Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis

Evidence-Based Mental Health

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 16-21

  Caldwell, Deborah M ^a   Welton, Nicky J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; META ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MENTAL DISORDERS; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84955243324     PISSN: 13620347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/eb-2015-102275     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Centre for Evidence BAsed MedicineLevels of Evidence. 2015 (cited 15 October 2015). http://www. cebm. net.
2. Nikolakopoulou A, Mavridis D, Salanti G. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis. Evid Based Ment Health2014; 17: 53-7.
3. Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5. 1. 0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www. cochrane-handbook. org.
4. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc2009; 172: 137-59.
5. Wong G. Is complexity just too complex? J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: 1199-201.
6. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ2008; 337: a1655.
7. Petticrew M, Anderson L, Elder R, et al. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 1209-14.
8. Kühne F, Ehmcke R, Härter M, et al. Conceptual decomposition of complex health care interventions for evidence synthesis: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21: 817-23.
9. Jakobsen JC, Hansen JL, Storebø OJ, et al. The effects of cognitive therapy versus'no intervention' for major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE2011; 6: e28299.
10. Rees K, Bennett P, West R, et al. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (2): CD002902.
11. Tugwell P, Knottnerus JA, Idzerda L, Complex interventions-how should systematic reviews of their impact differ from reviews of simple or complicated interventions? J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: 1195-6.
12. Squires JE, Valentine JC, Grimshaw JM. Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: 1215-22.
13. Anderson LM, Petticrew M, Chandler J, et al. Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions. J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: 1205-8.
14. Churchill R, Moore TH, Furukawa TA, et al., 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 10: CD008705.
15. Hunot V, Moore TH, Caldwell DM, et al., 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 10: CD008704.
16. Shinohara K, Honyashiki M, Imai H, et al. Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 10: CD008696.
17. Caldwell D, Hunot V, Moore TH, et al. Behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010; (9): CD008697.
18. Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Noyes J, et al. Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute. J Clin Epidemiol2013; 66: 1230-43.
19. Melendez-Torres GJ, Bonell C, Thomas J. Emergent approaches to the meta-analysis of multiple heterogeneous complex interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol2015; 15: 47.
20. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti FD, Versino E, et al. School-based prevention for illicit drugs use: a systematic review. Prev Med2008; 46: 385-96.
21. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol2010; 29: 1-8.
22. Churchill R, Moore TH, Caldwell D, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010; (9): CD008698.
23. Mavridis D, Giannatsi M, Cipriani A, et al. A primer on network meta-analysis with emphasis on mental health. Evid Based Ment Health2015; 18: 40-6.
24. Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making2013; 33: 607-17.
25. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making2013; 33: 641-56.
26. Caldwell DM. An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis. Syst Rev2014; 3: 109.
27. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven Psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001454.
28. Linde K, Sigterman K, Kriston L, et al. Effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med2015; 13: 56-68.
29. Pompoli A, Furukawa TA, Imai H, et al. Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst RevIn press.
30. Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Adamopoulos E, et al. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of complex interventions: psychological interventions in coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol2009; 169: 1158-65.
31. Button KS, Munafò MR. Addressing risk of bias in trials of cognitive behavioral therapy. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry2015; 27: 144-8.
32. Furukawa TA, Noma H, Caldwell DM, et al. Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand2014; 130: 181-92.
33. Zhu Z, Zhang L, Jiang J, et al. Comparison of psychological placebo and waiting list control conditions in the assessment of cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 2014; 26: 319-31.
34. Cuijpers P, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, et al. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias. Br J Psychiatry2010; 196: 173-8.
35. Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health2011; 11: 119.
36. Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, et al. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 152.
37. Guise J-M, Chang C, Viswanathan M, et al. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 1181-91.
38. Möhler R, Köpke S, Meyer G. Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation ofComplex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2). Trials 2015; 16: 204.
39. Gardner F, Mayo-Wilson E, Montgomery P, et al. Editorial Perspective: The need for new guidelines to improve the reporting of trials in child and adolescent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry2013; 54: 810-12.
40. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ2015; 350: h1258.
41. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013; 46: 81-95.
42. Anderson LM, Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, et al. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods2011; 2: 33-42.
43. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5. 3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
44. Avaialble from http://www. openbugs. net/.