Erratum: Interlayer water regulates the bio-nano interface of a β-sheet protein stacking on graphene(Scientific Reports (2015) 5 (7572) DOI: 10.1038/srep07572);Interlayer Water Regulates the Bio-nano Interface of a β-sheet Protein stacking on Graphene

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Lv, Wenping ^a   Xu, Guiju ^a   Zhang, Hongyan ^a   Li, Xin ^a   Liu, Shengju ^a   Niu, Huan ^a   Xu, Dongsheng ^b   Wu, Ren'An ^a  

^a DALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF METAL RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFREEZE PROTEIN; GRAPHITE; PROTEIN; WATER;

ADSORPTION; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; TEMPERATURE;

ADSORPTION; ANTIFREEZE PROTEINS; GRAPHITE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

EID: 84954519520     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09546     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. Sarikaya, M., Tamerler, C., Jen, A. K. Y., Schulten, K., Baneyx, F. Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nat Mater 2, 577-585, doi:10.1038/Nmat964 (2003).
2. Zhao, Y. L., Xing, G.M., Chai, Z. F. Nanotoxicology: Are carbon nanotubes safe Nat Nanotechnol 3, 191-192, doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.77 (2008).
3. Nel, A. E. et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 8, 543-557, doi:10.1038/Nmat2442 (2009).
4. Kostarelos, K., Novoselov, K. S. Exploring the Interface of Graphene and Biology. Science 344, 261-263, doi:10.1126/science.1246736 (2014).
5. Zhang, J. Q. et al. Molecular recognition using corona phase complexes made of synthetic polymers adsorbed on carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol 8, 959-968, doi:10.1038/Nnano.2013.236 (2013).
6. Georgakilas, V. et al. Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications. Chem Rev 112, 6156-6214, doi:10.1021/Cr3000412 (2012).
7. Hu,W. B. et al. Protein Corona-Mediated Mitigation of Cytotoxicity of Graphene Oxide. Acs Nano 5, 3693-3700, doi:10.1021/Nn200021j (2011).
8. Lu, C.H., Yang, H. H., Zhu, C. L., Chen, X.& Chen, G. N. A graphene platform for sensing biomolecules. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48, 4785-4787, doi:10.1002/anie.200901479 (2009).
9. Graslund, S. et al. Protein production and purification. Nat Methods 5, 135-146, doi:10.1038/Nmeth.F.202 (2008).
10. Xue, T. et al. Integration of molecular and enzymatic catalysts on graphene for biomimetic generation of antithrombotic species. Nat Commun 5, doi:10.1038/ncomms4200 (2014).
11. Norde, W. Adsorption of Proteins from Solution at the Solid-Liquid Interface. Adv Colloid Interfac 25, 267-340, doi:10.1016/0001-8686(86)80012-4 (1986).
12. Penna, M. J., Mijajlovic, M., Biggs, M. J. Molecular-Level Understanding of Protein Adsorption at the Interface between Water and a Strongly Interacting Uncharged Solid Surface. J AmChem Soc 136, 5323-5331, doi:10.1021/ja411796e (2014).
13. Mermut, O. et al. In Situ Adsorption Studies of a 14-Amino Acid Leucine-Lysine Peptide onto Hydrophobic Polystyrene and Hydrophilic Silica Surfaces Using Quartz Crystal Microbalance, Atomic Force Microscopy, and Sum Frequency Generation Vibrational Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 128, 3598-3607, doi:10.1021/ja056031h (2006).
14. Katoch, J. et al. Structure of a Peptide Adsorbed on Graphene and Graphite. Nano Lett 12, 2342-2346, doi:10.1021/Nl300286k (2012).
15. Calzolari, A. et al. Hydroxyl-Rich beta-Sheet Adhesion to the Gold Surface in Water by First-Principle Simulations. J Am Chem Soc 132, 4790-4795, doi:10.1021/Ja909823n (2010).
16. Schneider, J., Ciacchi, L. C. Specific material recognition by small peptides mediated by the interfacial solvent structure. J Am Chem Soc 134, 2407-2413, doi:10.1021/ja210744g (2012).
