The neural correlates of motion-induced shifts in reaching

Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1577-1589

  Rodríguez Herreros, Borja ^a,b,c   Rodríguez Fornells, Antoni ^a,b,d   López Moliner, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b BELLVITGE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE IDIBELL   (Spain)

^c LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Extrastriate cortex; Feedforward circuits; Position coding; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; VISUAL SYSTEM; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955210220     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12519     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
2. Azzopardi, P., & Hock, H. S. (2011). Illusory motion perception in blindsight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 876-881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005974108
3. Barbur, J. L., Watson, J. D., Frackowiak, R. S., & Zeki, S. (1993). Conscious visual perception without V1. Brain, 116(Pt 6), 1293-1302. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.6.1293
4. Bartsch, M. V., Boehler, C. N., Stoppel, C. M., Merkel, C., Heinze, H. J., Schoenfeld, M. A., & Hopf, J. M. (2014). Determinants of global color-based selection in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu078
5. Berman, R. A., & Wurtz, R. H. (2011). Signals conveyed in the pulvinar pathway from superior colliculus to cortical area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 373-384. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4738-10.2011
6. Berry, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A., & Meister, M. (1999). Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature, 398, 334-338. doi: 10.1038/18678
7. Bock, O. (1986). Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Experimental Brain Research, 64, 476-482. doi: 10.1007/BF00340484
8. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. (1997). Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 297-310. doi: 10.1080/00222899709600017
9. Buchner, H., Gobbele, R., Wagner, M., Fuchs, M., Waberski, T. D., & Beckmann, R. (1997). Fast visual evoked potential input into human area V5. NeuroReport, 8, 2419-2422. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199707280-00002
10. Burr, D. C. (1981). Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 211, 321-339. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0010
11. Cai, R. H., Pouget, A., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (1997). Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature, 386, 601-604. doi: 10.1038/386601a0
12. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020306
13. Cunillera, T., Gomila, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2008). Beneficial effects of word final stress in segmenting a new language: Evidence from ERPs. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-23
14. Cunillera, T., Toro, J. M., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2006). The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1123, 168-178. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.046
15. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research, 31, 1619-1626. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90138-U
16. de'Sperati, C., & Baud-Bovy, G. (2008). Blind saccades: An asynchrony between seeing and looking. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4317-4321. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0352-08.2008
17. Durant, S., & Johnston, A. (2004). Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position. Vision Research, 44, 357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.022
18. ffytche, D. H., Guy, C. N., & Zeki, S. (1995). The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain, 118(Pt 6), 1375-1394. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.6.1375
19. Fu, Y. X., Shen, Y., Gao, H., & Dan, Y. (2004). Asymmetry in visual cortical circuits underlying motion-induced perceptual mislocalization. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2165-2171. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5145-03.2004
20. Fukiage, T., Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (2011). A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing. Journal of Vision, 11. doi: 10.1167/11.13.12
21. Gomi, H., Abekawa, N., & Nishida, S. (2006). Spatiotemporal tuning of rapid interactions between visual-motion analysis and reaching movement. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5301-5308. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-06.2006
22. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 424-438. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753978.002
23. Hesse, W., Moller, E., Arnold, M., & Schack, B. (2003). The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 124, 27-44. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00366-7
24. Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Schoner, G., & Dinse, H. R. (2004). Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 556, 971-982. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058941
25. Jennings, J. R., & Wood, C. C. (1976). Letter: The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology, 13, 277-278. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00116.x
26. Klein, C., Andresen, B., Berg, P., Kruger, H., & Rockstroh, B. (1998). Topography of CNV and PINV in schizotypal personality. Psychophysiology, 35, 272-282. doi: 10.1017/S0048577298961212
27. Kuba, M., Toyonaga, N., & Kubova, Z. (1992). Motion-reversal visual evoked responses. Physiological Research, 41, 369-373.
28. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
29. Lyon, D. C., Nassi, J. J., & Callaway, E. M. (2010). A disynaptic relay from superior colliculus to dorsal stream visual cortex in macaque monkey. Neuron, 65, 270-279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.003
30. Maunsell, J. H. (1987). Physiological evidence for two visual subsystems. Matters of Intelligence (pp. 59-87). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
31. Maunsell, J. H., Nealey, T. A., & DePriest, D. D. (1990). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3323-3334.
32. Maus, G. W., Fischer, J., & Whitney, D. (2013). Motion-dependent representation of space in area MT+. Neuron, 78, 554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.010
33. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2
34. McGraw, P. V., Walsh, V., & Barrett, B. T. (2004). Motion-sensitive neurones in V5/MT modulate perceived spatial position. Current Biology, 14, 1090-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.028
35. Mitzdorf, U. (1985). Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: Investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiological Reviews, 65, 37-100.
36. Mohrmann-Lendla, H., & Fleischer, A. G. (1991). The effect of a moving background on aimed hand movements. Ergonomics, 34, 353-364. doi: 10.1080/00140139108967319
