfer and manual volumetric measurements. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 2264-2274.
19. Avants BB, Yushkevich P, Pluta J, et al., The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 2457-2466.
20. Akhondi-Asl A, Jafari-Khouzani K, Elisevich K, Soltanian-Zadeh H,. Hippocampal volumetry for lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy: automated versus manual methods. Neuroimage 2011; 54 (Suppl 1): S218-S226.
21. Chakravarty MM, Steadman P, van Eede MC, et al., Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34: 2635-2654.
22. Pipitone J, Park MTM, Winterburn J, et al., Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage 2014; 101: 494-512.
23. Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D, et al., The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr 2009; 21: 672-687.
24. Cyarto EV, Lautenschlager NT, Desmond PM, et al., Protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of physical activity on delaying the progression of white matter changes on MRI in older adults with memory complaints and mild cognitive impairment: The AIBL Active trial. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12.
25. Cook MJ, Fish DR, Shorvon SD, Straughan K, Stevens JM,. Hippocampal volumetric and morphometric studies in frontal and temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 1992; 115: 1001-1015.
26. Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E,. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 1-15.
27. Buckner RL, Head D, Parker J, et al., A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 724-738.
28. Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC,. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 2008; 12: 26-41.
29. Avants B, Gee JC,. Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation. Neuroimage 2004; 23 (Suppl 1): S139-S150.
30. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, et al., Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 786-802.
31. Chen PY, Popovich PM,. Correlation-parametric and nonparametric measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2002. 104 p.
32. Zhang YJ, Zhang JY, Hsu J, et al., Evaluation of group-specific, whole-brain atlas generation using Volume-based Template Estimation (VTE): application to normal and Alzheimer's populations. Neuroimage 2014; 84: 406-419.
33. Barnes J, Whitwell JL, Frost C, Josephs KA, Rossor M, Fox NC,. Measurements of the amygdala and hippocampus in pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Arch Neurol 2006; 63: 1434-1439.
34. Marcus DS, Wang TH, Parker J, Csernansky JG, Morris JC, Buckner RL,. Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 1498-1507.
35. Bergouignan L, Chupin M, Czechowska Y, et al., Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression? Neuroimage 2009; 45: 29-37.
36. Adler DH, Pluta J, Kadivar S, et al., Histology-derived volumetric annotation of the human hippocampal subfields in postmortem MRI. Neuroimage 2014; 84: 505-523.
37. Carmichael OT, Aizenstein HA, Davis SW, et al., Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 2005; 27: 979-990.
38. Shen DG, Davatzikos C,. HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21: 1421-1439.
39. Chupin M, Mukuna-Bantumbakulu AR, Hasboun D, et al., Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2007; 34: 996-1019.