Complex interventions-how should systematic reviews of their impact differ from reviews of simple or complicated interventions?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1195-1196

  Tugwell, Peter ^a   Knottnerus, J André ^a   Idzerda, Leanne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDITORIAL; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MORTALITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROPENSITY SCORE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; SOCIAL STIGMA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TUBERCULOSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84885013143     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. J.J. Deeks Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests BMJ 323 2001 157 162
2. Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Available at http://srdta. cochrane.org/sites/srdta.cochrane.org/files/uploads/ Chapter%2010%20%20Version%201.0.pdf.