The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 414-432

  Contrafatto, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955183249     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Adams, C. (1999). The nature and processes of corporate reporting on ethical issues. London: CIMA.
2. Adams, C. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223-250.
3. Adams, C. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reportingperformance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731-757.
4. Adams, C., & Harte, G. (1998). The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks and retail companies' annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(8), 781-812.
5. Adams, C., & Larrinaga-Gonzáles, C. (2007). Engaging with organizations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 333-355.
6. Adams, C., & Mc Nicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382-402.
7. Adams, C., & Whelan, G. (2009). Conceptualising future change in corporate sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(1), 118-143.
8. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819-841.
9. Bebbington, J. (2001). Sustainable development: A review of the international development, business and accounting literature. Accounting Forum, 25(2), 128-157.
10. Bebbington, J., Higgings, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588-625.
11. Bebbington, J., O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). Postscript and conclusions. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O'Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.
12. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Putman.
13. Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbrigde. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(2), 163-190.
14. Buhr, N. (2002). A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(1), 17-38.
15. Burns, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2000). Conceptualizing management accounting change: An institutional framework. Management Accounting Research, 11, 3-25.
16. Campbell, D. J. (2000). Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosures in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 80-100.
17. Carruthers, B. G. (1995). Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 313-328.
18. Contrafatto, M. (2009). Il social environmental reporting e le sue motivazioni: Teoria, analisi empirica e prospettive. Milan: Giuffrè.
19. Contrafatto, M. (2011). Social and environmental accounting and engagement research: Reflections on the state of the art and new research avenues. Economia Aziendale Online, 3, 273-289.
20. Contrafatto, M., & Rusconi, G. (2005). Social accounting in Italy: Origins and developments. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 25(2), 3-8.
21. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.
22. Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.
23. Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O'Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.
24. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.
25. Dey, C. (2007). Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (20), 423-445.
26. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991a). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991b). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. Powell, & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (This paper was originally published in 1983, in the American Sociological Review 48 (April), 147-160).
28. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
29. Dyer, W., & Wilkins, A. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619.
30. EC (European Commission) (2001). Communication of 18th July 2001. Green paper, promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. COM (2001) No. 366, Brussels.
31. EC (European Communities) (2003). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18th June 2003 amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and 91/674/EEC on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions and insurance undertakings, 2003/51/EC, Brussels.
32. European Council (1993). Council Regulation No. 1836/93 (EMAS) of 29 June 1993.
33. European Council (2001). Council Regulation No. 761/2001 (EMAS II) of 19 March 2001.
34. GBS (2009). Associazione nazionale per la ricerca scientifica sul Bilancio Sociale (Accessed September 2009). .
35. Georgakopoulos, G., & Thomson, I. (2008). Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(8), 1116-1143.
36. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37. Gray, R. (2002). The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organization and Society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687-708.
38. Gray, R. (2004). Why is social accounting so difficult?-Part I. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 24(1), 12-17.
39. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995a). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.
40. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995b). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78-101.
41. Gray, R. (2005). Il social and environmental accounting and reporting: Da speranza a sfida? Un'opinione personale sul tema? In G. Rusconi & M. Dorigatti (Eds.), Modelli di rendicontazione etico-sociale e applicazioni pratiche (pp. 113-131). Milan: Franco Angeli (English trans. Social and environmental accounting and reporting: From Ridicule to Revolution? From Hope to Hubris?-A Personal Review of the Field).
42. Gray, R., Walters, D., Bebbington, J., & Thompson, I. (1995). The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organizational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6(3), 211-239.
43. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054.
44. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.
45. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative), 2009. (Accessed September 2009).
46. Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2006). A moral epistemology of knowing subjects: Theorizing a relational turn for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 621-647.
47. Hibbitt, C., & Collison, D. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure and reporting developments in Europe. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 24(1), 1-11.
48. Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251-261.
49. Hopwood, A. G. (2005). Editorial: After 30 years. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(7-8), 585-586.
50. Hopwood, A. G. (2009a). The economic crisis and accounting: Implications for the research community. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 797-802.
51. Hopwood, A. G. (2009b). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 433-439.
52. Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility (ISEA) (2009). (Accessed September 2009).
53. International organization for standardization (ISO) (1999). Environmental Management ISO 14000/14031.
54. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
55. Jones, S. (1985). The analysis of depth interviews. In R. Walker (Ed.), Applied qualitative research. Gower: Aldershot.
56. KPMG (2005). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Univeriteit van Amsterdam.
57. Larrinaga-González, C., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 12(3), 269-292.
58. Larrinaga-González, C., Carrasco-Fenech, F., Caro-Gonzalez, F. J., Correa-Ruiz, C., & Páez-Sandubete, M. (2001). The role of environmental accounting in organizational change: An exploration of Spanish companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213-239.
59. Larrinaga-González, C. (2007). Sustainability reporting: Insights from the neo-institutional theory. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O'Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.
60. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-networktheory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 349-361.
62. Lowndes, V. (1996). Varieties of new institutionalism: A critical appraisal. Public Administration, 74(Summer), 181-197.
63. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
64. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (This paper was originally published in 1977, in the American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363).
65. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
66. Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice: An introduction. In A. G. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Miller, P., & Napier, C. (1993). Genealogies of calculation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7/8), 631-674.
68. Milne, M., & Gray, R. (2007). Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O'Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.
69. Moll, J., Burns, J., & Major, M. (2006). Institutional theory. In Z. Hoque (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories and methods. London: Spiramus.
70. O'Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406-436.
71. O'Dwyer, B. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: Illuminating a process for transforming a 'messy' but 'attractive' 'nuisance'. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scenes view of using qualitative research methods. Oxford: Elsevier.
72. O'Dwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279-296.
73. O'Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31-52.
74. O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7/8), 801-824.
75. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
76. Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563-588.
77. Patten, D. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
78. Quattrone, P. (2006). The possibility of the testimony: A case for case study research. Organization, 13(1), 143-157.
79. Scott, R. W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
80. Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publishing.
81. Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
82. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
83. Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507-533.
84. Veblen, T. (1919). The place of science in modern civilization and other essays. New York: Heubsch.
85. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
86. Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (This paper, with the exception of the postscript, was first published in 1977 in the American Sociological Review 45 (2), 726-743).