17. Tang, Z. H. et al. Biomolecular Recognition Principles for Bionanocombinatorics: An Integrated Approach To Elucidate Enthalpic and Entropic Factors. Acs Nano 7, 9632-9646, doi:10.1021/Nn404427y (2013).
18. Kimmel, G. A. et al. No Confinement Needed: Observation of a Metastable Hydrophobic Wetting Two-Layer Ice on Graphene. J Am Chem Soc 131, 12838-12844, doi:10.1021/Ja904708f (2009).
19. Xu, K., Cao, P. G., Heath, J. R. Graphene Visualizes the First Water Adlayers on Mica at Ambient Conditions. Science 329, 1188-1191, doi:10.1126/science.1192907 (2010).
20. Patel, A. J. et al. Extended surfaces modulate hydrophobic interactions of neighboring solutes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 17678-17683, doi:10.1073/pnas.1110703108 (2011).
21. Patel, A. J., Varilly, P., Chandler, D. Fluctuations of water near extended hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. J Phys Chem B 114, 1632-1637, doi:10.1021/jp909048f (2010).
22. Zhu, C. Q., Li, H., Huang, Y. F., Zeng, X. C., Meng, S. Microscopic Insight into Surface Wetting: Relations between Interfacial Water Structure and the Underlying Lattice Constant. Phys Rev Lett 110, doi:126101 10.1103/Physrevlett.110.126101 (2013).
23. Zhang, Y. et al. Assembly of Graphene Oxide-Enzyme Conjugates through Hydrophobic Interaction. Small 8, 154-159, doi:10.1002/smll.201101695 (2012).
24. Kim, S. N. et al. Preferential Binding of Peptides to Graphene Edges and Planes. J Am Chem Soc 133, 14480-14483, doi:10.1021/Ja2042832 (2011).
25. Baweja, L., Balamurugan, K., Subramanian, V., Dhawan, A. Hydration Patterns of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials (GBNMs) Play aMajor Role in the Stability of a Helical Protein: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. Langmuir 29, 14230-14238, doi:10.1021/La4033805 (2013).
26. Guo, J., Yao, X., Ning, L., Wang, Q., Liu, H. The adsorption mechanism and induced conformational changes of three typical proteins with different secondary structural features on graphene. RSC Adv 4, 9953-9962, doi:10.1039/C3RA45876H (2014).
27. Zuo, G., Zhou, X., Huang, Q., Fang, H. P., Zhou, R. H. Adsorption of Villin Headpiece onto Graphene, Carbon Nanotube, and C60: Effect of Contacting Surface Curvatures on Binding Affinity. J Phys Chem C 115, 23323-23328, doi: 10.1021/Jp208967t (2011).
28. Balamurugan, K., Singam, E. R. A., Subramanian, V. Effect of Curvature on the a-Helix Breaking Tendency of Carbon Based Nanomaterials. J Phys Chem C 115, 8886-8892, doi:10.1021/jp110898r (2011).
29. Lv, W.,Wu, R. The interfacial-organized monolayer water film (MWF) induced "two-step" aggregation of nanographene: both in stacking and sliding assembly pathways. Nanoscale 5, 2765-2775, doi:10.1039/c3nr33447c (2013).
30. Hakim, A. et al. Crystal Structure of an Insect Antifreeze Protein and Its Implications for Ice Binding. J Biol Chem 288, 12295-12304, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.450973 (2013).
31. Mao, X. B. et al. Sequence Effects on Peptide Assembly Characteristics Observed by Using Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 135, 2181-2187, doi: 10.1021/Ja307198u (2013).
32. Ingrosso, F., Monard, G. R., Hamdi Farag, M., Bastida, A., Ruiz-López, M. F. Importance of Polarization and Charge Transfer Effects to Model the Infrared Spectra of Peptides in Solution. J Chem Theory Comput 7, 1840-1849, doi:10.1021/ct2000588 (2011).
33. Morita, S., Fujii, A.,Mikami, N., Tsuzuki, S. Origin of the attraction in aliphatic C-H/pi interactions: Infrared spectroscopic and theoretical characterization of gas-phase clusters of aromatics with methane. J Phys Chem A 110, 10583-10590, doi: 10.1021/Jp064297k (2006).
34. Johnson, E. R. et al. Revealing noncovalent interactions. J Am Chem Soc 132, 6498-6506, doi:10.1021/ja100936w (2010).
35. Lu, T., Chen, F. W. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33, 580-592, doi:10.1002/Jcc.22885 (2012).
