Adverse events and treatment reactions in osteopathy

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 83-84

  Vogel, Steven ^a  

^a Research Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; CERVICAL SPINE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NECK PAIN; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STROKE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 77956344515     PISSN: 17460689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2010.06.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Rothwell D.M., Bondy S.J., Williams J.L. Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: a population-based case-control study. Stroke 2001, 32:1054-1060.
2. Haldeman S., Kohlbeck F.J., McGregor M. Unpredictability of cerebrovascular ischemia associated with cervical spine manipulation therapy. Spine 2002, 27:49-55.
3. Smith W.S.M., Johnston S.C., Skalabrin E.J., Weaver M., Azari P., Albers G.W., et al. Spinal manipulative therapy is an independent risk factor for vertebral artery dissection. Neurology 2003, 60:1424-1428.
4. Ernst E. Cerebrovascular complications associated with spinal manipulation. Phys Ther Rev 2004, 9:5-15.
5. Rosner A.L. Chiropractic manipulation and stroke. A population-based case-control study. Stroke 2001, 32:2207-2208.
6. Breen A. Manipulation of the neck and stroke: time for more rigorous evidence. Med J Aust 2002, 176:364-365.
7. Taylor A., Kerry R. A 'system based' approach to risk assessment of the cervical spine prior to manual therapy. Int J Osteopath Med 2010, 13:85-93.
8. Rubinstein S.M., Leboeuf-Yde C., Knol D.L., de Koekkoek T.E., Pfeifle C.E., van Tulder M.W. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007, 30:408-418.
9. Rivett D., Shirley D., Magarey M., Refshauge R. Clinical guidelines for assessing vertebrobasilar insufficiency in the management of cervical spine disorders 2006, Australian Physiotherapy Association (APA), Retrieved 02.06.10 from:. http://tinyurl.com/2a69m7x.
10. Barker S., Kesson M., Ashmore J., Turner G., Conway J., Stevens D. Guidance for pre-manipulative testing of the cervical spine. Man Ther 2000, 5:37-40.
11. Anderson-Peacock E., Blouin J.S., Bryans R., Danis N., Furlan A., Marcoux H., et al. Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2005, 49:158-209. The Canadian Chiropractic Association and the Canadian Federation of Chiropractic Regulatory Boards, Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Initiative, Guidelines Development Committee (GDC) comprising, Retrieved 02.06.10 from:. http://tinyurl.com/2ejeeur.
12. Kerry R., Taylor A., Mitchell J., Brew J., Kiely R., Robertson G., et al. Cervical artery dysfunction and manipulative therapy information document. Manipulation association of chartered physiotherapists Retrieved 02.06.10 from. http://www.macpweb.org/home/index.php%3Fm%3Dfile%26f%3D395.
13. General Chiropractic Council C-100107 Minutes of the meeting of the GCC 2007, General Chiropractic Council, p. 1-16.
14. Oppenheim J.S., Spitzer D.E., Segal D.H. Non-vascular complications following spinal manipulation. Spine 2006, 5:660-666. [discussion 666-7].
15. Snelling N.J. Spinal manipulation in patients with disc herniation: a critical review of risk and benefit. Int J Osteopath Med 2006, 9:77-84.
16. Barrett A.J., Breen A.C. Adverse effects of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med 2000, 93:258-259.
17. MacPherson H., Thomas K., Walters S., Fitters M. A prospective survey of adverse events and treatment reactions following 34,000 consultations with professional acupuncturists. Acupunct Med 2001, 19:93-102.
18. Carnes D., Mullinger B., Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Manual Therapy 2010, 15(1):2-6.
19. McIlwraith B. A survey of 1200 osteopathic patients in the United Kingdom. J Osteopath Med 2003, 6:7-12.
20. Berthon J., Team 3 Research into archival data. Br Osteopath J 1993, XII:32-39.
21. Hinkley H., Drysdale I. Audit of 1000 patients attending the clinic of the British College of Naturopathy and Osteopathy. Br Osteopath J 1995, XVI:17-27.
22. Pringle M., Tyreman S. Study of 500 patients attending an osteopathic practice. Br J Gen Pract 1993, 43:15-18.
23. General Osteopathic Council Osteopathy snapshot survey unpublished results 1998, General Osteopathic Council.
24. General Osteopathic Council Snapshot survey 2001 unpublished results 2001, General Osteopathic Council.
25. UK BEAM Trial Team (a) United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. Br Med J 2004, 329. 10.1136/bmj.38282.669225.AE.
26. UK BEAM Trial Team (b) United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. Br Med J 2004, 329. doi:101136/bmj.38282.607859.AE.
27. Williams N., Edwards R., Linck P., Muntz R., Hibbs R., Wilkinson C., et al. Cost utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2004, 21:643-650.
28. Williams N.H., Wilkinson C., Russell I., Edwards R.T., Hibbs R., Linck P., et al. Randomized osteopathic manipulation study (ROMANS): pragmatic trial for spinal pain in primary care. Fam Pract 2003, 20:662-669.
29. Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther 2010, in press. doi:10.1016/j.math.12.006.