Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 204, Issue , 2016, Pages 202-212

  Jegatheesan, Veeriah ^a   Pramanik, Biplob Kumar ^a   Chen, Jingyu ^b   Navaratna, Dimuth ^c   Chang, Chia Yuan ^d   Shu, Li ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fouling; Membrane bioreactor; Sludge retention time; Textile wastewater

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; FOULING; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; RECLAMATION; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TEXTILES;

DEGRADATION OF POLLUTANTS; INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY; SLUDGE RETENTION TIME; SUSTAINABLE OPERATIONS; TEXTILE WASTEWATER; TEXTILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MICROORGANISM; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEGRADATION; FOULING CONTROL; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SLUDGE TREATMENT; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; ANALYSIS; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; METABOLISM; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE; TEXTILE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTORS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; SEWAGE; TEXTILES; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84954306406     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Achilli E.A., Marchand A.E., Childress A. Performance evaluation of three membrane bioreactor systems: aerobic, anaerobic, and attached-growth. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:2999-3005.
2. Akram A., Stuckey D.C. Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process Biochem. 2008, 43:93-102.
3. Ali H. Biodegradation of synthetic dyes-a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 213(1-4):251-273.
4. An Y.Y., Yang F.L., Bucciali B., Wong F.S. Municipal wastewater treatment using a UASB coupled with cross-flow membrane filtration. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135:86-91.
5. Badani Z., Ait-Amar H., Si-Salah A., Brik M., Fuchs W. Treatment of textile wastewater by membrane bioreactor and reuse. Desalination 2005, 185:411-417.
6. Baek S.H., Pagilla K.R., Kim H.J. Lab-scale study of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for dilute municipal wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2010, 15:704-708.
7. Bechtold T., Burtscher E., Hung Y.T. Treatment of textile wastes. Waste Treatment in the Process Industries 2006, 363-392. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. L.K. Wang, Y.T. Hung, H.H. Lo, C. Yapijakis (Eds.).
8. Brik M., Schoeberl P., Chamam B., Braun R., Fuchs W. Advanced treatment of textile wastewater towards reuse using a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1751-1757.
9. Bui Xuan T., Nguyen Phuoc D., Nguyen Thanh B. Fouling mitigation in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating dyeing and textile wastewater. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 47(1-3):150-156.
10. Chang I.S., Gander M., Jefferson B., Judd S.J. Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Trans. IChemE 2001, 79(B):183-188.
11. Chang I.S., Le Clech P., Jefferson B., Judd S. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 128:1018-1029.
12. Chen C.H., Fu Y., Gao D.W. Membrane biofouling process correlated to the microbial community succession in an A/O MBR. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 197:185-192.
13. Choo K.H., Stensel H.D. Sequencing batch membrane reactor treatment: nitrogen removal and membrane fouling evaluation. Water Environ. Res. 2000, 72(4):490-498.
14. Chu H.P., Li X.Y. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90(3):323-331.
15. De Jager D., Sheldon M.S., Edwards W. Membrane bioreactor application within the treatment of high-strength textile effluent. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65(5):907-914.
16. Deowan S.A., Galiano F., Hoinkis J., Figoli A., Drioli E. Submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) for treatment of textile dye wastewater towards developing novel MBR process. APCBEE Procedia 2013, 5:259-264.
17. Dias J.C.T., Rezende R.P., Silva C.M., Linardi V.R. Biological treatment of kraft pulp mill foul condensates at high temperatures using a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1125-1129.
18. Dogan B., Kerestecioglu M., Yetis U. Assessment of the best available wastewater management techniques for a textile mill: cost and benefit analysis. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61(4):963-970.
19. Drews A., Vocks M., Iversen V., Lesjean B., Kraume M. Influence of unsteady membrane bioreactor operation on EPS formation and filtration resistance. Desalination 2006, 192:1-9.
20. Feng F., Xu Z., Li X., You W., Zhen Y. Advanced treatment of dyeing wastewater towards reuse by the combined Fenton oxidation and membrane bioreactor process. J. Environ. Sci. China 2010, 22(11):1657-1665.
21. Friha I., Bradai M., Johnson D., Hilal N., Loukil S., Amor F.B., Feki F., Han J., Isoda H., Sayadi S. Treatment of textile wastewater by submerged membrane bioreactor: in vitro bioassays for the assessment of stress response elicited by raw and reclaimed wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 160:184-192.
