Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: The influence of the choice of b-values

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1100-1105

  Peters, Nicky H G M ^a   Vincken, Koen L ^b   Van Den Bosch, Maurice A A J ^a   Luijten, Peter R ^b   Mali, Willem P Th M ^a   Bartels, Lambertus W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast; Cancer; DWI; High field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST LESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951552348     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22152     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233: 830-849.
2. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004;292:2735-2742. (Pubitemid 39628252)
3. Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Perbeck L, Bone B. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. Acta Radiol 2002; 43:275-281. (Pubitemid 34729521)
4. Agoston AT, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, et al. Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data. Radiographics 2001;21:217-226.
5. Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O'Hea B, Button TM. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 2004;232:585-591. (Pubitemid 38971303)
6. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:319-324. (Pubitemid 44188557)
7. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:172-178. (Pubitemid 34810055)
8. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:693-704.
9. Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Funatu H, Fukuma E, Narita M. Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:1042-1046. (Pubitemid 36076728)
10. Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004;3:79-85.
11. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:23-29.
12. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2646-2655.
13. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005;4: 35-42.
14. Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:63-69.
15. Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1077-1083. (Pubitemid 47260686)
16. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:889-895. (Pubitemid 32479947)
17. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000;10:46-58.
18. Ducatman BS, Emery ST, Wang HH. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Mod Pathol 1993;6:539-543.
19. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497-505.
20. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Boesch C, Hermans R. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the parotid gland: influence of the choice of b-values on the apparent diffusion coefficient value. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:786-790. (Pubitemid 39426073)
21. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 2006;239: 666-676. (Pubitemid 43830601)
22. Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M, et al. Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 2008;26:15-20. (Pubitemid 351928143)