Class proportion estimation with application to multiclass anomaly rejection

Journal of Machine Learning Research

Volumn 33, Issue , 2014, Pages 850-858

  Sanderson, Tyler ^a   Scott, Clayton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BENCHMARKING; STATISTICAL TESTS;

BENCHMARK DATA; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; LABELED TRAINING DATA; LEARNING STRATEGY; PROPORTION ESTIMATIONS; TESTING DATA; TRAINING AND TESTING; TRAINING DATA;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84955479515     PISSN: 15324435     EISSN: 15337928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. P. Hall. On the non-parametric estimation of mixture proportions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 43(2):147-156, 1981.
2. D. M. Titterington. Minimum distance non-parametric estimation of mixture proportions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 45(1):37-46, 1983.
3. P. Hall and X.-H. Zhou. Nonparametric estimation of component distributions in a multivariate mixture. Annals of Statistics, 31(1):201-224, 2003.
4. P. Latinne, M. Saerens, and C. Decaestecker. Adjusting the outputs of a classier to new a priori probabilities may signicantly improve classication accuracy: Evidence from a multi-class problem in remote sensing. In C. Sammut and A. H. Hoffmann, editors, Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 298-305, 2001.
5. M. C. Du Plessis and M. Sugiyama. Semi-supervised learning of class balance under class-prior change by distribution matching. In J. Langford and J. Pineau, editors, Proc. 29th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 823-830, 2012.
6. C. K. Chow. On optimum error and reject trade-off. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 16:41-46, 1970.
7. M. Palatucci, D. Pomerleau, G. E Hinton, and T. Mitchell. Zero-shot learning with semantic output codes. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1410-1418, 2009.
8. N. Görnitz, M. Kloft, K. Rieck, and U. Brefeld. Toward supervised anomaly detection. J. Artif. Intell. Res.(JAIR), 46:235-262, 2013.
9. G. Blanchard, G. Lee, and C. Scott. Semi-supervised novelty detection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:2973-3009, 2010.
10. C. Scott, G. Blanchard, and G. Handy. Classification with asymmetric label noise: Consistency and maximal denoising. In Proc. 2013 Conference on Learning Theory, JMLR W&CP 30, pages 489-511, 2013.
11. L. Devroye, L. Györfi, and G. Lugosi. A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition. Springer, 1996.
12. C. Lloyd. Regression models for convex ROC curves. Biometrics, 56(3):862-867, September 2000.
13. D. Roggen, A. Calatroni, M. Rossi, T. Holleczek, G. Trster, P. Lukowicz, G. Pirkl, D. Bannach, A. Ferscha, J. Doppler, C. Holzmann, M. Kurz, G. Holl, R. Chavarriaga, H. Sagha, H. Bayati, and J. Milln . Collecting complex activity data sets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Networked Sensing Systems, 2010.
14. M. Duarte and Y. H. Hu. Vehicle classification in distributed sensor networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 64(7):826-838, 2004.