36. Wu, P., Chaudret, R., Hu, X., Yang, W. Noncovalent Interaction Analysis in Fluctuating Environments. J Chem Theory Comput 9, 2226-2234, doi:10.1021/ct4001087 (2013).
37. Tsuzuki, S., Fujii, A. Nature and physical origin of CH/pi interaction: significant difference from conventional hydrogen bonds. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10, 2584-2594, doi:10.1039/B718656h (2008).
38. Willett, R. L., Baldwin, K. W.,West, K. W.& Pfeiffer, L. N. Differential adhesion of amino acids to inorganic surfaces. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 7817-7822, doi:10.1073/pnas.0408565102 (2005).
39. Shlesinger, M. F., Zaslavsky,G.M. & Klafter, J. Strange kinetics. Nature 363, 31-37 (1993).
40. Shih, C. J., Lin, S. C., Strano, M. S., Blankschtein, D. Understanding the Stabilization of Liquid-Phase-Exfoliated Graphene in Polar Solvents: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Kinetic Theory of Colloid Aggregation. J Am Chem Soc 132, 14638-14648, doi:10.1021/Ja1064284 (2010).
41. Luzar, A., Chandler, D. Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid water. Nature 379, 55-57, doi:10.1038/379055a0 (1996).
42. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Hess, B., van der Vegt, N. F. A., Delle Site, L. Competing adsorption between hydrated peptides and water onto metal surfaces: From electronic to conformational properties. J Am Chem Soc 130, 13460-13464, doi: 10.1021/Ja804350v (2008).
43. Lv, W. P. The adsorption of DNA bases on neutral and charged (8,8) carbonnanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 514, 311-316, doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.08.062 (2011).
44. Lv, W. P., Chen, M. D., Wu, R. A. The impact of the number of layers of a graphene nanopore on DNA translocation. Soft Matter 9, 960-966, doi:10.1039/C2sm26476e (2013).
45. Lv, W. P., Liu, S. J., Li, X., Wu, R. A. Spatial blockage of ionic current for electrophoretic translocation of DNA through a graphene nanopore. Electrophoresis 35, 1144-1151, doi:10.1002/elps.201300501 (2014).
46. Kabsch, W., Sander, C. Dictionary of Protein Secondary Structure-Pattern-Recognition of Hydrogen-Bonded and Geometrical Features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-2637, doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 (1983).
47. Pascal, T. A., Lin, S. T., Goddard, W. A., 3rd. Thermodynamics of liquids: standard molar entropies and heat capacities of common solvents from 2PT molecular dynamics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13, 169-181, doi:10.1039/c0cp01549k (2011).
48. Hub, J. S., de Groot, B. L., van der Spoel, D. g-wham-A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates. J Chem Theory Comput 6, 3713-3720, doi:10.1021/Ct100494z (2010).
49. Cornell, W. D. et al. A 2nd Generation Force-Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic-Acids, and Organic-Molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117, 5179-5197 (1995).
50. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. J Chem Phys 79, 926-935, doi:10.1063/1.445869 (1983).
51. Essmann, U. et al. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. J Chem Phys 103, 8577-8593 (1995).
52. Bussi, G., Donadio, D., Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126, doi:014101 10.1063/1.2408420 (2007).
53. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C., Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18, 1463-1472, doi:10.1002/(Sici)1096-987x(199709)18:121463::Aid-Jcc4.3.0.Co;2-H (1997).
54. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E.GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4, 435-447, doi:10.1021/ct700301q (2008).
55. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model 14, 33-38, doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 (1996).