37. Murakami, I. (2001). The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure. Journal of Vision, 1, 126-136. doi: 10:1167/1.2.6
38. Neggers, S. F., & Bekkering, H. (2002). Coordinated control of eye and hand movements in dynamic reaching. Human Movement Science, 21, 349-376. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00120-3
39. Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 387-393. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01963-0
40. Nishida, S., & Johnston, A. (1999). Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature, 397, 610-612. doi: 10.1038/17600
41. Nowak, L. G., & Bullier, J. (1997). The timing of information transfer in the visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 205-242. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9625-4_5
42. Nunez, P. L. (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. O'Brien, B. J., Abel, P. L., & Olavarria, J. F. (2001). The retinal input to calbindin-D28k-defined subdivisions in macaque inferior pulvinar. Neuroscience Letters, 312, 145-148. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02220-0
44. Perenin, M., & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Residual vision in cortically blind hemiphields. Neuropsychologia, 13, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(75)90041-X
45. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6
46. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature, 396, 424. doi: 10.1038/24766.
47. Rodionov, V., Goodman, C., Fisher, L., Rosenstein, G. Z., & Sohmer, H. (2002). A new technique for the analysis of background and evoked EEG activity: Time and amplitude distributions of the EEG deflections. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1412-1422. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00199-2
48. Rodriguez-Herreros, B., & Lopez-Moliner, J. (2008). The influence of motion signals in hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 321-329. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1527-1
49. Saijo, N., Murakami, I., Nishida, S., & Gomi, H. (2005). Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4941-4951. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4143-04.2005
50. Scherg, M. (1990). Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology, 6, 40-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.01.004
51. Schmid, M. C., Mrowka, S. W., Turchi, J., Saunders, R. C., Wilke, M., Peters, A. J., ... Leopold, D. A. (2010). Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 466, 373-377. doi: 10.1038/nature09179
52. Schmolesky, M. T., Wang, Y., Hanes, D. P., Thompson, K. G., Leutgeb, S., Schall, J. D., & Leventhal, A. G. (1998). Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 3272-3278.
53. Schneider, M. R. (1972). A multistage process for computing virtual dipolar sources of EEG discharges from surface information. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 19, 1-12. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1972.324152
54. Schoenfeld, M. A., Noesselt, T., Poggel, D., Tempelmann, C., Hopf, J. M., Woldorff, M. G., ... Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Analysis of pathways mediating preserved vision after striate cortex lesions. Annals of Neurology, 52, 814-824. doi: 10.1002/ana.10394
55. Seth, A. K. (2010). A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186, 262-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.020
56. Shipp, S., & Zeki, S. (1989). The organization of connections between areas V5 and V1 in macaque monkey visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1, 309-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00798.x
57. Sincich, L. C., Park, K. F., Wohlgemuth, M. J., & Horton, J. C. (2004). Bypassing V1: A direct geniculate input to area MT. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1123-1128. doi: 10.1038/nn1318
58. Snowden, R. J. (1998). Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology, 8, 1343-1345. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00567-2
59. Standage, G. P., & Benevento, L. A. (1983). The organization of connections between the pulvinar and visual area MT in the macaque monkey. Brain Research, 262, 288-294. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91020-X
60. Steinman, R. M., Kowler, E., & Collewijn, H. (1990). New directions for oculomotor research. Vision Research, 30, 1845-1864. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90163-F
61. Stevens, M. C., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2005). Hemispheric differences in hemodynamics elicited by auditory oddball stimuli. NeuroImage, 26, 782-792. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.044
62. Sundberg, K. A., Fallah, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2006). A motion-dependent distortion of retinotopy in area V4. Neuron, 49, 447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.023
63. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-Dimensional proportional system: An approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
64. Tse, P. U., Whitney, D., Anstis, S., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization. Journal of Vision, 11, 12. doi: 10.1167/11.3.12
65. van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1050-1063. doi: 10.1152/jn.00652.2003
66. Vetter, P., Grosbras, M. H., & Muckli, L. (2013). TMS Over V5 disrupts motion prediction. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1052-1059. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht297
67. Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Ding, M. (2008). Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: A cautionary note. NeuroImage, 41, 767-776. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.025
68. Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 954-959. doi: 10.1038/78878
69. Whitney, D., Ellison, A., Rice, N. J., Arnold, D., Goodale, M., Walsh, V., & Milner, D. (2007). Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2644-2649. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl172.
70. Whitney, D., Goltz, H. C., Thomas, C. G., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Flexible retinotopy: Motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex. Science, 302, 878-881. doi: 10.1126/science.1087839
71. Whitney, D., Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature, 423, 869-873. doi: 10.1038/nature01693
72. Wojtach, W. T., Sung, K., Truong, S., & Purves, D. (2008). An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 16338-16343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808916105
73. Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2010). Detection of a weak somatosensory stimulus: Role of the prestimulus mu rhythm and its top-down modulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 307-322. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21247