Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1656-1665

  Barentsz, Maarten W ^a   Taviani, Valentina ^b   Chang, Jung M ^c   Ikeda, Debra M ^b   Miyake, Kanae K ^d   Banerjee, Suchandrima ^e   Van Den Bosch, Maurice A A J ^a   Hargreaves, Brian A ^b   Daniel, Bruce L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; diffusion weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; tumor morphology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TUMOR VOLUME; ALGORITHM; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CELL SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING PHANTOM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL SIZE; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84955641832     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24929     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E,. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
2. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al., Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211: 101-110.
3. Yang L, Krefting I, Gorovets A, et al., Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and class labeling of gadolinium-based contrast agents by the Food and Drug Administration. Radiology 2012; 265: 248-253.
4. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al., In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 693-704.
5. Mansfield P,. Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State Phys 1977; 10: L55-58.
6. Turner R, Lebihan D,. Single-shot diffusion imaging at 2.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 86: 445-452.
7. Bammer R, Auer M, Keeling SL, et al., Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 128-136.
8. Jeong EK, Kim SE, Guo J, et al., High-resolution DTI with 2D interleaved multislice reduced FOV single-shot diffusion-weighted EPI (2D ss-rFOV-DWEPI). Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1575-1579.
9. Wilm BJ, Svensson J, Henning A, et al., Reduced field-of-view MRI using outer volume suppression for spinal cord diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 625-630.
10. Saritas EU, Cunningham CH, Lee JH, et al., DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 468-473.
11. Zaharchuk G, Saritas EU, Andre JB, et al., Reduced field-of-view diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 813-820.
12. Reischauer C, Wilm BJ, Froehlich JM, et al., High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer using a reduced FOV technique. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: e34-41.
13. Singer L, Wilmes LJ, Saritas EU, et al., High-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2012; 19: 526-534.
14. Wilmes LJ, McLaughlin RL, Newitt DC, et al., High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response. Acad Radiol 2013; 20: 581-589.
15. Keenan KE, Aliu SO, Wilmes LJ, et al., Universal Breast Phantom for Quantitative MRI. In: Proc 22nd Annual Meeting ISMRM, Milan; 2014 (abstract 1047).
16. Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ,. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 177-182.
17. Saranathan M, Rettmann DW, Hargreaves BA, et al., Differential subsampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO): a high spatio-temporal resolution Dixon imaging sequence for multiphasic contrast enhanced abdominal imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35: 1484-1492.
18. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O,. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17: 205-216.
19. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Morris EA, et al., Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system-magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI). American College of Radiology (ACR) Reston, VA; 2003.
20. Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al., Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 96-106.
21. Peters NH, Vincken KL, van den Bosch MA, et al., Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 1100-1105.
22. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, et al., Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 319-324.
23. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al., Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178.
24. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al., Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7: 23-29.
25. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, et al., Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2646-2655.
26. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, et al., ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005; 4: 35-42.
27. Clark CA, Le Bihan D,. Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 852-859.
28. Kang BJ, Lipson JA, Planey KR, et al., Rim sign in breast lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
29. Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, et al., Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 861-867.
30. Warren RM, Bobrow LG, Earl HM, et al., Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 1349-1360.
31. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, et al., Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 110-119.