Reporting patterns and predictors of common minor adverse events following osteopathic treatment: Lessons learned from a prospective, patient-administered questionnaire feasibility study in a UK teaching clinic

European Journal of Integrative Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 634-644

  Rajendran, Dévan ^a   Bright, Philip ^a   Mullinger, Brenda ^a   Froud, Rob ^b,c  

^a European School of Osteopathy   (United Kingdom)

^b Norge Helsehøyskole ^*  (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Education; Manual therapy; Osteopathy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARM; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BACK; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DIZZINESS; FATIGUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HEAD; HEADACHE; HUMAN; LIMITED MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MUSCLE RIGIDITY; NECK; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; ONLINE SYSTEM; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PAIN; PART ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; UNITED KINGDOM; VELOCITY;

EID: 84955197295     PISSN: 18763820     EISSN: 18763839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2015.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. General Osteopathic Council Code of Practice 2005, General Osteopathic Council, London.
2. Health & Care Professions Council Standards of Proficiency - Physiotherapists 2013, HCPC, London.
3. General Chiropractic Council Code of Practice and Standard of Proficiency 2010, GCC, London.
4. Senstad O., Leboeuf-Yde C., Borchgrevink C.F. Side-effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation: types frequency, discomfort and course. Scand. J. Prim Health Care 1996, 14:50-53.
5. Barrett A.J., Breen A.C. Adverse effects of spinal manipulation. J. R. Soc. Med. 2000, 93:258-259.
6. Thiel H.W., Bolton J.E. The reporting of patient safety incidents-first experiences with the chiropractic reporting and learning system (CRLS): a pilot study. Clin. Chiropr. 2006, 9:139-149.
7. Vogel S., Mars T., Barton T., Marlin N., Froud R., Eldridge S., et al. Clinical Risk Osteopathy and Management Summary Report (The CROaM Study) 2012, 29. General Osteopathic Council, London.
8. Rajendran D., Mullinger B., Fossum C., Collins P., Froud R. Monitoring self-reported adverse events: a prospective, pilot study in a UK osteopathic teaching clinic. Int. J. Osteopat. Med. 2009, 12:49-55.
9. Carnes D., Mullinger B., Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man. Ther. 2009, 15:2-6.
10. International Conference on Harmonisation 1.2 Adverse Events. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice - ICH Topic E6 (R1) 2002, 5. European Medicines Agency.
11. Leach J., Cross V., Fawkes C., Mandy A., Hankins M., Fiske A., et al. Investigating Osteopathic Patients' Expectations of Osteopathic Care: The OPEn Project - Full Research Report 2011, 291. General Osteopathic Council, London.
12. Carnes D., Mars T.S., Mullinger B., Froud R., Underwood M. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man. Ther. 2009, 15:355-363.
13. Cagnie B., Vinck E., Beernaert A., Cambier D. How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted?. Man. Ther. 2004, 9:151-156.
14. Lancaster G.A., Dodd S., Williamson P.R. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2004, 10:307-312.
15. General Osteopathic Council Student fitness to practise: Guidance about Professional Behaviours and Fitness to Practise for Osteopathic Students 2012, GOsC, London.
16. General Osteopathic Council Osteopathic Practice Standards 2012, General Osteopathic Council, London. 1st ed.
17. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112:155.
18. Hurwitz E.L., Morgenstern H., Vassilaki M., Chiang L.M. Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine 2005, 30:1477-1484.
19. Senstad O., Leboeuf-Yde C., Borchgrevink C. Frequency and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 1997, 22:435-440.
20. Thiel H.W., Bolton J.E., Docherty S., Portlock J.C. Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey. Spine 2007, 32:2375-2378. (discussion 9).
21. Gooberman-Hill R., Woolhead G., MacKichan F., Ayis S., Williams S., Dieppe P. Assessing chronic joint pain: lessons from a focus group study. Arthritis Care Res. 2007, 57:666-671.
