Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement: Accuracy of t1 mapping-based synthetic inversion-recovery imaging

Radiology

Volumn 278, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 374-382

  Varga Szemes, Akos ^a   Van Der Geest, Rob J ^b   Spottiswoode, Bruce S ^c   Suranyi, Pal ^a   Ruzsics, Balazs ^d   De Cecco, Carlo N ^a   Muscogiuri, Giuseppe ^a,e   Cannaò, Paola M ^a,f   Fox, Mary A ^a   Wichmann, Julian L ^a,g   Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn ^a,h   Schoepf, U Joseph ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^d ROYAL LIVERPOOL AND BROADGREEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBENIC ACID; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVENTIONAL MAGNITUDE RECONSTRUCTED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; CONVENTIONAL PHASE SENSITIVE RECONSTRUCTED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNTHETIC MAGNITUDE RECONSTRUCTED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; SYNTHETIC PHASE SENSITIVE INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84955560345     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150162     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 1996;94(12):3318-3326.
2. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002;47(2):372-383.
3. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5(3):505-514.
4. Elgeti T, Abdel-Aty H, Wagner M, et al. Assessment of late gadolinium enhancement in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: comparison of a fast phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence (PSIR) and a conventional segmented 2D gradient echo recall (GRE) sequence-preliminary findings. Invest Radiol 2007;42(10):671-675.
5. Kellman P, Hansen MS. T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:2.
6. Kellman P, Herzka DA, Hansen MS. Adiabatic inversion pulses for myocardial T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(4):1428-1434.
7. Xue H, Shah S, Greiser A, et al. Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic image estimation. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(6):1644-1655.
8. Xue H, Greiser A, Zuehlsdorff S, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for myocardial T1 mapping with motion correction and parametric fitting. Magn Reson Med 2013;69(5):1408-1420.
9. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542.
10. Bondarenko O, Beek AM, Hofman MBM, et al. Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7(2):481-485.
11. Heiberg E, Ugander M, Engblom H, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study. Radiology 2008;246(2):581-588.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-310.
13. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100(19):1992-2002.
14. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;106(9):1083-1089.
15. Beek AM, Kühl HP, Bondarenko O, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(5):895-901.
16. Schuleri KH, Centola M, George RT, et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1699-1707.
17. Varga-Szemes A, Simor T, Lenkey Z, et al. Infarct density distribution by MRI in the porcine model of acute and chronic myocardial infarction as a potential method transferable to the clinic. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;30(5):937-948.
18. Radunski UK, Lund GK, Stehning C, et al. CMR in patients with severe myocarditis: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers including extracellular volume imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7(7):667-675.
19. Brouwer WP, Baars EN, Germans T, et al. In-vivo T1 cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:28.
20. Florian A, Ludwig A, Rösch S, Yildiz H, Sechtem U, Yilmaz A. Myocardial fibrosis imaging based on T1-mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measurement in muscular dystrophy patients: diagnostic value compared with conventional late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15(9):1004-1012.
21. Chin CW, Semple S, Malley T, et al. Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15(5):556-565.
22. Sibley CT, Noureldin RA, Gai N, et al. T1 mapping in cardiomyopathy at cardiac MR: comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Radiology 2012;265(3):724-732.
23. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218(1):215-223.
24. Weingartner S, Akcakaya M, Roujol S, et al. Free-breathing combined three-dimensional phase sensitive late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping for myocardial tissue characterization. Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.25495. Published online October 16, 2014. Accessed January 10, 2015.