Effect of harvest date on Arundo donax L. (giant reed) composition, ensilage performance, and enzymatic digestibility

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 205, Issue , 2016, Pages 97-103

  Liu, Shan ^a,b   Ge, Xumeng ^a   Liu, Zhe ^a   Li, Yebo ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Energy crops; Ensilage; Enzymatic digestibility; Giant reed; Harvest time

Indexed keywords

CROPS; HARVESTING; LACTIC ACID;

ENERGY CROPS; ENSILAGE; ENZYMATIC DIGESTIBILITY; GIANT REED; HARVEST TIME;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; CARBOXYLIC ACID; CELLULOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LACTIC ACID; LIGNIN; NITROGEN; PROTEIN;

BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DIGESTIBILITY; ENERGY CROP; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GRASS; HARVESTING; LIGNIN; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHYTOMASS; SILAGE; STORAGE; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; ARUNDO DONAX; BIOMASS; ENZYME DEGRADATION; GRASS; HARVEST PERIOD; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; POACEAE; SILAGE; TIME FACTOR;

ARUNDO DONAX;

BIOMASS; CARBOHYDRATES; LIGNIN; NITROGEN; POACEAE; SILAGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84955280353     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adney, B., Nrel, J.B., 2008. Measurement of Cellulase Activities, Renewable Energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42628.
2. Angelini L.G., Ceccarini L., Nassi o Di Nasso N., Bonari E. Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33:635-643.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
4. Cui Z., Shi J., Wan C., Li Y. Comparison of alkaline- and fungi-assisted wet-storage of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 109:98-104.
5. Darr M.J., Shah A. Biomass storage: an update on industrial solutions for baled biomass feedstocks. Biofuels 2012, 3:321-332.
6. Di Girolamo G., Grigatti M., Barbanti L., Angelidaki I. Effects of hydrothermal pre-treatments on giant reed (Arundo donax) methane yield. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 147:152-159.
7. Dreihuis F., Oude Elferink S.J.W.H., Spoelstra S.F. Anaerobic lactic acid degradation during ensilage of whole crop maize inoculated with. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 87:583-594.
8. Driehuis F., Oude Elferink S.J.W.H. The impact of the quality of silage on animal health and food safety: a review. Vet. Q. 2000, 22:212-216.
9. Egg R.P., Coble C.G., Engler C.R., Lewis D.H. Feedstock storage, handling and processing. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 5:71-94.
10. Ge X., Xu F., Vasco-Correa J., Li Y. Giant reed: a competitive energy crop in comparison with miscanthus. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54:350-362.
11. Hattingh W.H.J., Thiel P.G., Siebert M.L. Determination of protein content of anaerobic digesting sludge. Water Res. 1967, 1:185-189.
12. Herrmann C., Heiermann M., Idler C. Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:5153-5161.
13. Holzer M., Mayrhuber E., Danner H., Braun R. The role of Lactobacillus buchneri in forage preservation. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:282-287.
14. Kreuger E., Nges I., Björnsson L. Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:44.
15. Lewandowski I., Scurlock J.M.O., Lindvall E., Christou M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 25:335-361.
16. Liu S., Ge X., Liew L.N., Liu Z., Li Y. Effect of urea addition on giant reed ensilage and subsequent methane production by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 192:682-688.
17. Liu S., Ge X., Xu F., Li Y. Effect of total solids content on giant reed ensilage and subsequent anaerobic digestion. Process Biochem. 2016, 51:73-79.
18. Liu S., Xu F., Liu Z., Li Y. Food waste addition for enhanced giant reed ensiling and methane production. Trans. ASABE 2015, (in press).
19. Luca C., Pilu R., Tambone F., Scaglia B., Adani F. New energy crop giant cane (Arundo donax L.) can substitute traditional energy crops increasing biogas yield and reducing costs. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 191:197-204.
20. Meng X., Ragauskas A.J. Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27:150-158.
21. Monti A., Di Virgilio N., Venturi G. Mineral composition and ash content of six major energy crops. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:216-223.
22. Nassi o Di Nasso N., Roncucci N., Triana F., Tozzini C., Bonari E. Seasonal nutrient dynamics and biomass quality of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deuter) as energy crops. Ital. J. Agron. 2011, 6:152-158.
23. Oude Elferink S.J., Krooneman J., Gottschal J.C., Spoelstra S.F., Faber F., Driehuis F. Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1, 2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67:125-132.
24. Pakarinen A., Maijala P., Jaakkola S., Stoddard F.L., Kymäläinen M., Viikari L. Evaluation of preservation methods for improving biogas production and enzymatic conversion yields of annual crops. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:20.
25. Pakarinen O., Lehtomäki A., Rissanen S., Rintala J. Storing energy crops for methane production: effects of solids content and biological additive. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7074-7082.
26. Piltz J.W., Kaiser A.G. Principles of silage preservation. Successful Silage 2004, Dairy Australia and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. A.G. Kaiser, J.W. Piltz, H.M. Burns, N.W. Griffiths (Eds.).
27. Ren H., Richard T.L., Chen Z., Kuo M., Bian Y., Moore K.J., Patrick P. Ensiling corn stover: effect of feedstock preservation on particleboard performance. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22:78-85.
28. Selig, M.J., Weiss, N., Ji, Y., 2008. Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42629. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42629.
29. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Nrel, D.C., 2011. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618.
30. Smith R., Slater F.M. Mobilization of minerals and moisture loss during senescence of the energy crops Miscanthus x giganteus, Arundo donax and Phalaris arundinacea in Wales, UK. GCB Bioenergy 2011, 3:148-157.
31. Vasco-Correa J., Li Y. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of fungal pretreated Miscanthus sinensis harvested in two different seasons. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 185:211-217.
32. Weiland P. Biogasproduction: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85(849):860.
33. Yahaya M., Kimura A., Harai J., Nguyen H., Kawai M., Takahashi J., Matsuoka S. Effect of length of ensiling on silo degradation and digestibility of structural carbohydrates of lucerne and orchardgrass. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 92:141-148.
34. Yang H.Y., Wang X.F., Liu J.Bin, Gao L.J., Ishii M., Igarashi Y., Cui Z.J. Effects of water-soluble carbohydrate content on silage fermentation of wheat straw. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101:232-237.
35. Zheng Y., Yu C., Cheng Y.S., Zhang R., Jenkins B., VanderGheynst J.S. Effects of ensilage on storage and enzymatic degradability of sugar beet pulp. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1489-1495.