22. Gao W.J.J., Lin H.J., Leung K.T., Liao B.Q. Influence of elevated pH shocks on the performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2010, 45:1279-1287.
23. Grilli S., Piscitelli D., Mattioli D., Casu S., Spagni A. Textile wastewater treatment in a bench-scale anaerobic-biofilm anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor combined with nanofiltration. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2011, 46(13):1512-1518.
24. Hai F.I., Yamamoto K., Fukushi K. Development of a submerged membrane fungi reactor for textile wastewater treatment. Desalination 2006, 192(1-3):315-322.
25. Hai F.I., Yamamoto K., Nakajima F., Fukushi K. Removal of structurally different dyes in submerged membrane fungi reactor-biosorption/PAC-adsorption, membrane retention and biodegradation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325(1):395-403.
26. Hoinkis J., Deowan S.A., Panten V., Figoli A., Huang R.R., Drioli E. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology -a promising approach for industrial water reuse. Procedia Eng. 2012, 33:234-241.
27. Hu A.Y., Stuckey D.C. Treatment of dilute wastewaters using a novel submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Eng. 2006, 132:190-198.
28. Hu A.Y., Stuckey D.C. Activated carbon addition to a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor: effect on performance, transmembrane pressure, and flux. J. Environ. Eng. 2007, 133:73-80.
29. Huang X., Gui P., Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36:1001-1006.
30. Huang Z., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. Feasibility of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) for treatment of low-strength wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58(2008):1925-1931.
31. Huang R.R., Hoinkis J., Hu Q., Koch F. Treatment of dyeing wastewater by hollow fiber membrane biological reactor. Desalination Water Treat. 2009, 11(1-3):288-293.
32. Huang Z., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011, 45:705-713.
33. Innocenti L., Bolzonella D., Pavan P., Cecchi F. Effect of sludge age on the performance of a membrane bioreactor: influence on nutrient and metals removal. Desalination 2002, 146(1-3):467-474.
34. Ivanovic I., Leiknes T.O. The biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) - a review. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 37:288-295.
35. Jarusutthirak C., Amy G. Role of soluble microbial products (SMPs) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40(3):969-974.
36. Kant R. Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat. Sci. 2012, 4(01):22-26.
37. Khor S.L., Sun D.D., Hay C.T., Leckie J.O. Comparison of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor in Different SRT Conditions. Water Pract. Technol. 2006, 1(3). IWA Publishing. 10.2166/WPT.2006056.
38. Konsowa A.H., Eloffy M.G., El-Taweel Y.A. Treatment of dyeing wastewater using submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination Water Treat. 2013, 51(4-6):1079-1090.
39. Laspidou C.S., Rittmann B.E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002, 36(11):2711-2720.
40. Le-Clech P., Jefferson B., Juddm S. Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 218:117-129.
41. Lesjean B., Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Jekel M., Gnirss R., Amy G. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51:1-8.
42. Lin H., Chen J., Wang F., Ding L., Hong H. Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011, 280:120-126.
43. Lin H., Gao W., Meng F., Liao B.Q., Leung K.T., Zhao L., Chen J., Hong H. Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 42(7):677-740.
44. Lin H., Peng W., Zhang M., Chen J., Hong H., Zhang Y. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Desalination 2013, 314:169-188.
45. Liu Y., Fang H.H.P. Influences of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on flocculation, settling, and dewatering of activated sludge. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 33:237-273.
46. Martinez-Sosa D., Helmreich B., Netter T., Paris S., Bischof F., Horn H. Anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment under mesophilic and psychrophilic temperature conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:10377-10385.
47. Martin-Garcia I., Monsalvo V., Pidou M., Le-Clech P., Judd S.J., McAdam E.J., Jefferson B. Impact of membrane configuration on fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 382:41-49.
48. Parameshwaran, K., Visvanathan, C. 1998. Recent developments in membrane technology for wastewater reuse. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse. Milan, Italy, 14-16 September.
49. Park H., Choo K.H., Lee C.H. Flux enhancement with powdered activated carbon addition in the membrane anaerobic bioreactor. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34:2781-2792.
