Prognostic imaging biomarkers in glioblastoma: Development and independent validation on the basis of multiregion and quantitative analysis of MR images

Radiology

Volumn 278, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 546-553

  Cui, Yi ^a   Tha, Khin Khin ^b   Terasaka, Shunsuke ^a   Yamaguchi, Shigeru ^a   Wang, Jeff ^b   Kudo, Kohsuke ^c   Xing, Lei ^a   Shirato, Hiroki ^a,b   Li, Ruijiang ^a,d  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CHILD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; VALIDATION STUDY; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; VERY ELDERLY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; TUMOR MARKER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84955617987     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150358     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2007;114(2):97-109.
2. Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro-oncol 2012;14(Suppl 5):v1-v49.
3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352(10):987-996.
4. Bonavia R, Inda MM, Cavenee WK, Furnari FB. Heterogeneity maintenance in glioblastoma: A social network. Cancer Res 2011; 71(12):4055-4060.
5. Sottoriva A, Spiteri I, Piccirillo SG, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110(10):4009-4014.
6. Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 2014;344(6190):1396-1401.
7. Pope WB, Sayre J, Perlina A, Villablanca JP, Mischel PS, Cloughesy TF. MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26(10):2466-2474.
8. Jain R, Poisson L, Narang J, et al. Genomic mapping and survival prediction in glioblastoma: molecular subclassification strengthened by hemodynamic imaging biomarkers. Radiology 2013;267(1):212-220.
9. Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L, et al. Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(24):3838-3843.
10. Hammoud MA, Sawaya R, Shi W, Thall PF, Leeds NE. Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 1996;27(1):65-73.
11. Gutman DA, Cooper LA, Hwang SN, et al. MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology 2013;267(2):560-569.
12. Gevaert O, Mitchell LA, Achrol AS, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. Radiology 2014;273(1):168-174.
13. Zinn PO, Mahajan B, Sathyan P, et al. Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 2011;6(10):e25451.
14. Zinn PO, Sathyan P, Mahajan B, et al. A novel volume-age-KPS (VAK) glioblastoma classification identifies a prognostic cognate microRNA-gene signature. PLoS One 2012; 7(8):e41522.
15. Zhou M, Hall L, Goldgof D, et al. Radiologically defined ecological dynamics and clinical outcomes in glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results. Transl Oncol 2014;7(1):5-13.
16. Caulo M, Panara V, Tortora D, et al. Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: A multiparametric MR imaging study. Radiology 2014;272(2):494-503.
17. O'Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A. Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(2):249-257.
18. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, et al. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 2013;26(6):1045-1057.
19. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. Elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29(1):196-205.
20. Maubon AJ, Ferru JM, Berger V, et al. Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. RadioGraphics 1999;19(4):1057-1067.
21. Hamamci A, Kucuk N, Karaman K, Engin K, Unal G. Tumor-cut: segmentation of brain tumors on contrast enhanced MR images for radiosurgery applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31(3):790-804.
22. Menze B, Reyes M, Van Leemput K. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014 Dec 4. [Epub ahead of print]
23. Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945;26(3):297-302.
24. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectationmaximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(1):45-57.
25. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973;SMC-3(6):610-621.
26. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420-428.
27. Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med 1997;16(4):385-395.
28. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
29. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001; 95(2):190-198.
30. Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi H, Terasaka S, et al. The impact of extent of resection and histological subtype on the outcome of adult patients with high-grade gliomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012;42(4):270-277.
31. Gatenby RA, Grove O, Gillies RJ. Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology. Radiology 2013;269(1):8-15.
32. Akbari H, Macyszyn L, Da X, et al. Pattern analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrastenhanced MR imaging demonstrates peritumoral tissue heterogeneity. Radiology 2014; 273(2):502-510.