22. Trott C.A., Ruiz Aguila M.E., Leaver A.M. The clinical significance of immediate symptom responses to manual therapy treatment for neck pain: observational secondary data analysis of a randomized trial. Man. Ther. 2014, 19:549-554.
23. Haldeman S., Kohlbeck F.J., McGregor M. Risk factors and precipitating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. Spine 1999, 24:785-794.
24. Senstad O., Leboeuf-Yde C., Borchgrevink C. Predictors of side effects to spinal manipulative therapy. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 1996, 19:441-445.
25. World Health Organisation APPENDIX II - MedDRA terminology to be used in Section 4.8 "Undesirable effects" of SPC. Essential Medicines and Health Products Information Portal 2004, WHO. version 04-2004. WH Organisation (Ed.).
26. Langworthy J.M., Cambron J. Consent: its practices and implications in United Kingdom and United States chiropractic practice. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2007, 30:419-431.
27. Langworthy J.M., le Fleming C. Consent or submission? The practice of consent within UK chiropractic. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2005, 28:15-24.
28. Puentedura E.J., March J., Anders J., Perez A., Landers M.R., Wallmann H.W., et al. Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports. J. Man. Manip. Ther. 2012, 20:66-74.
29. Bitzer E.M., Petrucci M., Lorenz C., Hussein R., Dorning H., Trojan A., et al. A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2011, 9:23.
30. Fawkes C., Leach J., Mathias S., Moore A.P. Standardised Data Collection within Osteopathic Practice in the UK: Development and First Use of a Tool to Profile Osteopathic Care in 2009 2010, 176. University of Brighton.
31. Rubinstein S.M., Leboeuf-Yde C., Knol D.L., de Koekkoek T.E., Pfeifle C.E., van Tulder M.W. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2007, 30:408-418.
32. Sturgis P., Allum N., Brunton-Smith I. Attitudes over time: the psychology of panel conditioning. Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys 2009, 113-126. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, London. P. Lynn (Ed.).
33. Underwood M.R., Parsons S., Eldridge S.M., Spencer A.E., Feder G.S. Asking older people about fear of falling did not have a negative effect. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2006, 59:629-634.
34. Vogel S. Adverse events and treatment reactions in osteopathy. Int. J. Osteopat. Med. 2010, 13:83-84.
35. Rajendran D., Bright P., Bettles S., Carnes D., Mullinger B. What puts the adverse in 'adverse events'? Patients' perceptions of post-treatment experiences in osteopathy - a qualitative study using focus groups. Man. Ther. 2012.
36. Bent S., Padula A., Avins A.L. Brief communication: better ways to question patients about adverse medical events: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144:257-261.
37. Kailas A., Chia-Chin C., Watanabe F. From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. Pulse IEEE 2010, 1:57-63.
38. Morrison L.G., Yardley L., Powell J., Michie S. What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from critical interpretive synthesis. Telemed. J. E Health 2012, 18:137-144.
39. Leboeuf-Yde C., Lemeunier N., Wedderkopp N., Kjaer P. Evidence-based classification of low back pain in the general population: one-year data collected with SMS Track. Chiropr. Man. Ther. 2013, 21:30.
40. White A., Cummings M., Hopwood V., MacPherson H. Informed consent for acupuncture - an information leaflet developed by consensus. Acupunct. Med. 2001, 19:123-129.
41. White A., Hayhoe S., Hart A., Ernst E. Adverse events following acupuncture: prospective survey of 32000 consultations with doctors and physiotherapists. Brit. Med. J. 2001, 323:485-486.
42. Lincolnshire Community Health Services Lincolnshire Community Health Services, Clinical Services 2011.
43. Leach C.M.J., Hodgson L., Defever E., Ives R. Communicating risk and shared decision-making in osteopathic practice: a pilot study using focus groups to test a patient information leaflet. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2014, 6:478-487.
44. Leach J., Mandy A., Hankins M., Ives R., Cross V., Cage M., et al. Communicating Risks of Treatment and Informed Consent in Osteopathic Practice - A Literature Review and Pilot Focus Groups 2011, National Council for Osteopathic Research, London.