50. Qin L., Zhang G., Meng Q., Xu L., Lv B. Enhanced MBR by internal micro-electrolysis for degradation of anthraquinone dye wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 210:575-584.
51. Qu Y.Y., Zhou J.T., Wang J., Xing L.L., Jiang N., Gou M., Uddin M.S. Population dynamics in bioaugmented membrane bioreactor for treatment of bromoamine acid wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(1):244-248.
52. Rondon H., El-Cheikh W., Boluarte I.A.R., Chang C.Y., Bagshaw S., Farago L., Jegatheesan V., Shu L. Application of enhanced membrane bioreactor (eMBR) to treat dye wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 183:78-85.
53. Rosenberger S., Kraume M. Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002, 146:373-379.
54. Rosenberger S., Evenblij H., Te Poele S., Wintgens T., Laabs C. The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge processes-six case studies of different European research groups. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263:113-126.
55. Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Lesjean B., Gnirss R., Amy G., Jekel M., Schrotter J.C. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40:710-720.
56. Saddoud A., Ellouze M., Dhouib A., Sayadi S. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater in Tunisia. Desalination 2007, 207:205-215.
57. Schoeberl P., Brik M., Bertoni M., Braun R., Fuchs W. Optimization of operational parameters for a submerged membrane bioreactor treating dyehouse wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 44:61-68.
58. Song K.G., Kim Y., Ahn K.H. Effect of coagulant addition on membrane fouling and nutrient removal in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2008, 221:467-474.
59. Spagni A., Grilli S., Casu S., Mattioli D. Treatment of a simulated textile wastewater containing the azo-dye reactive orange 16 in an anaerobic-biofilm anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 2010, 64:676-681.
60. 2O-MBR in a pilot-scale. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286:416-424.
61. Wang X., Li J., Li X., Du G. Influence of aeration intensity on the performance of A/O-type sequencing batch MBR system treating azo dye wastewater. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2011, 5(4):615-622.
62. Wen C., Huang X., Qian Y. Domestic wastewater treatment using an anaerobic bioreactor coupled with membrane filtration. Process Biochem. 1999, 35:335-340.
63. Wu B., An Y., Li Y., Wong F.S. Effect of adsorption/coagulation on membrane fouling in microfiltration process post-treating anaerobic digestion effluent. Desalination 2009, 242:183-192.
64. Xing C.H., Tardieu E., Qian Y., Wen X.H. Ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for urban wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 177:73-82.
65. Yan Z.S., Wang S.H., Kang X.K., Ma Y. Enhanced removal of organics and phosphorus in a hybrid coagulation/membrane bioreactor (HCMBR) for real textile dyeing wastewater treatment. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 47(1-3):249-257.
66. Yigit N.O., Uzal N., Koseoglu H., Harman I., Yukseler H., Yetis U., Civelekoglu G., Kitis M. Treatment of a denim producing textile industry wastewater using pilot-scale membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2009, 240:143-150.
67. You S.J., Teng J.Y. Anaerobic decolorization bacteria for the treatment of azo dye in a sequential anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactor. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2009, 40:500-504.
68. You S.J., Teng J.Y. Performance and dye-degrading bacteria isolation of a hybrid membrane process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172(1):172-179.
69. You S.J., Tseng D.H., Ou S.H., Chang W.K. Performance and microbial diversity of a membrane bioreactor treating real textile dyeing wastewater. Environ. Technol. 2007, 28(8):935-941.
70. You S.J., Damodar R.A., Hou S.C. Degradation of Reactive Black 5 dye using anaerobic/aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) and photochemical membrane reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177(1-3):1112-1118.
71. Yun M.A., Yeon K.M., Park J.S., Lee C.H., Chun J., Lim D.J. Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40:45-52.
72. Yurtsever A., Sahinkaya E., Aktas O., Ucar D., Cinar O., Wang Z. Performances of anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of synthetic textile wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 192:564-573.
73. Zheng X., Liu J.X. Dyeing and printing wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor with a gravity drain. Desalination 2006, 190(1-3):277-286.
74. Zheng X., Fan Y.B., Wei Y.S. A pilot scale anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor (A/O MBR) for woolen mill dyeing wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Sci. China 2003, 15(4):449-455.
75. Zhou H., Li H., Wang F. Anaerobic digestion of different organic wastes for biogas production and its operational control performed by the modified ADM1. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2012, 47:84-92.