Machine learning bandgaps of double perovskites

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Pilania, G ^a   Mannodi Kanakkithodi, A ^b   Uberuaga, B P ^a   Ramprasad, R ^b   Gubernatis, J E ^c   Lookman, T ^c  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE LEARNING; MODEL; PREDICTION; SPECIES;

EID: 84955239430     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep19375     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191-201 (2013).
2. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S. & Ramprasad, R. Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci. rep. 3, 2810 (2013).
3. Sharma, V. et al. Rational design of all organic polymer dielectrics. Nat. comm. 5, 4845 (2014).
4. Ceder, G., Hauthier, G., Jain, A. & Ong, S. P. Recharging lithium battery research with first-principles methods. Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 36, 185-191 (2011).
5. Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOWLIB.ORG: AFLOWLIB. ORG: A distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 227 (2012).
6. Materials Project-A Materials Genome Approach, http://materialsproject.org/(accessed: 15th October 2015).
7. Computational Materials Repository https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/cmr/(Documentation) and https://cmr.fysik.dtu.dk/(accessed: 15th October 2015).
8. Service, R. F. Materials scientists look to a data-intensive future. Science 335, 1434-1435 (2012).
9. Flach, P. Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).
10. Burbidge, R., Trotter, M., Buxton, B. & Holden, S. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Computers & chemistry 26, 5-14 (2001).
11. Jones, N. Quiz-playing computer system could revolutionize research. Nature News (2011), Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.95. (Accessed: 23rd November 2015).
12. MacLeod, N., Benfield, M. & Culverhouse, P. Time to automate identification. Nature 467, 154-155 (2010).
13. Abu-Mostafa, Y. S. Machines that Think for Themselves. Sci Am 307, 78-81 (2012).
14. Silver, N. The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail but Some Don't (Penguin Press, New York, 2012).
15. Mueller, T., Kusne, A. G. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning in materials science: Recent progress and emerging applications. Rev. Comput. Chem. (Accepted for publication).
16. Rajan, K. in Informatics for Materials Science and Engineering: Data-driven Discovery for Accelerated Experimentation and Application (ed. Rajan, K.), Ch. 1, 1-16 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2013).
17. Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Muller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).
18. Huan, T. D., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Ramprasad, R. Accelerated materials property predictions and design using motif-based fingerprints, Phys. Rev. B 92, 014106 (2015).
19. Schütt, K. T. et al. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 89, 205118 (2014).
20. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89 094104 (2014).
21. Faber, F., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Crystal Structure Representations for Machine Learning Models of Formation Energies. Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 115, 1094-1101(2015).
22. Faber, F., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Machine Learning Energies of 2 M Elpasolite (ABC2D6) Crystals. http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05315 (2015).
23. Pozun, Z. et al. Optimizing transition states via kernel-based machine learning. Chem. Phys. 136, 174101 (2012).
24. Behler, J. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106 (2011).
25. Botu, V. & Ramprasad, R. Adaptive machine learning framework to accelerate ab initio molecular dynamics, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1074-1083 (2015).
26. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Structure classification and melting temperature prediction in octet AB solids via machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 91, 214302 (2015).
27. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Classification of octet AB-type binary compounds using dynamical charges: A materials informatics perspective. accepted for publication in Sci. Rep. (2015).
28. Pilania, G., Balachandran, P. V., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Predicting the formability of ABO3 perovskite solids: A machine learning study. Acta Cryst. B 71, 507-513 (2015).
29. Snyder, J. C., Rupp, M., Hansen, K., Müller, K. R. & Burke, K. Finding density functionals with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 253002 (2012).
30. Lee, J., Seko, A., Shitara, K. & Tanaka, I. Prediction model of band-gap for AX binary compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00973 (2015).
31. P., Dey et al. Informatics-aided bandgap engineering for solar materials. Com. Mat. Sci. 83, 185-195 (2014).
32. Mitchell, R. H. Perovskites: Modern and Ancient (Almaz Press, Ontario, Canada, 2002).
33. Setyawan, W., Gaume, R. M., Lam, S., Feigelson, R. S. & Curtarolo, S. High-throughput combinatorial database of electronic band structures for inorganic scintillator materials. ACS Comb. Sci. 13, 382-390 (2011).
34. Olivares-Amaya, R. et al. Accelerated computational discovery of high-performance materials for organic photovoltaics by means of cheminformatics. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4849 (2011).
35. Chemical Bonding at Surfaces and Interfaces (Eds Nilsson, A., Pettersson, L. G. M. & Norskov, J. K.) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008).
36. Hedin, L. New method for calculating the one-particle Green's function with application to the electron-gas problem. Phys. Rev. 139 A796 (1965).
37. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 219906 (2006).
38. Castelli, I. E. et al. Computational screening of perovskite metal oxides for optimal solar light capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5814 (2012).
39. Castelli, I. E., Thygesen, K. S. & Jacobsen, K. W. Bandgap engineering of double perovskites for one-and two-photon water splitting. MRS Proceedings 1523,121523-0706 (2013), doi: 10.1557/opl.2013.450.
40. Vasala, S. & Karppinen, M. A2B'B"O6 perovskites: A review. Prog. Solid State Chem. 43, 1-36 (2015).
41. Martin, R. Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004).
42. Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K. W. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 35109 (2005).
43. Gritsenko, O., van Leeuwen, R., van Lenthe, E. & Baerends, E. J. Self-consistent approximation to the Kohn-Sham exchange potential. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1944 (1995).
44. Kuisma, M., Ojanen, J., Enkovaara, J. & Rantala, T. T. Kohn-Sham potential with discontinuity for band gap materials. Phys. Rev. B 82, 115106 (2010).
45. Talman, J. D. & Shadwick, W. F. Optimized effective atomic central potential. Phys. Rev. A 14, 36 (1976).
46. Castelli, I. E. et al. New light-harvesting materials using accurate and efficient bandgap calculations. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400915 (2015).
47. Andriotis, A. N. et al. Informatics guided discovery of surface structure-chemistry relationships in catalytic nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 094705 (2014).
48. Dam, H. C., Pham, T. L., Ho, T. B., Nguyen, A. T. & Nguyen, V. C. Data mining for materials design: A computational study of single molecule magnet. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 044101 (2014).
49. Brown, R. D. & Martin, Y. C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 1 (1997).
50. Zunger, A. Systematization of the stable crystal structure of all AB-type binary compounds. Phys. Rev. B 22, 5839 (1980).
51. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: Critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).
52. Nelson, L. J., Hart, G. L., Zhou, F. & Ozoliš, V. Compressive sensing as a paradigm for building physics models. Phys. Rev. B 87, 035125 (2013).
53. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York, 2009).
54. Müller, K.-R., Mika, S., Ratsch, G., Tsuda, K. & Scholkopf, B. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12, 181-201 (2001).
55. Bereau, T., Andrienko, D. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Transferable atomic multipole machine learning models for small organic molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3225-3233 (2015).
56. Hansen, K. et al. Assessment and validation of machine learning methods for predicting molecular atomization energies. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3404 (2013).
57. Lopez-Bezanilla, A. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Modeling electronic quantum transport with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235411 (2014).
58. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
59. Lide, D. R. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boston, 2004).