Effect of homogenization (microfluidization) process parameters in mechanical production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose on its rheological and morphological properties

Cellulose

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 1221-1238

  Taheri, Hesam ^a   Samyn, Pieter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Creep; Microfibrillated cellulose; Morphology; Processing; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; CREEP; MORPHOLOGY; NANOCELLULOSE; PROCESSING; VISCOSITY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

MECHANICAL PRODUCTION; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (MFC); NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NEGATIVE ZETA POTENTIALS; PROCESSING CONDITION; RHEOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTY; YIELD STRESS BEHAVIOR;

YIELD STRESS;

EID: 84955605821     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0866-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abdul Khalil APS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979
2. Adebajo MO, Frost RL (2004) Infrared and 13C MAS nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopis study of acetylation of cotton. Spectrochim Acta A 60:449–453
3. Barnes HA (1999) The yield stress: a review or ‘πανταρει’—everything flows? J Non Newtonian Fluid Mech 81:133–178
4. Barnes HA (2000) A handbook of elementary rheology. Institute of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics Wales, University of Wales, Aberystwyth
5. Barry BW (1983) Rheology of dermatological vehicles. Marcel Dekker, New York
6. Benhamoua K, Dufresne A, Magninc A, Mortha G, Kaddami H (2013) Control of size and viscoelastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from palm tree by varying the TEMPO-mediated oxidation time. Carbohydr Polym 99:74–83
7. Björkman U (2003) Break-up of suspended fibre networks. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 18:32–37
8. Bröckel U, Meier W, Wagner G (2013) Product design and engineering: formulation of gels and pastes. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Heidelberg
9. Charani PR, Firouzabadi MD, Afra E, Shakeri A (2013) Rheological characterization of high concentrated MFC gel from kenaf unbleached pulp. Cellulose 20:727–740
10. Chen P, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang X, Ouyang M (2013) Concentration effects on the isolation and dynamic rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers via ultrasonic processing. Cellulose 20:149–157
11. Derakhshandeh B, Hatzikiriakos SG, Bennington CPJ (2010) The apparent yield stress of pulp fiber suspensions. J Rheol 54:1137–1154
12. Dinand E, Chanzy H, Vignon M (1996) Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose 3:183–188
13. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896
14. Henn AR, Fraundorf PB (1990) A quantitative measure of the degree of fibrillation of short reinforcing fibres. J Mater Sci 25:659–3663
15. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813
16. Hill RJ (2008) Elastic modulus of microfibrillar cellulose gels. Biomacromolecules 9:2963–2966
17. Hubbe MA (2007) Flocculation and redispersion of cellulosic fiber suspension: a review of effects of hydrodynamic shear and polyelectrolyte. Bioresources 2:296–331
18. Iotti M, Gregersen Ø, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–145
19. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 89:461–466
20. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9:1022–1026
21. Janardhnan S, Sain M (2011) Targeted disruption of Hydroxyl chemistry and crystallinity in natural fibers for the isolation of cellulose nano-fibers via enzymatic treatment. Bioresources 6:1242–1245
22. Kacuralova M, Capek P, Sasinklova V, Wellner N, Ebringerova A (2000) FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds: pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohydr Polym 43:195–203
23. Karande VS, Bharimalla AK, Hadge GB, Mhaske ST, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Nanofibrillation of cotton fibers by disc refiner and its characterization. Fibers Polym 12:399–404
24. Karppinen A, Vesterinen AH, Saarinen T, Pietikäinen P, Seppälä J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18:1381–1390
25. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19:1807–1819
26. Kataoka Y, Kondo T (1998) FTIR microscopic analysis of changing cellulose crystalline structure during wood cell wall formation. Macromolec 31:760–764
27. Kondo T (1997) The assignment of IR absorption bands due to free hydroxyl groups in cellulose. Cellulose 4:281–292
28. Kondo T, Togawa E, Brown RM (2001) Nematic ordered cellulose: a concept of glucan chain association. Biomacromolecules 2:1324–1330
29. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15:425–433
30. Li MC, Wu Q, Song K, Lee S, Qing Y, Wu Y (2015) Cellulose nanoparticles: structure–morphology–rheology relationships. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng 3:821–832
31. Lowys MP, Desbrières J, Rinaudo M (2001) Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocoll 15:25–32
32. Masalova I, Malkin AY, Foudazi R (2008) Yield stress of emulsions and suspensions as measured in steady shearing and in oscillations. Appl Rheol 18:44790–1–44790-8
33. Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2009) Current trends in suspension rheology. J Non Newton Fluid Mech 157:147–150
34. Missoum K, Belgacem N, Krouit M, Martin C, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J (2010) Influence of fibrillation degree and surface grafting of microfibrillated cellulose on their rheological behavior in aqueous suspension. In: TAPPI Nanotechnology conference for the forest product industry
35. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994
36. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohydr Polym 112:432–439
37. Nelson ML, O’Connor RL (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal latticed type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1311–1324
38. Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Seo G (2005) FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res 340:417–428
39. Ono H, Shimaya Y, Sato K, Hongo T (2004) 1H spin–spin relaxation time of water and rheological properties of cellulose nanofiber dispersion, transparent cellulose hydrogel (TCG). Polym J 36:684–694
40. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Bio-macromolecules 8:1934–1941
41. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behavior. Cellulose 19(3):647–659
42. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691
43. Salmén L, Åkertholm M, Hinterstoisser B (2005) Polyssaccharides: structural diversity and functional versatility. New York, USA
44. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794
45. Shogrena RL, Peterson SC, Evans KO, Kenar JA (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose gels from corn cobs. Carbohydr Polym 86:1351–1357
46. Taheri H, Samyn P (2015) Rheological properties and processing of polymer blends with micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose. In: Hakeem KR, Jawaid M, Alothman OY (eds) Agricultural biomass based potential materials. Springer, Switzerland, pp 259–291
47. Tatsumi D, Ishioka S, Matsumoto T (2002) Effect of fiber concentration and axial ratio on the rheological properties of cellulose fiber suspensions. J Soc Rheol Jpn 30:27–32