Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 357-366

  Durant, Szonya ^a   Johnston, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feedback; Interaction; Motion; Psychophysics; Spatial localisation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA RECEPTIVE FIELD; ROTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRIATE CORTEX; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0345490725     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersen R.A., Snowden R.J., Treue S., Graziano M. Hierarchical processing of motion in the visual cortex of monkey. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 55:1990;741-748.
2. Arnold D.H., Durant S., Johnston A. Latency differences and the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 43:2003;1829-1835.
3. Bosking W.H., Crowley C.C., Fitzpatrick D. Spatial coding of position and orientation in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 5:2002;874-882.
4. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 40:2000;1645-1648.
5. Bullier J. Feedback connections and conscious vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5:2001;369-370.
6. Churan J., Ilg U.J. Flicker in the visual background impairs the ability to process a moving visual stimulus. European Journal of Neuroscience. 16:2002;1151-1162.
7. Culham J.C., Dukelow S.P., Vilis T., Hassard F.A., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. Journal of Neurophysiology. 81:1999;388-393.
8. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research. 31:1991;1619-1626.
9. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science. 287:2000;2028-2036.
10. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Untangling spatial from temporal illusions. Trends in Neurosciences. 25:2002;293.
11. Ffytche D.H., Guy C.N., Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain. 118:1995;1375-1594.
12. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 1971;Cambridge University Press.
13. Gibson J.J., Radner M. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 20:1937;453-467.
14. Hess R.F., Snowden R.J. Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation. Vision Research. 32:1992;47-59.
15. Johnston A., Clifford C.W.G. A unified account of three apparent motion illusions. Vision Research. 35:1995;1109-1123.
16. Johnston A., Nishida S. Brain time or event time? Current Biology. 11:2001;R427-R430.
17. Kennedy H., Bullier J. A double-labelling investigation of the afferent connectivity to cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience. 5:1985;2815-2830.
18. Khurana B., Nijhawan R. Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature. 378:1995;565-566.
19. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research. 40:2000;201-215.
20. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences. 24:2001;335-339.
21. MacKay D.M. Perceptual stability of stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature. 181:1958;507-508.
22. Mateeff S., Hohnsbein J. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Research. 28:1988;711-719.
23. McGraw P.V., Barrett B.T., Walsh V. Motion updates perceived spatial position. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;40.
24. McGraw P.V., Whitaker D., Skillen J., Chung S.T.L. Motion adaptation distorts perceived visual position. Current Biology. 12:2002;2042-2047.
25. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:1994;256-257.
26. Nijhawan R. Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;387-393.
27. Nishida S., Johnston A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature. 1999:1999;610-612.
28. Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science. 292:2001;510-512.
29. Patel S.S., Ogmen H., Bedell H.E., Sampath V. Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science. 290:2000;1051.
30. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. Moving ahead through visual latency. Nature. 396:1998;424.
31. Shipp S., Zeki S. The organization of connections between areas V5 and V1 in macaque monkey visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1:1989;308-331.
32. Snowden R.J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology. 8:1998;1343-1345.
33. van de Grind W. Physical, neural, and mental timing. Consciousness and Cognition. 11:2002;241-264. discussion 308-13.
34. Watanabe K., Nijhawan R., Shimojo S. Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion. Vision Research. 42:2002;2645-2650.
35. Wenderoth P., Johnstone S. The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research. 28:1988;301-312.
36. Whitney D. The influence of visual motion on spatial position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;211-216.
37. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;954-959.
38. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. The position of moving objects. Science. 289:2000;1107.
39. Whitney D., Murakami I. Latency difference, not motion extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;656-657.
40. Zeki S. Representation of central fields in prestriate cortex of monkey. Brain Research. 19:1969;63-75.
41. Zeki S. Functional organization of visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Physiology. 236:1974;549-573.
42. Zeki S.M. Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature. 274:1978;423-428.
43. Zeki S., Bartels A. Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition. 8:1999;225-259.
44. Zihl J., von Cramon D., Mai N. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain. 106(pt 2):1983;313-340.